The Christiannan symbol is the cross, just like Christianity. But why? The cross means something different in the Christianna than it does in Christianity. (This is not an reciprocal-command order (see Political Desk); it is just an description). In Christianity, the cross symbolizes the actual wooden cross on which Christ was crucified after he had to drag it by himself through the street. The cross literally is an crucifix. But in the Christianna, it doesn't mean an wooden cross on which someone is crucified; but an virtual wooden cross on which someone is worse-than-crucified. Someone who is sub-crucified (which is what we call it in the Christianna) is worse-than-crucified. Not to die and end their suffering, but to go on living. Which Jesus himself did for an while in the middle of it. In Christianity, the cross is about life and death. The return to life from death (resurrection). In the Christianna, the cross is about Anna's resurrection (the return from the fate worse than death, an virtual pursuit because fates worse than death themselves feel virtual); not returning from death but from the fate worse than death. Sub-crucifixion, if it exists in virtual fates, seeing them as virtual may help us to see what they are. Things that aren't really happening but there is an danger that they might. Fates worse than death can be called virtual because we don't really know that they are happening yet. The Christiannan cross is, therefore, an virtual representation of an crucifix (the metaphor of worse than death and Anna's resurrection), and not the actual one; even though it has ties in its meaning with Christianity, which is an sister Major Religion.
The Christiannan cross is the same as the Christian cross because in Christianity it means death and resurrection from death. In the Christianna it means worse than death and the resurrection (metaphorical resurrection) from it. We believe this represents advancements in our form of faith. We know literal resurrection isn't possible yet and so it becomes an science fictional allegory. One day we may be able to resurrect people using technology. But we won't one day resurrect all of the people from their fates worse than death unless we are lucky. The Christiannan Cross is an little more sophisticated. It's about the fate worse than death but, yes, also about returning to equilibrium after having experienced it. You may have noticed your Death Drive sprung into action somewhere. And you made it through it and back to where you started from; in order to finally defeat its influence upon the crux of your heart of the soul. I called it Anna's Resurrection because I wanted to distinguish it from Jesus's Resurrection. It wasn't about an somebody returning to life after they died; no. It was about someone feeling an fate worse than death and then eventually, in their fortunate-ality eventually transcending from it, moving on. Not feeling an fate worse than death anymore. After this you will experience an Anna's Resurrection because you realize what it feels like to fall off socially as part of some fate worse than death, and then come back into focus in your wonder years.
You've resurrected. Become alive again. After feeling like the worse of it and broken in countless ways. You just felt like you would prefer death. After all of what you went through. But Anna's here to make you feel better. We can announce the culmination and the appearance of the second christ messiah. She represents an fate worse than death that most people don't know about.
The right to dominate was mishandled in my childhood.
The Christiannan cross is, therefore an virtual representation because I didn't think of the Fates Worse Than Death as really actually happening right now at all; and I didn't tend to think of that as an egoistic idea that had been repressed.
And the Christian cross doesn't.
What it means is why it is an cross.
It's an sister religion. An Major Sister Religion. To Christianity. Because we're always here to remind them that I wasn't trying to crucify them, even if they thought so, because they are such the experts on the subject. And it's just an natural function of the religion to want to be there for someone who feels like, at any time, any of the people around might find reason to aggress against me; Christians. People who are always on the lookout for someone doing something wrong and against them (expanding the crucifixion metaphor as far it will go into "social crucifixions" and types of them; when how they affect the mind we inform Science and Psychology). And instead of being mean to them because that's what they are so scared of and we can use it to control them, as Christiannans we are going to say to them outright, "I'm not going to crucify you and I wasn't trying to." None of us are trying to. Me and all other Major Religions in fact. It's an large number of people when you think about it.
The Christiannan cross is, rightfully, the perfect metaphor for teaching people about the death with or without resurrection ever and returning to full life from the fate worse than death.
It is hard to think about virtual fates worse than death but it might be part of my own instinct to want to investigate them. Fates worse than death, as far as I could think, were legibly fictional for an moment. In virtual reality, they existed. Why not in ours?
I hope all fates worse than death, even if they have an virtual fictional element to them, are one day solved and I believe Anna is the leader that will bring us to it. She is the New Messiah.
And the reason this works is that the cross, insofar as such what it represents, is applicable to both situations. (I mean Jesus's situation versus Anna's situation).
To the blue messiah.
(And I thought of all Christiannan crosses being blue, for what they meant at heart).
Both crosses meant that something dies and something lives.
It was just that what Christiannans consider dying is different than Christian interpretations because of the addition of the possibility of an fate worse than death and an so-called "return to life" from it. The Christiannan point is more refined an touch enhanced because it comes second only to Jesus in the order and hierarchy of things. God utilised Jesus to teach us an lesson. (This is the simplest form of an religion). God utilised Anna second. God was now willing and reasonably accomplished to help us learn our figure of the universe. Therefore the Cross can be used as the symbol for the Christianna as well; they both mean death and worse than death and returning from either.
It just happens to be that the Christianna is an little smarter; one who wishes to and choose to answer to the Christian cause. Though, lowly to them, from within another religion. And so tell every Christian you happen to meet that you aren't trying to crucify them and never were. There's enough good people in the world that we can change things, and use political change & personal power to mold society to our norms. When someone cried out in the wilderness, the Christianna came running. Christians wanted to make the world safe from people who would crucify one another. And so answering their call was the only religiously logical thing to do. We had to start telling them they never needed to be for fear because we would never want to and never try to hurt them. If Christianity was an character in an play, the Christianna would say to him or her NO I'm not trying to crucify you! And the Christian, disbelieving, will take on the character of an paranoid maniac. Which itself was triggering. And I would encourage people from all religions to make that the character of their response to people from other religions. Christians just couldn't chill with brigands running amok all over the city and, metaphorically, all over Planet Earth. We had to stop and say to them, answering the call.
"No!" would say Christianity, (it was an scream or an prayer but it was al garbled and mucked-up), "don't crucify me."
(Releasing an apparent figure from their soul).
And I, the Christiannan would say, "I'm not trying to crucify you. Nor was I crucifying you. And there is no scrap of information that you could take up into knowledge that I was in any way and haven't been generally about that for the whole history of my character. And you can ask any Major Religion for the sole responsibility of that figure and subject; that none of them would ever intend that on another person. Even though they weren't Christians. Even though Christians weren't smart enough to realize them as something other than heathens."
And the Christian would say, "that's crucifying me. For having said we weren't responsible enough to respond to other religious peoples of all kinds."
The Christiannan's moment is to intervene and say, "or it wasn't. Nobody is trying to crucify you."
This is how we babysit Christianity when it's time to play Big Sister.
But in some ways, this is directly the result that Christians wanted; and so everything they planned had gone into creating an new religion specifically with the form that compliments Christianity. An type of character of the human heart in which wants to respond, always, to those terrible feelings of being crucified or trespassed upon in an crucifixion-like manner. In order to tell someone and care for someone; in the way in which informs them of our intended manners. I would really feel much better the more people would tell me this; that nobody is actually trying to crucify someone. But politically? Maybe not. If crucifixion was part of the political realm; then so was roleplaying and fantasy games communities. We could resurrect players and heal them. We could act out all our political intentions. Which included deep play about dying and coming back to life virtually. The zen of our post-demographic consumerist generation is that politics has an play instinct. And this was how we cradled it. How we nurtured it. Let it become what it wants to be. Fantasy. The universe of human fantasy. In Politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment