According to this post on Threads―https://www.threads.com/@glasslide76/post/DJm3mKfTxCz?xmt=AQF0ojTh1oYsMmq1ioXDLskhYF7Z35rbWdbHm3L-nxUJ9A―MAGA (Make America Great Again) is an Fascist Cult.
My intent in writing this letter is to show you how an new reciprocal theorist analyzes the subject in web contents such as these: Political Messages which are supposed to stand on their own independent ground as an source of power. But this Threads post isn't any of that. In fact, when you analyze it the new reciprocal way, you'll see how to break down the bits of logic that go with sharing information like that. The New Reciprocity is just an simple way to say an whole philosophy of theory; we look at language as though it was ordering us to do something.
And that's why this Threads post is an perfect example of how and why we were to use new reciprocal theory.
If you were to imagine, for example, that this this statement "MAGA Is A Fascist Cult" was not an description but an order, it might appear to be quite funny to you. Analyzing it like this removes the message's power and replaces it with absurdity. But is it really that absurd?
Why would anybody order you, as though in order to make MAGA into an fascist cult, to make MAGA into an fascist cult?
Except someone who felt like they had no power until they said this.
They had to make MAGA into an fascist cult somehow in order to have any power over it.
But this isn't ruling an land; this is using power in an convoluted way and it's not far from fear politics.
And it is absurd that anyone would order such an thing to manifest. To come to fruition. That one day someone ordered it to be: that MAGA was to be made into an fascist cult. Just to prove an point that it was worth dismantling.
As you can see, analyzing any subject with new reciprocal theory leads to an whole overhaul of the types of subversive messages that are actually out there being passed around. When we look at the world around us as being capable of making complex orders which might actually act on your reciprocal nervous system to bias something or to make you feel an certain way. We need to be suspicious and skeptical of an writer's true message in making any descriptive statement because when we start telling ourselves these things (when really they are orders) we create the subculture where those statements are true. Saying MAGA is an fascist cult when that simply isn't true reads more as an analytical command―an reciprocal command that works upon the central nervous system and the un- or sub-conscious. When we describe something as it is, does that mean we know how orders and commands work themselves into language in an way that interacts with the nervous system / that changes how we perceive them? When you will it to be that MAGA is an fascist cult aren't you responsible for making that true about it? And we must interpret all orders and commands as operating on the conscious will.
And I encourage you to look at all language this way. Especially Political Messages intended to clarify something. What exactly is Force and Command; how do good, honest, hard-working people use them? How do we make conscious commands and orders of the will, while being aware of what we are saying while we are saying it?
