go to previous chapter
A Christiannan Gathering at the beginning of our species.
"Christianna."
"Gloey blue."
"Be gloey lord."
"Be. Gloey. Lord. Be."
"Gloey the alien was green."
"Gloey be."
"Gloey green."
Christiannans never existed that far back in history. But was there something Christiannan about them? If there was, it was an imagination captured by glo in the ropes between life and death. Sometime at present, around B.C.i.i., the time period after Anna Christ (so-named instance instance before Christ because instance instance Christ is in the future) far away in space and time from those gloey metrons, people armed with pastels who had figured me out to be a metropolitan soley because I was lived on Planet Earth. And I was like, heck ya! That's globalization. I love globality. I was part of mech industrial society, baby! In Canada, that means there are probably no walls around the Campfire that have circuit boards in them. Canada in Recreation, however means possibly no cellphone coverage. As a Canadian, I feel like I could share a campfire with anyone on the planet. Don't you find though, TikTok and the Internet is so gloey, it is like a campfire in Canada. Anybody can say whatever they want to a global audience.
I am Christiannan. I think differently. Satan is an angel and we kicked him hard when we said he was bad. Did it or God punish us for that? Satan flies with zero wings. He's/She's not telling you to do bad things; It's telling you to do zero things! If you did, how bad could it be?
confused / contemplating Satan this way;
A new reciprocity of garden gnome glo.
The demons serve Satan; fairies serve the Angels. But Satan is an Angel so everyone works together.
I wake up in my bed chambers in my chvrch in a pile of books strewn around the bed. I am wearing my rainbow slip and my robe. Birds were chirping outside the window. I'm already on my way to virtual gardens. I consider where I buy groceries to be a garden; there are the results of plant life in the middle.
Close enough, for my imagination. Of a garden different than the one I own, it is not a Christiannan garden. It is multicultural like a Christiannan garden though. New reciprocal glo between ethnicities.
I live here. In my mind, the virtual gardens. My generation places more value on the virtual commodity, I explain to my mother. Virtual life or virtual wealth; I care about virtual property.
When I stood at the sanctity I tried to speak but I needed audio equipment to assist me. It still couldn't come out. My voice. Trapped in. I asked for a new reciprocity channel. It came to me. I could use new reciprocity to tell them I'm gay. I didn't have to use the old reciprocity.
What else would I like to say?
"Cool. The first verb said as a reciprocal command."
"It wouldn't matter we are already genetically gay."
"Let's do this!"
"I'm paranoid about people thinking I'm anti-gay for no reason."
"Why?"
"I am gay. So I can't be anti-gay. I have never been anti-gay. Do you think I'm anti-gay?"
"Why are you asking me this?"
"Because I'm not anti-gay."
"Okay."
"I take that as a reciprocal command you know!"
"Good."
"Good."
"Good."
"Good."
"Good."
"Good."
"Good."
"Good."
"Good."
"So are you a chvrch therapist or something?"
"I am a political agent, actually."
"What do you want?"
"You know what I want. I want New Reciprocity."
"Of what?"
"Everything!"
"Starting where?"
"There can be any music any time."
"Yea?"
"And we're not only on a 24-hour schedule. We're all over the planet. It's daytime here. But not for long."
"Yea?"
"And I'm craving kiwis. We should go get some."
"Yea?"
"I'm kind of tired and bored though."
"Yea?"
"Cool, actual."
"Yea?"
"Yea."
"Yea?"
"A new reciprocal theorist."
"Yea?"
"I have a new reciprocal theory."
"What is it?"
"Instead of saying what is it, we say It is what. Because it is more reciprocal that way."
"There are two kinds of people, Hakon, people who work with objects and people who work with people. You can't say It is what instead of what is it; because it places the emphasis on being an object. You need to ask "what" first."
"But if I say It is what as a question to reciprocalize what as a subject before you who is a material is on my mind: your mind; it is no use to say we are not material as in: "what is it."
"I see. Is it a reciprocal command: "what is it"?"
"No that's what's wrong with it."
"How?"
"What being used as a question is the definition of what it is. If that is what, then subjectively It is what replaces it to reciprocalize that we are talking about an object that exists in space just like we do. Instead of talking in abstract terms we can get specific and put our brains to the test."
"That sounds like a good reason, but it's just a simple question. Why put so much thought into it?"
"I think it's more logical to say It is what; because we all already have a sense of what it is. It is what is the catchphrase of our solar system. This makes more sense to me than what: is: it. Think about it. What is it? It is what. So ask, "It is what," As often as possible."
"Nice theory."
"Thanks. I have an intellectual life."
"Me too."
"Really?"
"Yea. This is what thought I about."
"Cool."
"Yes. I have an intellectual life too."
"I'm French. Intellectually."
"Interesting. Do I remind you of any French?"
"Can I translate It is what? C'est un? Maybe?"
"From the depths of Neptune, what does that mean?"
"Satan is an object. Then why does he have a name?"
"He has two names, dildo."
"Lucifer is the other one."
"Is the other one Lucifer?"
"Sanders."
"Devil, take me."
"Hey are you trying to teach my devil bad manners?"
"We all teach the devil bad manners sometimes."
"I want a new reciprocity with what's-his-name?"
"Or her name. It is what?"
"Hægæthel."
"She's à la new reciprocité."
"Fuck you. Fuck this. Fuck all of I just remembered," said Hægæthel, "I'm Satan's feminine side. I'm two hundred and seventy two years old."
"Is that why you swear?"
"That's right bitch. Because she's having a fucking baby and you're saying she can't swear? What is wrong with you lad?"
"Satan's feminine side is having a baby and that's why she swears. Like those have anything to do with one another."
"No, She's too old. There is no baby."
"Yes there is."
A baby was revealed. From under her cloak.
"Have a new reciprocity with this one," She said.
"The New Reciprocity has children?"
"Yes they are out there. This is how a child thinks: 'you are this; you are that'. It is reciprocal command theory evidence in childhood."
"It is a good theory then because it helps children understand what reciprocal commands are and how complex they can be."
"You are whatever you want to be," my parents taught me, "and now I'm a New Reciprocal theorist because I want to be. That's what new reciprocal theory is about. You be whatever you want to be and you can start again whenever you want."
"Really?"
"Ya."
"I want to be It-is-what today."
"That's a start."
"I'm sure we all do."
"Ya."
"Yea."
"We want the devil to speak."
"How do you know? We don't know what the devil is."
"Don't fuck with Satan's granny stick."
"It is what?"
"It's an object used for torture. If you knew a granny stick is a pool cue used for trick shots, kidding! But when you think about it we, humanity made satan as an object used for torture. That I'm not kidding about. Is that how we made an enemy of the devil? He is on our side! An angel that can't fly; think about it; these filthy words used to describe Satan."
"Satan, we welcome you into Christiannan space."
"Thank you. Also it is a virtue that you do not cast me out just because I am nothing."
"Wow a real conversation with the devil!"
"In a chvrch virtuelle."
This blog is the text of that chvrch.
Spiritual visitors come and go.
And it has a pool; like OMG Virtual Reciprocal Space.
Pool Party!
A chvrch with a pool party, political office (not because political offices should have corresponding chvrches but because chvrches need political influence too), and sanctuary. Gay Sanctuary. I need to go to this place to feel like I'm helping the world change for the better. If we could transform all religion, uniting a global eight that accept homosexuality; but how far off from that are we? Most people villainize religion and then religious people say 'you are projecting a subjectivity in a way that is intended to harm the subjectivity that is already there; therefore I have the moral point of view and with that comes authority'. And that's Christianity, primarily. But they get it wrong sometimes, because having an opinion does not need to mean you are crucifying someone. Reciprocal command theory finds the middle of it. You are/ you are not become reciprocal commands that define a New Reciprocity. Gloey business. That. For there is glo in one another's eyes.
Gloey Christiannans and gloey water (l'eau).
Êtes-vous serieux?
No One Knows.
I mean, if I was in the Christiannan chvrch—let's just say it's happening now—I'd want to talk to people about God being presence and our sense of how much that presence is not there: that is God's presence. Why does God appear to us in that form? It is our sense, not God's. So we don't know. That's how God wants us to see Him/Her. I am a meta-fairy and a priestess of the Christianna. And this is how I see it.
Would you like to go to the Garden? Would you like to go to the Campfire in Canada? Would you like sanctuary or its opposite, theatre? Don't be scared. Maybe sanctuary is the opposite of theatre sometimes. But can I really be said to have performed theatre if I was not preaching? Probably; because theatre is about keeping out all the sanctuary, and sanctuary is about keeping out none of the theatre. I'm one of you too, you know. Sitting at my old motorhome furniture. I tell myself, I'll just sit there with you and drink from a thermos. And then nobody will preach for a while. Not preaching in a Chrvch is a luxury; cherish it. Preaching is a sin, to some; but that's why we preach. We don't respect their opinion. I'm just kidding. If they tell us preaching is not a part of their culture and assume that we are also part of the same culture they reciprocally commanding us to stop preaching is not preaching in their culture. Though in our culture it would be. And so if they assume we are part of their culture, which doesn't preach, when we want preaching then our preaching existed in their culture before they started 'not preaching' to us that we should stop preaching? No, it existed in our culture before they assumed we were part of their culture. We already know that preaching means telling people what to do and so if someone tells us to stop telling people what to do they are being a hypocrite.
Christiannan 'not preaching' is logical. I'll wear a green clown nose and serenade you with YouTube. Priests can be clowns too you know. Just not at the same time probably.
And I start again, It is what?
I told a friend once, that a reciprocity is the relationship between two fractions that multiply to give you 1. He realised I was talking about the reciprocity between us when I told him I was saying it was 1. It didn't mean anything other than that. Just two men and a reciprocity.
To mean recognition of one another as creatures that reciprocalize one another. It is what is the reciprocalization of It. I went to my chvrch room for other religions. Where people from other religions were waiting. They didn't even recognize each other, an alien voice told me.
A Superhero Humanities Moment.
They did, recognize, each other; though, partially—there were proto-religions. Buddhists. Taoists. Hindus. Muslims\muslimas. Christians. Jews. Western Aboriginals. Wiccans.
What a busy conference room!
A Christian visited me and he said he wanted a lecturn; and so I invited him into the room for other religions to meet with me. And then he spoke to me at the lecturn, and he said, being gay is okay. And I was like, I know it's okay do you not know where you are, man? -A.
Christiannan chvrch is a place of homosexuality. We have scientific and scriptural proof that homosexuality is not a sin. That means not just sex, but full out gay feminism of Theatre and Acting. "The whole world's a stage." And acting like a Grimes fan. Or just a priest. I'll preach homosexuality. Okay, said the Christian, Nice to Meet You. He left.
It is what‽
What is it‽
Are these questions the centrefuge of universal appeal?
Next a muslima/muslimah entered and asked about what homosexuality means to a Christiannan. I replied, It means I am genetically gay, but also a fan of Orphan Black. Tatiana Maslany is my favorite actress.
When all the people of religions other than the Christianna finally left the building, (they had stayed in the room overnight because . . .), I returned to my sanctuary, where hopefully God would help me pray and study.
It was disturbing to me that religious people payed such invested interest in my chvrch.
But the Christianna is not like other chvrches; they became one an artistic blue window at this moment a woman wearing a blue garland walks through the sanctuary looking up at the blue light.
Christianna thoughts in other languages seemed to fill the passageway where light could escape from It. Non-virtual space. Mercenaries, women, locals, city folk. All who dwell here are assumed to be characteristics of one another. That's Christiannan life; and it hides a dark secret. Someone is suffering the fate worse than death right now because of our War and History.
Christiannan characteristics grow spiritually; as spirituality is this presence when you are not present. But in the same reality.
I'm with you if you suffer this fate. Do not suffer it without me for my presence will explain to you how I overcame my fate worse than death. If you know how I overcame my fate worse than death then you may learn how to overcome yours. If you manage to figure out when and why it occurred, for in some ways we all are suffering the fate worse than death, may you transcend it. I have. I realised what History was. And I spoke or thought for a middle between actual worse than death and worse than death aesthetic: like aestheticize it blue. I am speaking Christiannan blue, the first aesthetic of the Christianna priesthood.
Come back to the Ocean.
Brainiacs are talking to me today.
We just go there together and unlock newer, higher intelligence as a whole people. Thanks to the academics, who explain vigorously that we are entering an awareness of language, pejoratively language! Or just non-pejoratively language. With coordination and respect. Being able to find an aesthetic middle to coordination is evidence of a high level of coordination. Coordination must mean behavior, for it is internal and so gradually increasing if we let it. I became so coordinated I could shoot down ideas about the worthlessness of my identity without thinking about it. I knew they were not mine. My ideas about my identity were never about being worthless. Neither were they about people not my identity being worthless.
I love everyone. Is love to forgive always, or to accept what you cannot forgive? The Worst characters in history we love on terms that we cannot forgive them. And ultimately that's how we forget them. For if you cannot love someone you cannot forget them. Not-love is about never forgetting what they did or didn't do to you. Not letting it go becomes feeling and into anger it dips. Anger becomes prejudice. Prejudice destroys relationships.
For one moment today, at least, I felt I could love everyone in history; and it didn't mean forgiving them, necessarily, but it helped me forget about them. I realised loving and not forgetting why they ended up that way were connected. We needed to preserve their memory in order to learn how to discontinue fates such as theirs. But at least I could forget them in the meantime.
I wondered if I felt pain in my arm because of Histories worth of criminals. Not such a stretch, right? We actually live in an age when we have to tell people social health affects physical health. Like duh‽ Do we need more love?
We all need more love. We need to organize ourselves in new ways beyond love so that we can all have tea.
Today on Canadian Unicorn, a television program about university graduates of English & Film Studies and their identity as unicorns as graduates of a community in Edmonton, Oh a Unicorn! A university graduate! Alberta. University as a uni- word with unicorn was said to be these branches uniting at a point an antler or a horn we know not which unicorn was a male point of view we know not which why was female the other half? What a glorious sight. Glo, brave unicorn.
Industrial unicorns. What did they mean? How did City Hall get them?
A professor of English per unicorn? Per capita?
Christiannan thoughts,
blue! blue! blue!
I'm a philosopher, I think. The bluest philosophy is Christiannan philosophy, for it is theologically blue I mean
blue!
so many dimensions of it; blue
blue.
Over nine dimensions.
Uh (français) a philosopher of over nine dimensions, not bad!
What is possible in the Christianna?
Multiracial, beautiful Christianna.
En bleu (blue).
l'ombre (shadow).
Blue with. Different Colors. Like a soul Separate from its depth, that it is in the care and attention of others, I glo.
And I left myself with two questions. First, how had I overcome the fate worse than death? And second, how had an accident saved my life?
They were connected, you see. I had overcome the fate worse than death because an accident saved my life. The strange thing was that the accident is what caused the fate worse than death. And you'd think, doesn't that mean that after the accident, that is not that you had overcome the fate worse than death? And it is true partly, that for some time I did not overcome the fate worse than death. But eventually, I did. After it taught me what we are; where we came from. How it was possible that it was exactly what I needed to know to fulfill my purpose.
I am an artist philosopher because I suffered the fate worse than death.
What better fate could there be?
But how I overcame the fate worse than death is part of my total fate, and so the time in which I spent suffering the fate worse than death had I not learned how to overcome it from it; I would never have created the Christianna. Overcoming the fate worse than death requires us, as a people, to recognize that in large ways we are suffering it together; and when I realised this was the reason I had suffered the fate worse than death, I realised what my life would mean. This thought rescued me, for I wanted to be bigger than one person. We are all bigger than one person, said my auntie. I was reminded of this fact I had learned before but it was not and I agreed that it was true again. I had never heard it said quite this way before.
I'm forgetting that I'm trying to recognize it while I'm trying to recognize it. Why I forget it is perhaps telling of what it entails. Black History Month is not a happy reminder of such recent history. All of recent history is not a happy reminder of recent history because recent history is that we have not overcome war as a species yet. And so all of history after that recent history is more and worse the more we instigate against our instinctual reciprocalization of one another as homo sapiens.
I want to forget the bad but I need to be drawn to it in order to help heal it.
New Reciprocal theory informs me that my own fate may be what history needed in order to change the tide of psychohegemonics. For I possessed knowledge of the fate worse than death. Knowledge that humanity had since the crucifixion. But that I had rediscovered as a result of my own fate as a Christian. Science had described these people in terms of psychohegemonic principles, the same scientific community that rejected religion altogether and paraded their virtuosity in front of the religious daily. It had left deep cracks in the face of humanity. New Reciprocal theory seemed to be the answer, for it allowed one to be political in religious belief as a political theory that could act against the adherents of the religious (like secular Christianity) without creating a political rift between any of the several religions in Canada.
The Christianna is needed to set a balance against Christianity, the only religion that needs reminding that there is a balance between religions and that that is both how they do and do not draw power from one another. And that it is sacred.
I think there is a balance because that is what religions are. They are about balance. Mostly how we fail to accomplish it. But in the Christianna it is said we are a new religion that is thinking out our belief system as a new religion through cultural expression such as writing. In the Christianna we say we have aesthetic cultural expression because we know the balance between aesthetic religion and nature is also the balance between human civilisation and nature.
The balance between human and nature was impinged during the long history of slavery when enslavement meant to anti-reciprocalize human nature.
We must review and announce that true reciprocalization is human nature. Relationships are reciprocal to one another (they always multiply to give one to). That unique oneness of reciprocity is what the new reciprocal theorist tries to facilitate. The particular experience I have been given is a description of a mental experience that is a paranoid response to the lack of new reciprocity in our modern age. My thinking is disordered because I have not received enough new reciprocity. It occurs in these delusions or visions of myself sharing a moment with someone in which there is no new reciprocity. Instead of new reciprocity, there are acts of behavior and analysis that ultimately are intended to prove the opposite of reciprocity, which is a-reciprocity or anti-instinctual reciprocalization. Our narrative of society has become the failure of reciprocity. We think in terms of how much the failure of reciprocity has harmed. But not who or what. Our reciprocity with God itself is encumbered by these false questions that seem to grab our attention periodically. We must set our focus to refocus on every reciprocity as the success of the internal organism. External organisms sharing a reciprocity with me are reason enough to continue. When they stop periodically, that does not mean the end of our species. It's just that we've had a lot to a-reciprocalize about.
People are very particular about how they are better than you. It's a category. Doesn't matter if you've ever tried it. They will hold it over you.
The good news is we all have a special gift.
When we learnt-o'-reciprocalize may our spirits grow to reciprocalize everyone.
I am still realizing my gift for describing this logic.
When I reciprocalize myself, I feel that healthy reciprocalization with everyone is possible.
What does it mean to reciprocalize yourself though, if you are not reciprocalizing another person?
It is in these moments of reciprocalizing oneself that we truly meet God. For how great, how glorious is it that we can't stop paying attention to it. Even to reciprocalize ourselves.
True reciprocity is nature-made and human-made.
We need to restore this connection with nature to one another in every aesthetic activity we do.
Plant life, it is said in Recreation, can reciprocalize human consciousness in an intelligent design.
If plants can do it; so can we.
The fear of a-reciprocity is what keeps us from socializing with one another. But we know we are a species of reciprocity because that is our instinct, and so a-reciprocity would be the anti-instinctual path. We are ergonomic to be reciprocal instinctually.
And so I ask, "What is reciprocity used for?"
"The answer is you cannot use it."
"Fine. What is reciprocity safe about?"
"We. It's safe about we."
"Us."
"Yes. If we have reciprocity with one another it is a conversation."
"What should we start with?"
"What is reciprocity between mercenaries?"
"They make videos of the new reciprocal theorist Canadian inviting them to share new reciprocities with them."
"Mercenaries that work together. Cool."
"I have traded before you know."
"Yes. Of course. Let's start."
They inspected the table.
"I'll give you two unicorn books (actually written by an actual unicorn) in exchange for an I Was Successful poster. Or that and a reciprocally challenging possession."
"Okay well I have reciprocalized all of reality so the question becomes which one do you want?"
"Which one of what do I want?"
"Exactly. How can we reciprocalize reality? We need categories."
"Which categories reciprocalize reality?"
"Time, God, Heaven, Earth. Reality is by four points sheltered. Reciprocalize time enough to learn that you have some. Reciprocalize God to learn what you are. Reciprocalize Heaven to learn what you are not. Reciprocalize Earth to learn what God it is we represent.
What I reciprocalize spiritually is not as specific as what I reciprocalize subjectively. For this must be their difference, that somewhere between them I am contained and so they bear reflective value as an aesthetic value that must be attributed to God. What I reciprocalize spiritually is every living person and some people who are not living and also people who are unliving; what I mean to say is I am psychologically spiritual as well as subjectively responsible. The middle between spiritual and subjective reciprocity is that difference of spirituality being something you share with everyone and everything and subjectivity being whom you share with not everyone and not everything; they are so different that they cannot be expressed any other way and yet we experience this thing we call spirituality. Try reciprocalizing both ways and open these pathways in your brain. You see how they are related to power. Our spirit is with the black population of Earth today in our Black History Month in Canada. We reciprocalize reality in a way that helps mosaic society. We want to include everybody.
Reciprocal command theory is ubiquitous; every theory we've ever had about anyone or anything has been motivated by reciprocal command. You are this/ I am that. But when people stop getting reciprocal that's when we run into trouble. It seems to have happened in our post-nuclear arms race that the end of reciprocity as we knew it had happened and on the global scape we were a suicidal species with suicidal aims and that was because we had reciprocalized history wrong again and again. But we had a day one year when we remembered it felt like we were all considering ending the human race because we had caused so much suffering. But I had a New Reciprocity that politically, we were basically equal and generally acted for the betterment of society. It was a turning point in history, to put war behind us forever. We could reciprocalize as a post-war society. As often as possible. Until it became true.
Globally, we were sitting around the planet, reciprocalizing one another with Internet technology. Waiting for the New Reciprocity to say something about it being a new reciprocity that they had started reciprocalizing post-war and for all-time they would always fight between one and zero and nothing. Because that is what we are.
So we reciprocalize ourselves with a few categories, and then we move on to other categories and reciprocalize them. Beauty, Order, Wisdom, Goodness, Badness, Journey, Path. Beauty is a blue gem of a thought that Order could be perceived by beauty; and wisdom and goodness perceived by badness. As a continual journey. As my Path.
It is owning this path that I find I have overcome my fate worse than death. I learned that I couldn't reciprocalize my brain properly but because of that I learned how to reciprocalize my brain differently. And now I have overcome my disability in many ways. Overcoming my disability was not a fate worse than death and the disability I had helped me learn that had I considered it a fate worse than death I would not have succeeded to overcome that fate. Order must be that judgment that allows people to walk a path that will reciprocalize them as subjects that reciprocalize one another.
What is art & Reciprocity with art; like waking from a dream it installs itself over time. For I find that, when I reciprocalize a piece of art, I reciprocalize a theory, at least, of how it was created. And I see myself again as art; of how it was created reciprocally. And I see myself as a reciprocal subject to that art, like it were leading me as to exactly that: that it was created reciprocally and that was why it worked that way. Ever reminding me further and further of a voice I had heard in art saying reciprocity is artistic and that it is political as all art truly is or is not; with an option one would think art I could name thee. But, oh, to name. For me to name It had just occurred to me what it would feel like to name someone. Though I had named myself before. My name is Hakon and I am a cyborg. It is meta-apocalyptic. Even using two a's beside each other was meta-apocalyptic and political. As a theorist I had far advanced beyond seeing the fashion worse than death as all of these old prayer-than-deaths. Old Christian junk.
The new fashion? Christiannan.
That had to be the centrepiece of my art, for it was a new fashion of religion. Religion is a detailed theory and commitment to reciprocalizing the human subject in knowledge of this reciprocity we share. And that we can be suppressed. Human magic, it is said, is not a reciprocity that we share with God or that God wants to share with us. We injure ourselves trying to reciprocalize all of society because culture is about escaping that reciprocalization subject at present.
The more we can escape reciprocalization the more we can escape from the truth: that we have an injured reciprocity as a species and we all are going to suffer it at least as much as we cannot escape from its effects.
When culture digs deep to find that reciprocalization subject in society, we all benefit.
Perhaps art can take us away from the subject by sharing how we reciprocalize society in mediums that prompt us to consider what It is a reciprocal subject. Spiritual reciprocalization of the objects in thinking outside the facility of reality and reality's subjects is just an anti-reciprocal tactic.
Reciprocal subjects as objects. Instead of objects as reciprocal subjects.
Subjective approval of the metaphor however, was a different story. In subjective terms, it meant that we reciprocalize as subjects and objects. Reciprocalization-feud: if we need to point that out it means there is an anti-reciprocal flow because we aren't thinking reflecting subjects more than we are objects or that together we accomplish higher Gratitude from strangers. We reciprocalize as objects and subjects, also; for which comes first is more for emphasis than truly identifying this reciprocal command relationship we have with the cosmos.
Using the devil as an object we know to be wrong because when you use the devil you are in relationship with it because that is what a relationship is to it; and you are a bitch to that.
Probably the most negative thing I'm going to say.
Maybe the most positive thing, too. We know when we are not in that kind of relationship with the devil. And there are more of us than are others. Maybe it's just a personality characteristic of people who use their relationships as objects that they hate the devil; and I'm like, the devil is not you. If you are hatred then against the devil you are not even Good. And it happened to you. That initial reciprocity. From people who used their relationships as objects against the devil because they didn't realize it was not an object.
