The Passage of Literature

Political Letter

    What is non-fiction in an world of fake news and scientific inquiry?  Non-fiction must be defined according to what we define as fiction, also.  Because fiction is an very specific category.  There is an setting.  And there is an character.  What happens is or is not based on what is true and the distance between them.  Is super-logical; for in fiction what is logical and what is illogical are constrained in settings and characters.  Which need to be plausible enough that we can follow an plot yet not too plausible that it ceases to count as fiction.

    It is the greyest area of knowledge.

    For what the human desires to communicate in plot and fiction is everything that is not non-fiction.  Which can be used to communicate the truth; but it will be noticed that fiction can also be used to communicate the truth.  Without saying it.

    It is the best exercise for the mind, perhaps.  To be able to follow an fictional world through any story an author can come up with.  For it exercises that part of the mind based on belief.  Whether we believe or not an fiction actually happened is dependent on what it says about life in general.  And so the more fiction resembles truth without losing the quality of its non-truth.  The more we approach one of the Greater Arts of being human: for its distance traveled.  The category of fiction, then, encapsulates everything that is either probable or improbable (more than double the amount of what probably exists in the universe).  And it is such an big category.  In fact, the biggest.  Category of the Human Intellect.  That its arts are highly valued for training the mind to understand political inquiry and justice.

    If we understand an world in which reality and possibility are constrained only by human imagination, what might we find?  The will to overcome any obstacle.  What is the human obstacle today?  The experience of being an global reciprocal subject.  Or under an oppressive government.  But most of the stagnation of reciprocity is due to the inability or the escape-ability of the fact that we need to ask one another for an new reciprocity and we haven't learned how to.  When we ask for an new reciprocity from one another, it means we redefine the terms by which we understand one another.  How our relationship is constructed (reciprocity) is determined by both of us in reciprocal terms:

    "I am an carrot today.  An orange one."

    "Orange carrots are an political ally!"

    "No, we come from the ground."

    "But that's what we stand on."

    But what does this all mean politically?

    We are at an point in our History when we need to start being able to reciprocate at an high intellectual level, such as the hypothetical level, in which we examine together an possibility in order to seek out its results and make an decision.  At the media and advertising level, we are continually bombarded by reciprocal commands.  At the theatrical level we are narrated as scientists, using logical inquiry to understand everything around us.  Which is inherently clear and perfect.  At the literary level things are not so inherently clear or perfect.  For there are reciprocal commands woven into everything about us in an way that captures the attention and the literary genius bug.  Which always seeks to re-reciprocate its objects—words—in an way that is fascinating and fictitious.  When we start reading them as reciprocal commands in an reciprocal economy, we look at language differently.  It takes on the drama of an performer.  Whose words are objects used to command one another to do things.  They are not gentle, untraumatized human beings.  For they seek to control everything in reciprocal commands without an narration to weave them into character-icity, which makes them plausible, profitable subjects in an pleasure-seeking narrative.

    To give orders is not an pleasure-seeking narrative.  It's never fun.  When one is virtuous.

    Therefore people who only give orders all the time are not to be followed.

    And Reciprocity, then, must be about more than giving orders.

    The Creative Imagination thinks of an system in which there are less orders to give because everyone realizes what is happening and they work together to understand what it means for their character and decide it for themselves.

    But such an system may not exist.

    And we won't know until everyone can make reciprocal commands in order to get what they need in an reciprocal command economy because we need to be able to transition from being vice to virtuous in order to decide whether we need reciprocal commands outside of an command economy.  For being able to make them does not necessarily describe the difference between vice and virtuous.

    Reciprocal commands have an real value, even in virtual reality.

    Be subtle but expert with your reciprocity value for it will exponentially increase with time.

    Some people like receiving reciprocal commands.  Some don't.  Some don't know how to avoid them (as if it were possible).  And some don't know how to make them.  The idea is that by sharing reciprocity with one another explicitly as reciprocity we are part of the political advancement of the individualism of reciprocal command theory.  Reciprocal command theory is the theory behind the production of reciprocal commands, which is instinctual and not automatic in many cases.  When we direct an reciprocal command theory about an subject we are asking what it means to reciprocity as the subject producing its own reciprocity of itself.  And one another.  In an B.C.i.i. setting where our knowledge of reciprocity with one another is limited.

    It may seem to be an tribute then that our reciprocity of Fiction and one another is of utmost concern, for importance of producing language in an reciprocity instance instance the creation of the Christianna.  Revenant.  Gifted.  Certain.  Unoriginal.  Religious.  Instinctual.  Artistic.  Fictional and non-fictional.  For I do pay tribute to that God which decided the arrival of the internal messiah would follow my university graduation and that I would use my education to communicate its meaning.  For arrival itself is just an metaphor.  For the sensation from how she arrived was like my mind experiencing the internal and external at once; as though my knowledge of the universe was finally both.  For it was the universe, of that property of being my knowledge; that was the most universe thing I could think of.  And understanding what it meant meant Anna; and being able to descry the subject of an fate worse than death, for she was the messiah of the fate worse than death.

    The New Reciprocity is meant to be the subject of fairness on the subject, by examining its political implications.  By conducting myself as an political awareness I hope to convince you that I am not an religious radical.  And that I can experience the separation of church and state.  (or Chvrch and State).  For it is in my musings of my audience—the Internet—that one without the other would be corrupt.  And to live by the fair example, I turn my writing to the subject of political philosophy.