A Supreme Reflection.
It was named by so-and-so.
I'm doing specimen announcements head tilted up at the camera; camera tilted down at me like I am a specimen. Hello and welcome to the Union of Civilisations. No specimen was hurt in the recording of this installment. Good work everybody; we've installed the Union of Civilisations.
What does it mean philosophically to have a union of civilisations? All subjectivity is said to exist in civilisation, including alien subjectivity because we are vehicles of civilisation in the universe. We had a global civilisation that has developed many characteristics and now previously it was time to unite trans-universal civilisation as one important category of civilisation different than global civilisation, different than state-centered or metropolis-centered civilisations; different than all of the civilisations that now existed on Planet Earth because it existed everywhere in the universe. We may discover another Union at some point and realise them to be all part of the same union in the future; as yet we have not.
Hello? Yes, this is an announcement. We're now moving into universal civilisation. The Union of Civilisation will hold a meeting to discuss politics, philosophy, and religion. The first speaker is an aesthetic witness; someone who will speak out against a fellow aesthetic witnesses as a Police Officer with an opinion.
"Beauty does exist in the universe," she says, "and I am."
"Thank you, yes you are you aesthetic witness. Next, who will be presenting?"
And they went on like this, listening to different subjects that were brought up, in the presence of these people who were like judges, and they were old and kind, and held a sort of prominence in the theatre of discussion. Mostly, people wanted to talk about merging populations with extraterrestrials. Humanity knew of no such opportunity but was in thinking about another civilisation that had managed to merge finally, with extraterrestrials, successfully. The next most brought up subject, Politics and Philosophy, questioned which philosophies would extend their reach into the future possessing superior politics that would further advance the political agenda of biologically merging sentient life across the galaxy. When Religion was brought up there was a commotion; groups became entertainment circles of conversation and act. People represented their beliefs using a particular Aesthetic that sometimes involved a prop, like a Dreidel. Religious questions were asked, like what is a toy? How do you take it apart and put it back together? How did you come up with it in the first place? Who taught you this?
After they were entertained by dancing on the monitors above, a political fight broke out concerning aliens and the possibility humans are not good enough for them.
"We are good enough, and I can prove it right here!" shouted a voice.
"No you can't you don't even know what we're made of; and I'll have it right here you're a sexual new reciprocal theorist because I am."
A flute containing music from Canada started to play. Everyone recognized it as Aboriginal.
The Aesthetic selection was in mockery of the political rumble, in order to ramp up the political spectrum and tension of not one, but all competitors. Power beyond miraculous power was shown to possess no winner for no power was shown that could suture the event until, at the last a moment a Super Hero announced his Christiannan-ness. The Political fight became religious.
—the Christianna won—
Philosophy of Fairies is sensitive when a religious competition is ended.
What is a fairy to do when she has four wings? She uses two of them to teach the little ones and two of them to teach the big ones.
{An Ironist
fully featuring irony
gay, naked and brutal irony; she's complaining because nothing is wrong.
That's so systematic. Why's it orange? It's black inside. I have a slant. It is half black and half orange.
Just never stops complaining.}
Persuasion installed, I know that I cannot force you to think something but I must persuade you of what I think and so you can think what you want to think; unless you want to listen to some persuasion because I do. I want to hear persuasion about Love; for I have come to think Love is necessary but when we think to consider what is beyond love this becomes necessary, and so why do we need love? 'Beyond Love' doesn't need to mean out of the category of being able to be loved.
That's never what love is, is it?
But it isn't steady access, so what kind of virtue is that?
An improved one might be the virtue of Nyclepi, because it means laughter without irony in the serendipity, the stage after Love; but before Ace and Air Alt.
These are the virtues above Love that I have. Nyclepi, Ace, and Air Alt are a set. They mean better than Love, for love is old and dull and there must be something new in our Solar System.
Love Ends In Canada, newspapers will tell.
For Nyclepi means you don't need to clap also; needing to clap is what lead to Love, not other and better virtues. Clapping is for airplanes landing not Love. This is how we laugh without irony. For I think I have been in a Romance that was not Love, but it was not better than Love. I may find myself in better than love very soon. For I have virtues I created that are better than Love.
Without Love, what a world to be without Love, for Nyclepi, picks us up and puts us right; we never needed Love. We didn't ask for it. They just gave it to us. When we were born. But Nyclepi I had to work for. When I had accomplished it I knew not that it would become my main virtue. To embed love in a negative narrative for me seemed to work right. I was far purer than Love, perhaps, but I was determined to know why it called to me still. It told me I was special. That I had become what I had become because of it.
Love has served me; but I never asked to be served. I am not impressed that an emotion like love would leave me without a choice. Free Will is more important than love.
Avoid the fate worse than love.
Nyclepi doesn't clap for love.
Love is not very impressive.
Nyclepi is better than Love because love pressures people to serve one another like slaves.
Nyclepi, clearly unimpressed, trumps them hard. It doesn't clap for love because it doesn't need to. Embrace this virtue and I will tell you how it will perfect the human soul; though I understand Love may play a part that I do not presently understand. I am skeptical it can withstand my criticism.
For one thing it is not Love that delivered me here it is my hard work; and so I must take into account what credit I can give myself that was beyond love.
Love didn't save me.
But maybe that is because I have a new definition of love that did save me.
This Love, I call Anna. She would teach me how to tend to the fate worse than death in order to repair it. Anna became a symbol for anyone suffering the fate worse than death, and Christiannans, aware of these fates planned how to overcome them together. Wisdom of Old ill to provide any word on fates worse than death, we figured that was because they were fighting for their lives. There was no fate worse than death to them. In Recreation people started where such pleasure and luxury was dealing with fates worse than death. It was the result of Love. But so was the overcoming of the fate worse than death together. How was someone going to start suffering the fate worse than death and then at some point stop suffering the fate worse than death, in order to God to teach us how to overcome it?
I lived, said the Christiannan, I suffered the Fate Worse Than Death and I recovered. But we are all suffering the fate worse than death, said Global Politics, because our race is sensitive to History. We need figures like Anna to show us how we cannot, necessarily, move on. We will suffer as a species for a long time now because we created the fates worse than death. Like slavery, genocide, conversion therapy. But we are also saved from it because Anna is gay; this is not her fate worse than death to be gay, it is her dignity. Anna is the gay messiah.
Love is gay.
Being in love and loving someone are two distinct things though. I have never been in love but I've been in Nyclepi. It didn't feel like waiting for something. Like love makes me feel.
Nyclepi is gay too.
But it's not impatient like love is.
How far does love need to go in order to prove itself to us?
Nyclepi on the other hand just accepts us.
An Abstract term for an Abstract virtue. Nyclepi is better than Love. But I suspect it to require love to function correctly. Nyclepi humbles us; Love fills us with pride. They are not opposites but partners. For to have pride is to be humble; and yet not all who are humble have pride. Nyclepi, as I have said, is laughter. It is laughter that laughs at love. Without ironically. With serendipitously. It is perfect. When we feel nyclepi for each other we know we do not need to impress one another to love one another. When we feel love for each other we know that we do; and that hate is not how we impress each other. Some people have more nyclepi than others; but together we have enough for all of us. It is desirable to acquire nyclepi, for the more you have of it the more you laugh at love and its capers.
I have become the great ironist for how Love cannot appear in this world but I laugh at this the most because it already has. God's Love was before Nyclepi and I allowed myself to think of it as a work in progress, for we are subjects to God for the improvement of God as well.
The New Reciprocity with God has taken on a character that allows individuals to wonder whether they are each responsible for one another becoming what they want to be. And whether they are in the presence of God.
Reciprocal theory says we create each other by being citizens in a society that reciprocalizes us. How people treat you is the result of how you influenced them previously, your past accomplishments, and failures. When we ask for a new reciprocity from one another, it means we want a different type of relationship than the one we have currently. Of course society governs what types of relationships we have with one another. For example, how you would talk with an officer of philosophy or the law. It also doesn't. And those two qualities are why society is different. Being a reciprocal theorist means theorizing what types of relationships we govern together and what types of relationships do not need governance. Relationship with the self, for example. But it also means naming whatever we are so individually inclined to do in reciprocity of the fate that others are reciprocalizing us and we are reciprocalizing them. Our perceptions of one another can be read as actually reciprocal commands. "You are this. I am this. We are this." It becomes political because what we say we are is also what we command one another to be. A reciprocal conversation may be to find understanding of that intersectionality in a mood in one another and to understand why.
I swore an oath to protect you because I am a knight, reads as a demand that you will take measures to make sure that I remain a knight. Politically, I am a knight is a reciprocal command.
At the Garden Altar party, some gnomes who had been in a meeting had just arrived. There were male and female gnomes; there were LGBTπ gnomes. And there were fairies. The Garden Altar was at the centre of the garden beautifully set with a round white crystal around which grew flashes of pink and red flowers of the hedge. A sage gazing into the crystal being seen experimenting with Proffidlius, the Brave, whose mind was shared with the sage; was heard saying the fairies were pretty and the gnomes were quiet, but he could get them to talk.
At the Fairy Altar a scene was taking place across the air above the round crystal. The sage was mentioning it to Proffidlius, proffiddliously.
"What the whose-the-what?"
"Lol. Yea they are causing us to think in New Reciprocal terms. It's quite fascinating."
He was inspecting the crystal when the Fairy Sage addressed the issue of not having anyone interesting to talk to except Proffiddlius himself.
"Proffiddlius, when you talk to others," asked the Sage, "do you think of them as interesting?"
"Yes. This one approaches us is interesting."
"A new reciprocal theorist perhaps."
"When we share new reciprocal theories of each other; what do they say? A Superhero?"
"You're a pineapple. And I'm a cantaloupe. That's what they say."
"What happens in this scene?"
"They are beside each other. Fruity. Delicious."
"I see. Are they thinking?"
"Yes."
"What are they thinking?"
"The pineapple is thinking I'm a Superhero. And the cantaloupe is I-am-a-super-hero."
"I see. Do care for what pineapples say. Or cantaloupes?"
"Excuse me?"
"Do you pineapples or cantaloupes?"
New reciprocal theorists ask these important questions; ever more sophisticated in reflection for when we say we are pineapples or cantaloupes this is an example of imaginative reciprocity. New reciprocities do not need to be imaginative. We can say, "My profession is writing. I am a writer," and read it as a reciprocal command. If saying I am a pineapple was a demand, or a command, we would ask how to fulfil that command. How are you a pineapple? It is involving biotechnic manipulation and a lot of hard work to be a pineapple.
"I am not a pineapple," is a better command presently because we do not know how to turn a human into a pineapple. Yet. We can aestheticize someone to be like a pineapple linguistically. You just need to be silent. Pineapples don't talk. Put your hair up spikey. Be delicious.
New Reciprocal Theory investigates hidden or explicit commands in language that condition us to be or to be not what we say we are. This itself can be read as a command that the analysis of language as reciprocal command theory is essential for a healthy political life and environment because we often say or do things that organize one another socially not just by describing what is happening; but with reciprocity of the fact of who and what we are to one another. When you give people a new reciprocity you give them free choice to command who and what they are to you and to reciprocalize yourself a favour of that freedom being given back to you.
Demands are subtle sometimes, but categorically accessible under the New Reciprocity.
I am _________ is a demand, we already know.
I think that if we use reciprocity as a political agenda—the New Reciprocity—is that we come to be more comfortable with ourselves and each other. As psychologically reciprocal and each as subjects with our own way of sharing our own individual psychology and experiences of demands as reciprocal subjects, "I am a Capitalist" reads as a demand to be capitalist amidst adversity. Hearing language this way promises to be interesting and show us how we use language to shape our identities with one another. It is all based on a language theory that what we say we are is what we ask ourselves to be. "To be or not to be? That is the question," Shakespeare wrote.
Pushing New Reciprocity further
community theory
- Communication is essential.
character theory
- Somebody or nobody else can do your own mimicry of yourself as a subject.
personality theory
- Everyone of yourself as a subject can do their own version of you. This is in contrast to character theory because to have character means to be you when somebody, or possibly, nobody else will. And to have personality means to be you vis-à-vis everyone else will too.
capital theory
- What is right now available to do will soon become unavailable; act when you can. Do you have a subject?
political theory
- New Reciprocity is always available between parties.
philosophy theory
- Philosophy is like cool, duh.
language theory
- Language of philosophy of religion is on full time; gay religion philosophy of religion is gay full on all the time.
religion theory
- Naenaeon
; theory theory (a theory of theory)
- A theory does or does not start; when it begins it means it begins that theories live in the psyche as independent of one another maybe most of the time or not most of the time.
It is at the end of a theory being formed that it joins the others in the mind. The formation of theories continues as competing theories try to outmatch each other. What would it mean for a theory to outmatch another? A theory can outmatch another when it destroys the other theories that are then cleared from the psyche as no longer theories. Smart theories will try to outmatch others from time to time. Theory brainstorm time is when I start theorizing how others theorize about my theory in order to understand how that would help me theorize. If a theory leads to another theory it is a good theory. My theory is everything is fine. Fine like a sharpened pencil. Then, a new theory, that everything is not. When following through that everything is not fine I again theorize that everything is fine. And it seems to hold true for if I make a good theory about everything being fine following from a theory that everything is not fine then the creation of that new theory despite being from the smouldering wreckage of how things are not fine is itself quite fine. Theories help us generalize this way.
I have learned; that I can have character like no one else will. And I can have personality like everyone else will.
No comments:
Post a Comment