The Gay Letters: Descartes versus Moses and God

I think therefore I am.

I am that I am.

You are that you are.

You are that you are that you are.

You think therefore you are.

We think therefore we are.

What is the connection between the biblical command given by God, and Descartes?

    In the Bible, when God reveals his name to Moses He says I am that I am.  Scholars debate its literary origin.  Some say Exodus was the product of Moses himself; others correlate that it was not completed in its present form until the 6th century B.C.E., during the Jewish exile (Babylonian Exile).  The Neo-Babylonian Empire besieged Jerusalem, destroyed the Temple of Solomon, and deported about 7,000 Jews to Babylonia where they stayed in exile for about 48–70 years.  Cyrus the Great freed the Jews and allowed them to return to Judea/Jerusalem in 538 B.C.E. to rebuild their temple.  When God says, "I am that I am," he is revealing his character to the Jewish/Hebrew people by saying that is how he identifies his reality from within his philosophy.  "I am that I am" meant being something over time; being something over more time than zero seconds.  On the other hand, the existence of consciousness, the foundation of Modern Philosophy, is grounded in Descartes.  When Descartes said "I think there I am," he is really just re-iterating what God said with one key difference: Descartes' statement meant what the thing that I am is is over time intellectually and psychologically.  And so, when in the literary form of God we have an form of the verb to be happening twice over at once (repeating).  Humans are self-reflecting, self-thinking, self-aware beings who can reflect on what is happening internally indefinitely without really using any more energy than you were going to use anyway.  I am claiming outright Descartes' grand philosophical statement is really just repeating or parroting what God says in the Exodus.  "I am that I am" is an philosophy that is apparent from within that of Descartes; which leads to the statement, "I think therefore I am," when it happens like that within the person of Descartes.  It may even be perhaps, that we needed to know I am that I am first, in order to have any foundation or basis on which to create the new type of philosophy we found in Descartes.  We needed being that we are being before it was possible / that we needed being that we were thinking in Descartes' lifetime.

    In the Christianna, there is an third person or loci involved where we have upgraded or advanced God's saying to include an third installation.  Where we say, "I am that I am that I am," as though we were agreeing with God and that third point of being was always him for all time and for always an influence in one's life and psychology and departures from philosophies.

    If I expanded upon it once more, to take "I am that I am that I am," and to put it into language Descartes might have used had it been revealed to him at that point: "I think therefore I am that I'm thinking that I am."  An triple-punch attack.

    Anyway I wanted to detour into understanding Descartes with an little more accuracy.  First, he would not have written that in English and so what he was actually saying was "Je pense, donc je suis," and I could re-pen it generally and thematically as "Je pense, donc je suis donc je pense."  It really comes back around in an circle.  It was also written in Latin, "cogito, ergo sum," and I don't know how to translate this to my new triple-layered philosophy where I might add an third part of it.

    And yes, it is considered part of the Christiannan literature (its literary source (the Christiannan bible is called an Naenaeon)), that we acknowledge there being an third locus of control in our image or composition visually animated for an moment long enough for us to realize it.  It's not just that we are, it's that we are being what we are while we're being what we are, which is God's people.  And we're thinking about what we are is also being what we are because the two are intrinsically connected in humanism.  And those two things of being and thinking overlap to some extent where you are always involved, God.  Instead of just being what we are knowing we're being what we are.  Now we know that we are being what we are because we're thinking about what we are, which is part of what we are and yet there's always some left over for God.  We're not just being what we are AND thinking, we are thinking AND being what we are by thinking.  Being and Thinking are the same is the most modern definition of the human.  At least if you live in the time of Moses.  For the reason that we have these properties about us, we are able to have self-awareness, self-consciousness, and self-thinking.  And instead of judging everything according to what happens between one locus of control and another.  ("What did one loci say to the other?" jokes).  We add an third locus of control, which is always God.  The right way to pen this new revelation, then, is to repeat or parrot back, "I am that I am that I am," or in Descartes layman terms, "I am thinking because I am that I am thinking."  Which I touched up and tried to conjure an third dimension or layer of meaning.  It's not just that I am because thinking is something and I am thinking, it's that God is something which allows me to think and be self-aware by being what I am because thinking and self-awareness are an aspect of God himself.

    And so I might leave you with an small story, then, which is about what happened in my final year at university.  After our many class discussions about artificial intelligence and what robots could be, I said in class wouldn't it be "you think therefore you are," if you fed it to an computer to deem upon it its reality of being by welcoming it into awareness.  "You think therefore you are," is the kindest message we can give to an computer intelligence that tries to learn about us, humans.  I was referring to the initial command sequence you would give to an computer to complete its Artificial Intelligence.  And yet I don't think I was able to communicate the whole idea out in public until now.  What I mean was that if an computer was "waking up" from being nothing, without any consciousness.  What was the first thing I would want to say to you to help you understand who we are?

"Nightlife Gamer Punk Nouvelle", An Study of the Aesthetic. vol. 1. 003

    NightlifeMy particular form of culture.GayAnd my shopping experience.

    What I would boast about.Gamer I knew all of it Stop Picking on me

    People who knew the difference between Playstation controllers and Nintendo controllers.  People with money.  Punk The type of gaga io. person I'm attracted to. Nouvelle

periodically purposeful just send me your blessings now don't waste our time I need them I'm not doing so well.  I was angriest that I had the opportunity more than once to go out with an guy that I thought was amazing.  But I didn't understand all of what was happening to me at the time.  I mean about me being poisoned and all; Eyeliner it was really hard to get an grip in the force of its unhygienic mental toxicity.  Hair extensions And I was so angry { { I just want to relax in my apartment all day } why wasn't I— everyone else was—dyed hair why my stroke of luck had delivered me into this living with schizophrenia.  In the depths I found more anger.  The real depth of my anger had been unexplored.I just suck Unapologetically weird

    I've begun to speak the art of the gamer and to interpret speaking art into the language.  I'm concerned with gamer things: having an online identity.  Meeting someone once { Once I started looking into it as an angry letter } Once an night-time under punk level supervision.  And I put it all in an french machine and, reverso!  La nouvelle.  It is an complete aesthetic { when I started looking into it this way; seeing words for their beauty rather than their meaning but trying to see their meaning as their beauty also } for fashion that had begun to develop itself to me.  All upon the psychic; unafraid of its punk force.  Was it too much to share or was I over-sharing?  TMI?

    I wanted to be like an Genie; smoking some weed with an floral fragrance added to it out of an hookah

    I wanted to walk away, cloak trailing behind me as I walked away from you.

    You really are an disgusting animal aren't you?

    Smoke you

    Like the force of wind as it acted upon someone's hair.  The hair.  The cloak.  All brushed to one side by the strap-force wind.  (Brushed to the right side).  I was essential for their way of things.  And the shoes clicked on the dry pavement; heels in some form of fashion.  I was walking away from you.

    But you came back to me for some reason.  I wasn't just an person walking away, I was an person you had taken time to pursue now.  Just to say fuck you one more time before I finally have got my way.  There was anger in this aesthetic. Trying to make myself better  Of course there was angry in this aesthetic!  For what you had always done to me; that would never change.  It would always stay the same.

    When I start looking at it like that; like it was an aesthetic which was some superior sort of art form.  It was about the meaning of the words but also how I arranged them—which of them I highlighted.  It wasn't just about writing prose in an novelesque style but in finding in words the beauty that our language has become today.

    It was about taking something with apparent disorder and bringing it as an artistic subject into an type of order.  The transformation of the Artist himself across the page.  It started out beautiful, when I relaxed about reading the words.  And instead of waiting for an apparent effect, I just let them happen to me.  And instead of waiting for an apparent effect of reasoning, I just let my mind go wild.  It appeared to be an developing theme in the Naenaeon of Glen.

    Wildness was an attribute that someone could have.  Especially when they grew up camping in the British Columbian lakes territory.  I remember the grass, of all types.  And the Indian Paintbrush.  I guess some things in the English language are labeled badly.  I didn't need to follow the rules of some strict bureaucrat.  I was here for the health of the Earth, not necessarily solely those responsibilities for which we of human culture needed to provide for; all specimens of Life that exist on the Earthen plane.  We need not assume humans are superior to every single one of them.

    Yes, I played the Wildness card.  My tongue was wild as hell; it didn't need to be domesticated or groomed in any philosophical manner.  French was an wild language too.  The presence of the French across the southern Canadian prairies.  If my writing could transform (morph) into anything, what would it be?  The initial conflict with the repressed ego was about finding one's own identity within the title hashtag.  It held in anger an amount of power so revealing it was considered rude not to point it out: I had been hurt from all over and now I was angry about it.

    Really just the first step toward healing emotionally from it.

    The Aesthetic genre is really about the way your eyes happen upon the page.  Things you naturally recognize first, second, third, etc. in the order of how it was written.  Your eyes can jump from one paragraph or word to another.  There is reason in that; it isn't just happenstance you noticed one thing at an time.  Or in whatever order you noticed them; it was partly the Author's intention.  The Aesthetic is about an animated page, then, in its summit form.  Words and symbols that change and update themselves based on how you react to them.  For the first time in human history this is possible on an digital screen (an monitor or tablet), where words can change and update themselves in real time.  Art, Animation, and Prose meet one another in an virtual space which can change at any time.