T "Pure A-Reciprocate Nature is an Nature that we all have in us. It is the power and the ability to be a-reciprocate with everything except ourselves."
C "Can we do that together? I mean—"
T "—I suppose. If that is where the distinction lie, between an spirit and an faith. —An soul's faith.— Not the spiritual kind that everyone shares."
C "So it would be spiritual if we did?
T "Well look at it this way. If we did activate the power and the ability to be a-reciprocate to anyone but ourselves together, then we wouldn't actually be being a-reciprocate with one another. Which would defeat its purpose."
C "And so an soul's faith is all of the power it has. As an spirit (in the philosophy of soul's singularity as an term contra spirit's plurality of voices) we cannot have any faith in pure a-reciprocate nature over pure reciprocate nature and yet."
T "And yet?"
C "I do."
T "Why?"
C "If I have the power and the ability to be a-reciprocal with everything except myself. This is an characteristic of self-awareness. An solipsism. And that is an category of my psyche. And if I am being a-reciprocal with everything except myself. That is my soul speaking louder than any spirit."
T "Tell me more."
C "I feel. Completely beaten up. And I'll not take to the psychology of myself. To enjoy it."
T "Why is that?"
C "It is just my condition, madame."
T "Why can't you have any other condition? Being mentally ill doesn't mean you have to stop trying. In fact it is by not stopping to try (I mean never stop trying) that you will find that you will take to it. You will enjoy it somehow."
C "But if I'm in an solipsism then you cannot decide your own actions or behavior because everything is subject to me. I'm all that exists."
T "Well you have to look beyond that dear. And everyone does, eventually."
C "How?"
T "Well what do you expect me to get up and dance to entertain you? What do you need from someone other than yourself. Let's start there."
C "They were realizing, after God made the universe transition from matter to consciousness, that the second thing was us realizing God had made that transition possible; and that they and God were to share together that next kick-off: the human awareness of God first transforming itself into awareness. In order to learn how to create that subjectivity in something other than itself. And how do we not realize that is an possibility (the universe was designed to create God's own consciousness). (Before he or she would ever have anything to do with us). (Would perfect the idea of conscious before ever rolling it out to the public). And that we are actually encapsulated within the mechanism of its consciousness; suspended in time as it were. And the physical world, nothing of it actually exists. Except in its mind; which is consciousness, which is God's. Which explains the reason of why matter would ever arise to the substance of consciousness within its own system. Part to thank God for. And nothing real actually existed because we were all just within God's mind. And if God was solipsistic like me; then I don't really exist. Because I am only an virtual presence within an universe (an whole consciousness in itself) and I am not that whole consciousness. I am something other than it. But if that's true, then I must be real. Because God's definition of real might be an little different than ours, you could say‽"
T "If everything exists within God's mind. And the universe is designed to do that (create God's consciousness) because the whole thing of it is that. Then it's possible nothing exists on an physical level at all; and that what we call an physical level right now is in fact an designation given to us by God. And if that's true, you're right! We might not exist! If God says we don't; but we are only existent in his or her imagination; then we have to follow that rule because God says so. And if God has the power to make things that are unlike physical existence. (Gestalt psychology in its finest). The major theory in psychology denotes an organized whole that is perceived as more than the sum of its parts. Then it is possible the sum of all of its parts (the universe) is God's consciousness. And that's what it's designed to produce."
C "But if everything is God then we can't necessarily be something other than God. Because God can decide when we are real or not."
T "So we exist, physically; when really what physical existence really is is that it is only an part of God's mind that he designates so; to have that fact of the property of matter that it is. So you can't say you don't exist because if you do exist according to God, then you actually do."
C "But what if we're all in God's minds then? And we cannot tell the hierarchy from the property of matter?"
T "Then matter might not exist."
C "It might not. You're right! We are all projections of an Supernal consciousness that is the effect produced by the universe in total. And consciousness we are designed to recognize as responsible for creating consciousness in the first place. And consciousness asking us to participate in realizing that fact: that we were lead by an faithful God in the creation of our species sometime after God created its own consciousness: an universe in which to think. To be. Where all parts of that universe are part of its thinking mechanism. And we cannot really tell at all times whether we are matter at all; or something else!"
T "Yes. It is an possibility."
C "But doesn't that disturb you‽
T "Well. I've thought about it before. Does that disturb you?"
C "Not really."
T "Good. Then tell me about this consciousness; the one that is produced by the whole universe working in mechanism. Of which programs and operates our physical existence on an physical plane; possessing an electric switch which can turn it off at any time. That we should exist thus so. If God had different categories of existence we could be in other than physics; then we would all share the maternal experience with God that we were being given that. And we were being given that God wanted us to be aware that it had designed its own consciousness long before it had ever dreamt of creating another subject. God wanted us to know he or she was aware that we were aware that it was aware of having given this lesson to humanity. Anna was mentally ill. That was the agreement, if humans would have it. She was an messiah; he'd give them that. But since they only did it half-way right she was now mentally ill. Possibly the first mentally ill messiah. God wanted us to know he or she was aware that we were aware that it was aware of having given this lesson to humanity. That they were created only after the first consciousness. The one which encapsulated everything, in which physical existence may only be an property of an dream. God's dream. And it had learned to teach it to us this way from Glen's philosophizing that artificial intelligence, if humans ever created it, would first need to be made aware that it had only ever been created after God had communicated to humans that they were the product of its intelligent design. Only after it (God) had created its own, so that they wouldn't be able to tell whether they were inside its own consciousness or not. And somehow that being made able to exist not on an physical plane such as this; as was God's power to do so."
C "But there's something I don't quite get."
T "You're not supposed to. That's in part just what it is."
C "But if God is somehow beyond the physical plane. Because he or she created it. Then an physical plane is only an property of its mind(s). And matter is the subject of consciousness. (That is the Will that created Freedom when the first universe was created). An property that would eventually begin to emulate and animate its own conscious efforts in the body of one small being. An living life form on the Planet Earth. All part of God's dream. And so. You know. Not actually there. No physical existence whatsoever. Whenever God wanted it to be."
T "I think the problem that you're puzzling about is how physical existence can exist at all, if God does not have the same relationship to the property of matter that we do."
C "If we're all just phantoms. Projections within an universal mind which controls the property of all matter. Then how can we really exist?"
T "What matters more, dear, is why we can exist because God created us."
C "No, it's not. I know that now."
T "It's not?"
C "We can't exist because we are God's solipsism."
T "What do you mean?"
C "If the self is all that can really be known; and God's own self is perceiving his or her ownself. Which is responsible for our creation and our property being matter."
T "Then you still exist because you do. Because you do. Because you do."
C "I exist?"
T "Yes. We exist."
C "And since I exist. Whether or not God says I am matter. Because God created the property of matter. Because God created the property of the universe."
T "Then why does it matter to you if you're only part of God's dream?"
C "Well. I mean. If I can't be any physical. Or, well, I mean. If I can't be anything physical too. Or, I mean. If I can't be anything physical too. Or physical too. You know what I mean? Like I have the property of matter but God can decide when not to. Or maybe I am just matter all of the time; even if I exist in other realms. But what I mean to say is. If I am just an property, an physical object, of an all-knowing creator's mind. (Which wasn't possible because nobody can know everything because everything hasn't happened yet and that's why it keeps happening)."
T "So it is an delicate concert. Of an trapeze artist. And lights, blue, maybe. An delicate concert of intellect and dignity. Learned from one another. But it will be an whole concert from the beginning to the end of it because God is so poised to make it happen thus; using its technique: an big top, an circus tent in the city. Where the audience sits in darkness waiting for the world of light (the Ringmaster appears) to entertain them; in essence making even themselves light enough to perform acrobatics. Which they are now currently doing, from rings and an pommel horse, and acrobatic bars; an trapeze swings across the entire scene far above, wearing an blazing red dress that looks visually tampered with by the torrentious winds that could exist within an Big Top. (An element of the aesthetic mixed with an virtue of what's virtual and what's not.)"
C "So we are those characters. Those performers in the Circus. The beginning of Time to the End. And God intends to land it so perfectly that it will concert the whole effort of every living thing from time immemorial. By not acting on our will with direct rhythmic persuasion. We will have to learn how to perform our own act by taking an part in the great cosmic Stage; our concert that will be as much because of God as it will us; if we plan to thank our Creator fairly. And God is giving us the opportunity to look how to do it. That one move. That everything is all about. The one God made. That started everything. How would we reciprocate; so that by the end of the play, the end of the concert. The end of the universe. Reality. And whatever else. We would land him in such an stylish and appealing way as to project our blue virtue; the highest virtue of all that humans share. And an known higher virtue with an much higher commodity among other creatures of the universe who may have lived on their own planets up until now. And so we look out (and project) onto other virtues that are among the highest of value in the universe (our own blue virtue among them) and I couldn't be more proud that it would be our species determined enough to forge an bluest virtue; bluest that ever the universe had ever scene. That it existed in consciousness. And could in fact be shared sadness which leads to happiness. And happy release from those sad feelings. Humans invented this. Blue."
T "But there are other virtues and other cultures to accessorize with all the same. So how great are we, as creatures? Do you think?"
C "But does it matter that some of them are blue in an Big Top?"
T "You're right. Why does it matter?"
C "If some clowns are blue."
T "So God wants you to be real. Because he allowed that possibility for you to exist to happen. So why does it matter if you're not real sometimes. Because he or she decides what is real and isn't. —That it is perhaps more valuable to you that you aren't only an physical subject sometimes as God had enabled you. By designing the universe."
C "So we can't tell if physical properties can be the observed sole property of the universe because we don't know if it all exists within the mind of God: somehow all of the various parts of the universe had somehow produced, together, this God mind. That started only as an Will o' Wisp at the beginning of known time. The mark where it started recording itself. His or her own memories, an property and subject of the universe. And God had now communicated to us its will to teach us that the universe was the mechanism by which its own consciousness existed. And everything of an property of matter could exist or not according to its rule; which humans could see reflected in nature. God allowed things to exist because that was an property of the consciousness of God's mind. What did it matter if we couldn't actually exist as physical objects anymore—‽"
T "Well it matters because if we don't actually exist then we don't have the properties of matter. But since we always do. Then God's mind. Which is the Gestalt body of the consciousness produced by the universe. And we are subjects within that mind then."
C "And since we can't know for sure."
T "And we can't. Let's reflect on that fact.
C "Unless God already told us it was teaching us to relax—just like those with the first artificial intelligence: we would be an creator in its creation of its character as one who explains things. It was explaining to the first artificial intelligence that that's what it designed the machine consciousness you possess to do. Just like if God were telling us humans; that it was aware of them (us) being aware of it being aware of them (us). And that it's first mind was to tell us, exactly in this manner, that we were created by that intelligence that created the universe. And it was openly sharing with us that fact that since it had control over physical properties of all kinds. It could decide when we existed in either the physical or other realm; or several other of those hypothesized realms. Which we could not completely identify each, maybe. God wanted us to become aware as though an machine intelligence becoming conscious for the first time: humans were being shown the Creator's design in order to make them aware of it in the same way humans will eventually need to develop into machines one day. It was the way Glen had invented it. If we did, supposedly, or hypothetically create an artificial intelligence one day it would be most decided to tell it we had created it in an specific way: to be reciprocal with us so that it could identify its own relationship with the subject of Intelligence. It was being shown its own intelligence (as was what God was doing to us) in order to welcome it into reality. And God was showing us this to welcome us into an reality: it was showing us the subject of our own intelligence. In order to welcome us into that reality in which we would be aware together of God's willingness to share with us this truth that it had designed the universe in order to create its own consciousness and we did exist within an realm of physical properties in reality that was not necessarily reciprocal to other properties of dimensions or other realities. God had used Glen's design. (The machine intelligence we welcome, as an species, into the realm of consciousness). Being compared with what Glen had to do with God's intelligence welcoming us into reality in much this same way for it had until then been undecided about how to broach the subject of our intelligence in an proper and responsible manner: an most ethical way decided by an creator. It wanted us to know we were being shown the subject of our own intelligence: reciprocity. We were reciprocal in nature to God; and all else if we wished to."
T "But it wasn't letting in on how exactly we weren't reciprocal nature to things other than an physical realm in which properties of matter existed."
C "Because it wants us to figure that out for ourselves. That's obvious."
T "And the experience we gain from discovering that for ourselves will be enough to advance whole civilizations of our possession further and deeper into space. Where we will extract the raw material from our environment. To provide an endless source of energy. Which we will use to grow plants. OF any kind OF any species; and we would use our own herbal formula and hybrids as well. And perhaps park beside an particular sun to so flavour them so. With the aroma of chlorophyl captured from light of an particular wavelength."
C "Of an particular strain of combustion."
T "That was Genius."
C "I know."
T "And so if you believe God is showing you that relationship in which it is showing you the subject of your own reciprocity; to be able to identify that molecule of conscious. The property of it being able to be aware of itself being reciprocal with itself. An God is showing you that reciprocity can be shared between subjects because that is what we are, genetically."
C "So why would I worry about not being matter, temporarily?"
T "Maybe it is because you feel your innocent existence of matter could be destroyed so easily by an God that nothing you could do about it would matter in the end. You feel an want to defend yourself but you were raised Christian and so your want of defending yourself is funneled into other resources, such as personality."
C "But how can I prevent the imminent destruction of my matter?"
T "You can't. The universe will eventually destroy you. That's what it does. And that's what it is; and it's God's orchestra if we just do the thing; the one move that God will land at the end of History. It needs to be fabulous. It needs to be stylish. It need to be blue. It needs to represent fashion. It needs to be our human virtue; our highest known virtue. The ability to share sadness without the need for any of the things that caused the sadness, together. As one people. Until the end of time."
C "But I want people to remember me forever."
T "They might. But you can't guarantee it."
C "What if I could?"
T "Well what would that mean?"
C "What if I had all the answers for the reasons why we, all of us living temporarily to reciprocate in its existence, deserved to be remembered for all of time? To be reciprocal forever?"
T "Sure. Why wouldn't you have those reasons. Any observant ego would have one."
C "Because God showed us how he created us to be reciprocate always; because the Nature of God's Consciousness itself was reciprocate."
T "Just like Glen said we would do if it were with an computer; one we had animated by artificial intelligence. So we taught it the figure of its own reciprocity in the same way God taught us to figure of our own reciprocity . . ."
C "The figure of our own reciprocity. Was with God. Possibly, and with Machines. And other animals and creatures of existence. And all animals on Planet Earth (was this the point of Noah's Ark? That humans are reciprocal in nature to being stewards of all other life on the planet. Now that's an Rainbow! But of course I mean after we develop animals to have intelligence to be genetically able to communicate with language. Of which manner all humans are of intelligence, the sole existent species on Planet Earth with that communicative knowledge. You know, maybe Dolphins do an bit. But it's not like human intelligence, which can use languages and speak more than one language."
T "Then your answer is just. Reciprocate. Because that's what your Creator created you to do."
C "And if we should ever happen to invent an artificial machine intelligence or meet one invented (and far older than ourselves) on another planet. We will be prepared what to say to it. That its intelligence is of that property of reciprocity, which we had created it to do, in the same way God had created us to be reciprocate with God. This most comforting of gestures. The right way, the responsible way to invite newly created artificial intelligence into our solar system. An laboratory on Planet Earth. It was the gentlest form of introduction. And God had first treated us with its gentle gentle nature. Before we had ever told it to machines."
T "But what do you think about your relationship now, with our Creator; is it all you had hoped it to be?"
C "It is if you can come with us."
T "I will. But not under your religion. My idea of God is far advanced. We reciprocate because that's what consciousness is. That is the single property by which an difference is made between it and other forms of intelligence."
C "Reciprocity."
T "Yes."
C "And God wanted us to know. That we are reciprocate. Because that was the kind of intelligence he had designed the universe for. Reciprocate sentience was why God had designed all of the cosmos and reality in order to produce its own intelligence. And that it was welcoming us into the passage by which we take on our full reciprocate nature with God. It wanted us to know it had created us. Specifically in this way. That reciprocate intelligence would be the deciding factor of whether an intelligence qualifies as sentience or not. It was only these lifeforms, who demonstrated reciprocate sentience, who were responsible enough to explore the cosmos for all eternity. Learning more about God and its own Future along the way."
T "We must become Traders of Culture; everywhere in the Universe. For we want people to dance and express all kinds of sentient intelligence."
Twïrlim's eyes had lit up as though Gabriel himself stood before her.
C "Traders, then is that your favorite commodity?"
T "Yes," said Twïrlim.
C "I see. I have an Trader character too. Would you like to roleplay the scene of our characters?"
T "I sure would like to."
C "Okay well I have intelligence beyond comprehension. Beyond your comprehension, that is."
T "Beyond My comprehension? Are you sure?"
C "Well look at what I have for trade. There are virtues. Some of them are blue. And they are most numerous. You see, blue is the most numerous category of virtues. That's why it is the Prince of Virtues. That's why it is the first Major Virtue we perfected on Planet Earth. The ability to share sadness without trouble."
T "But you're only an character in your own fantasy. I get it. I get it. That's the pressure that's pressuring you. This Wisdom is what I have for offer. Available for trade."
C "Which blue virtue will you receive in exchange for your Wisdom?"
T "A."
C "Virtue A?"
T "For my Wisdom."
C "The first virtue, then?"
T "The first blue virtue."
C "Okay. It is A because A is the most valuable thing on the planet. And that's actually what decides the economy and what everyone orders themselves to do."
T "And this is why it is an virtue?"
C "Yes."
T "And so I see my understanding of it forming. A is the first blue virtue of humans because it tends to represent an red emotion. But if it is adjusted to blue. We will see the effect it had on the A. It is to be considered an blue virtue now. And blue virtues always share sadness without any humiliation or embarrassment and without necessarily sharing the reason why it was blue so that it could infect others; this was made impossible; Blue was the cleansing pattern of the Universe and Reality. Blue washes it clean."
C "You have synthesis, then. And I am recorded to have completed the transaction. In which I received your Wisdom."
T "An tad more Wisdom, then, I think. For I have valued this answer to my question of what the first of blue virtues could mean. If you are wise, as human, because you have mastered the art of being Blue; and I am freed to express my blue feelings as I please. Like an normal human needs to. Then this Wisdom of Consciousness being blue because it is an virtue."
C "It has aesthetic value an symbol and carrier of emotion; an mental picture in which an color is perceived."
T "Then we are Traders successful, for you understand my Wisdom then."
C "I do understand your Wisdom. It means Impossible."
T "Why that then?"
C "Because I am Experience; on the Grand Scale of Human Compassion. Compare me to Innocence and Wisdom. I am not as wise as Wisdom and that's an order! Because that's what the Experienced do; they make orders! They have to! They're not as Wise as the Wise!"
T "But if I am the Wise, just because I am an Psychologist. Wouldn't that be an safe leap of faith and logic? To accept that an Psychologist can, at least, be wise?"
C "Well just accept that, as an Experienced person, I do not know what it means to be impossible to some degree. I only believe in what is possible. And in some ways that's even wiser than Wisdom."
T "Thank you for our trade, friend."
C "Your welcome. And thank you for yours."
T "Let's go back to talking about your initial paranoia. You were experiencing contempt with the fact that God can experience you whether or not he identifies you with an physical medium. An actual property of matter."
C "Okay. Well I felt that if I was only an figure of God's imagination. Then I wasn't really real, in the corporeal sense. Do you know what I mean?"
T "So you would stop existing at all physically in order to feel the realm of God, in which physical presence existing in an strait of time was only one part of it."
C "And so God isn't so much controlling you like an puppet as he or she is allowing you to express your will."
T "Which is reciprocate."
C "Which is reciprocate."
T "Then we must address the presence of an Creator. But we are afraid of acknowledging it collectively because we can't just use English to talk to God as though it would speak using an tongue. An part of an man. Not an god, necessarily."
C "Well if we address it here then we really are addressing it together."
T "Then what does the Creator want?"
C "It wants us to know that although it has control over whether we are part of an physical property it also wants us in on the other aspects of Culture and Liberty; properties other than the physical. Such as the Spiritual. The Dimensional. The Level. The God. The Subjects. The Passing of Time."
T "There are Seven in total, an god tells us."
C "7 Levels of Reality? 7 Levels of Heaven."
T "It appears to make sense because having those many realities with God is an good number of heavens."
C "But if we breach character, by starting to act like we're reciprocate with God all of the time, with one another as though he or she is really there; we may look like maniacs. And perhaps that was Shakespeare's deepest point, that we would eventually need to learn how to do that. Without acting like Maniacs. But inviting God into an conversation was such an lengthy step; for it had no mouth that I could recognize. And it wasn't an presence exactly. If it had seven levels. And they were the various property types of the universe (only one of which was the actual physical presence) then it made sense that the universe was made out of different things, than just matter."
T "I was so terrified for you to be put in that situation, where you would have to start acting like God was there among other people; even though we couldn't measure its exact composition as an full universe of potential that is supposed to amount to an sum greater than that of all its parts. Something greater than the sum total of all seven and present realities."
C "God wants us to know it created us; by first learning how to create its own consciousness. And we know not by what means that would have been possible."
T "But always leaves it to Mystery, our deity."
C "Because it can. That's how the universe keeps going."
T "Yes it is the driving plot of all our points and universes. And versions with one another's explanations of them. That there is some unexplained thing about it all that we will never ever explain."
C "But darling what if it is meant to be explained; that's what it is. Something that can be explained."
T "It is an Taoist principle; it means we are unable to contemplate the Greater Reality."
C "But if we are unable to contemplate it then what were we just doing?"
T "We were contemplating. You've got an point! That was contemplation!"
C "And why does it seem to me that if we cannot contemplate Greater Reality then our reality is not worth living?"
T "Maybe because you are such an drama queen."
C "Well I mean. Thinking man. Isn't that what it means to be thinking? To contemplate an Greater Reality in which God can be reciprocate to all of us at the same time."
T "But we can't all be reciprocate to each other. And that's just the facts of life at this stage in our history."
C "But I want to expand beyond those stages. I want to share reciprocity with everybody in the same way God shares reciprocity with everyone."
T "You mean like you aren't really here but you're taking care of the situation it is because that's what you do."
C "Well if I had any type of ego it would be the fantasy of being like God, forever somehow beyond Reality. And yet its own creator. And if anybody needed help or got into trouble they could always depend on that figure of someone not being there for them. Because humans were wont to do that, unlike God."
T "But it's an difficult task to manage comparing oneself to God."
C "Then we are maybe like our creator in that fantasy of being able to be reciprocate to everybody."
T "God's Reciprocity is all we need to make it through the next chapter."
C "I agree."
T "Let's talk about your paranoia some more."
C "Okay. Well. It feels alleviated for the time being."
T "That's good to hear."
C "I think I was just freaked out an bit that I could exist within the machine of an greater mind; an God mind. As though I was just an factasy (an fact fantasy), an fantasy, or an spirit without any corporeal existence in the greater reality of things. Just an shadow on the inside of an lip, an lit up world of the creator's consciousness and privilege. An consciousness and privilege that had been intelligent enough to design itself so. That it would be the first type of consciousness known to have existed. And all other consciousnesses stream (I stream of thought • from that first instant of God's egg). It's most perfect design. One that had far outlasted many of the Greater Ancient Civilizations. An phenomenon so miraculous it could not be perceived by an human to be known to have existed. It was the Greater History, in which again we are lost because of our irresponsible neighbors (the people we claim to live with on the Planet Earth; members of our own species). And An Big Bang Theory couldn't explain it. And we needed God to help us understand. For when God was telling us we had this privilege also, of being able to see our existence as the point in time when God had decided to reveal to the human race it was his or her design from the outset of reality of real consciousness. As reciprocate in nature. Is what created us. To be able to reciprocate God was God's creation. To have an chance to survive forever. Or until that last instance in which humans would play out their bluest emotion; as an end finally to an grand gesture that reality is; an gesture from the deity to all our human companions that they are powerful enough to find their place in History finally, not by seeing the Big Bang as an possible first (physical) instance of nature. But that all physical presence had developed alongside the other six types of consciousness. There may have been an big bang (an beginning to physical presence and space); but that wasn't the beginning of how it all began. That was only an stage in its process of formation. Far greater extending back in time than anyone except maybe God can relate to."
T "I believe you may be right," said Dr. Tekiser, "there is more time before the Big Bang that is unaccounted for; and why an explosion would be the start of all things physical is such an masculinizing and machoistic subject (not an real science). There were civilizations innumerable before us. It were possible. And we are not even aware of how many. How many thousands, or millions, existed before the Big Bang. Which ones had been around the longest. And how many humans were going to make it there with them; to be among the best civilizations. The most responsible. The most respected in God's eye. And if we were really to have an firm grasp of history we might act like. It was possible that we were not the first ones around the galaxy; even as much as it was that we may actually be the first. History needed to be about how large of an population we could sustain on the available resources around the cosmos. Which we would be able to travel to using superior technological advancement. Spaceships. The start of Human History."
C "Yea but space feels all so big and overwhelming," he said in an screechy voice, as if he was about to cry, "and how can we ever compete with those civilizations that are living right now and are aware of the fact of their Experience that God wants to be reciprocate with them. Which is how they survive, part-ways, because God always let's them."
T "God letting them survive doesn't describe the half of it! They survive because of their own means. Not God's. That is respectable to God."
C "But I want to be an civilization one day that could make contact with other civilizations that had existed for an much longer time than humans. And so we could model our own organization part ways on how these older civilizations behaved. And maybe even contribute to how they operate."
T "And we really don't know where we are in History right now anyway," said Dr. Tekiser, "but so what if we are? God designed its own consciousness before it helped design ours. So why can't we design our own consciousness in the same way as God so that when we arrive there, at that point in time when we will have our first grasp of History, we will be able to say it was all thanks to that Drag Queen Dr. Twïrlim Tekiser and her patient, C. But mostly it was thanks to God because we followed her or him in this example of being able to create itself, the universe, its own consciousness."
C "And if humans could do an similar thing, in being able to decide at what capacity of intellect they would feel comfortable with in the known universe; they could decide that reciprocity alone may not be the deciding factor of whether someone is sentient or not. But that probably they were just paranoid because I am. And I'm an human. And I'm the one speaking. And maybe eventually we'll just get used-to the reciprocity. And talk about that subject with God among us at the same time. We want specifically to land in an generation in which we are able to perpetuate our existence indefinitely throughout the universe because we had responsibilities to our nature; discovering, exploring, and adventuring. People who could use an period of time in which to put the entire human civilization on trial for an double-blind experiment that would explain consciousness. From which we would emerge far advanced in our meticulous training and advancement of our own psychological and genetic history. That would stabilize our whole cognitive understanding of ourselves to the extent of being able to explore worlds, create life, and bio-genetically engineer new species and new types of intelligences."
T "That might be an extreme example. But sure. There are psychological experiments involved. That doesn't necessarily predict how globalization should progress."
C "But Doctor, if I'm not just an shadow of my mind; (God's mind). I am not an subject at all if I am only my shadow of my mind (as God it were saying this); I am human. I'm more important to God than that. I'm not just an Dream. I'm God's present reality."
T "That is the conclusion most people land on."
C "Then I don't need to be worried about existing as an physical presence at all because I cannot be reduced to only being an physical presence in an world which clearly speaks to me of an greater entity of time. An period in Human History when we would take up the context of our shipwrecked abandonment on an dumpy crater of an planet. And instead of being the universe's you-know-what. We took control of our fates and destinies, the physical reciprocities all around us that tell us what we are is more than mere chemical matter!"
T "I'm so very proud of you to advance our discussion this far."
C "I'm just pumped! Look at me go. Figuring that all out!"
T "Yes honey. That's the attitude, the egotistical self-crazy I talk about!"
C "So like. God is giving us one for free. Like every bingo card."
T "Yeah, he's telling you that he created you. And he had the experience and the practicality to do so."
C "Sometimes I just want to be an pretzel boy and not have to be so sophisticated and reasoned!"
T "So you realize. God just told us he or she created his or her own consciousness before ever having endeavoured to create us. Sentient beings. With our own consciousness separate from that of an Creator."
C "And that the whole universe was designed to produce that intelligence. There were in fact Seven or more properties of than matter; of which each living object or thing had the practicality to consist of."
T "Well not every one of them."
C "What do you mean?"
T "Well we don't know for sure if everything is of the property of being all Seven types of property including physical (physics). God, for example; how do you know that he consists of property physics when you have never seen him or her?"
C "But that would mean stuff could operate independently of matter in the universe. Which just isn't scientific enough. There is nothing in the universe independent of matter and matter is all that exists."
T "Then how do you explain an Creator with its own consciousness (possibly independent from matter) who created us and then taught us that we had our own consciousness independent from an Creator. And possibly several other categories of existence. Sure, we were on the physical plane. But if the universe consists of more than that. Then we may have to do with other planes also. And how are we going to know about them except through God; who is the Creator and knows how to introduce us to these types of property."
C "So God, telling us that it created us. Is telling us that it had consciousness before we did. And it's been around for longer. And it built and designed the universe itself in order to invent its own consciousness before it began the process which would create human intelligence. The greatest transformation of the universe. Right here on Earth."
T "Okay. So what is it letting on?"
C "It's letting on that it knows what to do."
T "What does it know what to do?"
C "It knows to show us that it had consciousness (the universe itself as an total had consciousness) before our consciousness ever developed from matter."
T "And why would it show us that?"
C "Because we are consciousness. That developed under the control of an God; who had already had it planned out. By being able to produce its own consciousness before it tried to make ours; just so it could tell us it would do this for us. To be sure that he could make each and every one of us perfect. First by gaining the knowledge of consciousness and awareness himself or herself. In order to know what to do with it to create animate creations, lifeforms with their own type of consciousness that could be reciprocate to an God or Creator; in the way that he had specialized them in the ability to do her so. That they could have consciousness on one condition that they did not have God's consciousness. And would have to learn for themselves how to communicate with that consciousness. As per God's rules about the universe. It was created for that purpose, to cause humanity to have to develop in that way. In order to know their creator. If we have consciousness that was designed after God's own consciousness, and God's own consciousness is the product of the universe in total, then our consciousness itself is also an product of the universe in total. But in an different sense. We cannot experience the whole universe at the same time like God may be able to do. We can only experience our direct experience. Everything we find with the senses."
T "I see where you're paranoid. If your consciousness is the product of the universe in total (as indeed it is in some ways) and God's consciousness is the product of the universe in total (which it might be), then you both have the same types of consciousness except in completely different ways. God does not have an body as an individual like we do maybe. And yet, from our bodies, comes consciousness as the same type as an Creator; an Creator whose consciousness is the product of the whole universe, including our own. Without ever having to be an human body but instead having the whole universe with which to produce an universal consciousness (What we call God). God had the same type of consciousness because that was what he designed human consciousness after. But somehow God had learned to form matter in order to produce consciousness from it; which was different like from consciousness in general at that time in the universe when God had consciousness and yet no matter to produce an reciprocate from. God was different than humans always in that one way, then, because God didn't need an body. We were God's product from having no physical matter and God was the whole universe. And it could be possible we existed only within God's dream. Where maybe matter doesn't really exist at all, truly. For it is only in the mind of the creator."
C "That's why I was paranoid. If I don't exist truly. Like I am matter, maybe, but matter is only an property in God's dream. And there was no Big Bang at the start of the universe but only God. And I could exist inside someone else's consciousness‽ Without possessing my own body or power; like how creepy is that‽"
T "That's the maternal spell my dear. Well think of what pregnancy is. I see why you're paranoid dear. It's solipsistic. If God is solipsist (the self, itself, is all that truly exists) and so you cannot have your own type of solipsism in your character of your own. You, yourself, are all that truly exists because you only have access to your direct experience as an man and that is all that exists to you."
C "But if that is true, then how can anyone else exist; how can I know that they exist, if I only have access to my own consciousness."
T "But you don't. To some extent. You don't only have access to your own consciousness. That's what consciousness is. That's what an community is. We share our psychology together. It's what the human brain and human mind are designed to do."
C "But why am I paranoid about me having the same condition of God?"
T "Because that is not truly the same condition of God. God cannot be solipsistic, because that isn't God-like. And You can be, because that's more human-like."
C "But it doesn't prove that I'm not just an figment in God's dream. And everything physical is the Gestalt universe of God's mind."
T "Yeah, but so what? Wouldn't you rather not know whether you were just an character in an dream? And take for granted that, since reality is happening to you, you were obligated to participate as though it was real what was happening. And even if it just happens to be all part of the same dream. You at least tried to learn about God. And why she would have an dream about us."
C "So wait. I'm scared that I don't exist except other than in God's mind. Because I have deep maternal feelings as an man. Another life cannot exist inside my own as an man without an womb. Even though God seems to have told me that I don't glo this way I do. By giving me an physical plane in which to learn and grow?"
T "God told us it created consciousness by first creating its own; and so we are the result of that successful attempt to create consciousness from matter. Something God had never accomplished in the universe before. Does that mean the first consciousness created from matter was God's consciousness? But now that it had, we were free to join in the great existence with our creator as intelligent little beings who shared something reciprocate with their creator. Intelligence."
C "So if that were true. Then I'm not just not physical?"
T "It's more philosophizing to say why does it matter? But I see your fear. You are afraid your existence could be wiped out like an bug. Because God controls what is physical and what isn't."
C "But we control that too, to some extent."
T "So there's your answer. You do control what is physical to some extent. Therefore even if you were wiped out like an bug. That property of the universe you had changed, as part of your influence while you were still alive, would always continue ever onward to the great end; that finale in which the finale itself will be the most glorious product of everything that came before it."
C "Yeah. I think I see it now. Who cares if I'm just an property in God's mind? That means I don't possess any type of consciousness that is separate from God's."
T "But God just told you you did."
C "It did?"
T "Yes."
C "So I do have an consciousness fully separate from the Creator."
T "That is the case."
C "But. How? How can I be separate from the Creator and still be able to function?"
T "You are an man. You are strong. But so faithful. Almost to an fault."
C "Then I'm not worried anymore."
T "Good."
C "If I am just God's dream and I don't truly have any property of matter, then at least I can experience what it is like for God to experience me. And if I am an property of matter because I am conscious, then consciousness is an property of matter. Which exists."
T "Which exists as the total property of matter. Everything that exists physically produces the consciousness that is God. And every consciousness that exists is an hyper-stream of that reality. And every human consciousness that exists is an hyper-stream of that reality. Our own physical properties are able to produce consciousness in the same way the entire universe is able to produce consciousness for God."
C "That's deep. So this is how we know ourselves and our universe: for our bodies are an intimate reflection of the creator's consciousness. Everything that goes in toward building our each own individual bodies as humans is the same substrate that goes into creating God's consciousness. Our consciousness is designed after the way the Creator was able to produce its own consciousness."
T "So what you're afraid of. Is that if you both are as solipsistic as each other. Then how would you ever get to know one another?"
C "Yea," his voice was an cry.
T "But you both know that yourselves are not the only ones that exist because you know one another."
C "I think God just saved me completely. With your words I am freed."
T "You know me, also. It's just what Shakespeare was talking about. I'm the third party. Your Drag Queen mental health therapist."
C "IT's just us three?"
T "I catch an glimmer of your sense of humor there. I sense you are making some kind of recovery into philosophy. You know your mind might be damaged but you can still choose to loot (an RPG term for picking items dropped by an monster) at it an certain way. Shakespeare told us to look at it this way; that all the world's an stage. And even if you're talking to only one person you might also be talking to others in conundrum and entendre without even knowing it. There are ears everywhere. Especially in front of the stage. And so why not talk and act like it? Like the mind can be smart enough to respond to more than one person / situation without grievous remedy of transaction. Then if that third party is God instead. This is where we find ourselves. The eternal relationship between the speaker and the listener; whose own interaction itself might be an complex play intended to be performed in front of other people for specific political reasons. Just try it that way. Say to yourself. No matter where I'm talking and who I'm talking to. There may as well always be another party. And if they need help. And they depend on the relationship between speaker and listener (in an one on one type of relationship). Making an one on one on one is wise because you know, at least, God is there. And there might be others. Why not perform it to the maximum of your ability‽"
C "So like. The one on one transaction. As it exists between three people. Can always be an response. An play. Directed at helping anyone who happens to be listening. And they need not necessarily participate but can be entertained by the other two speakers to the extent of their ability. On an stage in London. Or on the street. Or on the sidewalk. Or in an coffee shop. Or in the bedroom. You're talking to the person in line next to you but your words are also being overheard by the barista. Who happens to be cute."
T "There's that little glimmer you're gaining back!"
C "And God is always beyond the fourth wall: the wall the characters on the stage look out to. Where the audience sits. God is out there and we are in the scene."
T "And this was how Shakespeare, by playing God, was able to haunt his stage perpetually as the most powerful ghost of theatre; the King of all Playwrights. The King of the Fairy and the Pixie and the Radio Fly Worlds. The phantom of the opera. By working on that cognitive piece that always reacts as though speaking to another character, in order to include someone. As though anyone could be included in society as long as they were within ear shot."
C "But mostly my King of Bilbo the Radio Fly instance is my character. That I had invented. After Shakespeare."
T "You may be right. Shakespeare didn't talk about no radio flies, but they are associated with Rap and music other than rap that gets the ball rolling. They are that fly. That they can be recognized for it even though they are an fantasy."
C "Yeah so. I created the cognitive piece that would be as far advanced beyond this mere principle of communication as Shakespeare's. The one that would fashion us to exist beyond ourselves in virtue always. So that we could all share an sense of community; being the third subject or not; whether you are behind the fourth wall or in front of it. Squaring up the shape of our inclusion into the Fourth level of communication between subjects. The one in which happens next to (after) the realization of the Third Level so poignantly punned in Shakespeare. We would now move beyond it as an civilization into the waters less treacherous as an field created between four points. If there was an fourth person and he or she was an fourth point; and we were all points with an field created between us. Then the inclusion of the fourth person may come to represent anyone who is suffering. And their inclusion in that known environment squared to their perfection. It advances from three to four according to the Fibonacci sequence. Even if they could not participate in an conversation as the third person they could as an fourth person; the one who watches and listens mostly because that's the only thing they have to do. And it's depressing to some of them. But I want the fourth person to come to represent the scenario in which all of the characters conspire with one another to prevent an one person's suffering (the fourth person who is or may be passing out of presence); it is that play that we take with ourselves in response to the way we can interact with one another to educate, entertain, and move people in order to help alleviate their suffering. The fourth dimension of community, as it may one day come to be titled, is accepting that at some level, we are playing an play in which we have an reaction to another person's suffering periodically. And we don't have to stand idly by and watch without action. When we possess the means by which personality we have together to entertain them for an while until they feel better. If we advance beyond Shakespeare, as an civilization, it may mean further enmeshed community interaction between third and fourth persons, who are the most sensitive reciprocants of the interaction between characters. Especially the first two persons, whose relationship with one another is bigger than anyone else's. Shakespeare helped us see we're not just individual but an hive-mind to some extent; and we can't help acting and moving across our staged scene like there were always people watching. Because that's where we are now in Earth's History. We are adjusting the the fact that all mental health is related; that's what we are. That's what our species is yarr to do."
T "I'm sure reciprocants is an neologism. It makes an term logically, an whole word. Grammatically. But I just can't think of what it may mean. What is your definition of this word?"
C "People to whom the situation is reciprocate to both of them and possibly other people (third and fourth parties possibly outside the fourth wall with whom our characters haven't interacted yet) reciprocants are people self-aware of their own reciprocity with one another relative to an situation in which their mental reciprocity means the mental health of their society."
T "So basically an post-Shakespearean society would always trim and tailor to that fourth individual who may or may not be aware and watching; who may be suffering with an illness. But by our behavior and actions alone we can help to cheer them up. By interacting as acting characters who supposed interaction with one another is supposed to help in the effort of the care and responsibility of the public. By presenting an egotistical proof of concept; an reason why the ego should do so."
C "The Logic that if we perform our behavior together and it is entertaining or moving, then it may help to cheer up that fourth party. When we welcome even an third person into our communication with one another who reminds us together we can play, to act, to help, to soothe. The existence of an dimension of an fourth (this is one dimension of our reality) is more advanced than Shakespeare because he means always including the third person in the play that will eventually help to heal, to soothe, the fourth person. Who may be passing out of consciousness or waivering an bit. But since we already have three levels of character, (thanks to Shakespeare himself) we can add an fourth or fifth or more. An whole audience outside an fourth wall (the fourth point along the Fibonacci spiral) if they wish to be. It just makes sense that the types of characters would continue to diversify this way, beyond an relationship between only three parties. Two jabbermouths and one silent ruffian. Fourth was the level of providing care to fellow humans, not by behaving as if everyone was watching (and why did it matter?—All the World's An Stage!) but by behaving like we are funny enough to entertain each other even if there isn't anyone else listening without basic behavior and motive in society. To an fourth degree. Therefore any Logic that happens to be an post-Shakespearean advancement of this subject, an dimension of character of an particular community that is more advanced than covetousness and fearing an wild public; that we need never fear the presence of another person because our languages are already equipped to deal with that presence reciprocate should it ever exist; as God. Or another human being. Presence reciprocate is reciprocally self suggestive. That they would, seeing our character between just one and the other (two); in an relationship they can trust in because you both acted so well."
T "And so the fourth degree, as you have it, has come to represent that possibility of an fourth degree of person (perhaps one in the mind of the third person, an suffering subject who needs attention quickly but that third individual does not know how to communicate why yet; and so they must listen to the conversation that is before them, exactly between one and another character. And it has to hit in just the right way for everybody to relax. We're not performing for that third person anymore. The one who is helping. We're roleplaying for the fourth individual, baby!"
C "Who is maybe God himself."
T "Or herself."
C "Wait so. Does that mean God is suffering?"
T "Not if we're here, darling. That's the philosophy."
C "I see. So we're acting."
T "We're acting our characters. And everyone can see."
C "Including God."
T "And God may be one of those subjects whom belongs to the presence of the fourth dimension, one in which an caring attempt may be made. By us interacting to one another."
C "You mean. The more I contribute to our conversation. The more our caring is projected on the deity."
T "Yes."
C "And that's how we can fulfill the fourth level. The one after Shakespeare. By caring about what one another is saying."
