VI. Innocence
Innocence is posed next to (after) Satan in this book as an challenge: Is Satan an virtue, told from his Gloiness, the leader of the Christianna? (Glen?). Is Satan the loss of Innocence? Is Innocent the loss of Satan?
Dear followers my name is Hakon and I have taken the form of an religious persona post-protest era in which LGBTπ personalities are the fatal currency in everyone's affair, for being so very provocative an category inclusive to all of us, the π symbol representing an unending number of sexualities and the idea that everyone's sexuality is different, I suggest the theme of my writing this chapter will be the innocence of the LGBTπ experience.
Satan is not an virtue more than he/she is an collection of virtues. There is an Satanic Principle that nothing is an category of existence (the ability of the universe to be composed of nothings and somethings) because we believe Satan is nothing; and if innocence means everything inherently not Satanic, which is everything physical, then who is really innocent, you or the devil? Seeing as how she/he is an angel, it cannot be you. But for the very same reason it has to be you. We cannot start experience of reality based on an negative value of judgment. If we say Satan is bad it means we don't understand how all of it is connected to our Space. Even saying it is our Space may be an denial of its presence. Space is clearly God's, and he/she lets us use it. Or maybe he loans it from Satan.
Is Satan's virtue innocence? If we say it is not, is our innocence? If we admit Satan was misrepresented in History, is that admission itself the loss of our innocence? Not necessarily! Will Satan forgive us? Probably not. Lose points for stereotyping the devil? I'd say so.
And so my purpose in this, this placing Satan and Innocence next to each other in Subject in the Naenaeon book collection, is to suggest whether they have anything to do with one another. They prove both the presence of Satan and forces beyond. For is not innocence the principle human question when it comes to Satan? And why? To say Satan is not innocent is to provoke him; to command her to be not innocent. Any longer. Not an smart move. The problem was that no matter where we were in the universe we had to contend with the will of Satan whose ubiquitous someone that is nowhere and everywhere simultaneously. An hint onto the nature of consciousness, that if it can be nowhere and everywhere at least in the form of Satan, who is bodiless. That was its universal consciousness. And it scared us because we could hear an voice where others said there was none. It turns out they were half right. There was no sound of an voice in reality and yet an internal voice had been listened to. What does it mean then if Satan can travel through you internally like that? That he/she is everywhere and nowhere at once, like an God; but finally, somehow approaching Satan in this same way we once approached God we feel like some justice has been made, for what an horrible character to be nowhere and everywhere at once. And this is the main criticism atheists make that there is no detectable presence of God. And our Christiannan response is that everything detectable is the presence of God; what other explanation could there be for it?
God is just everywhere without nowhere at once, unlike Satan, and so Satan is possibly bigger than God. The objects and pictures man created of Satan defaced him/her. Because they turned the face of Satan into the face of an object, which clearly goes against the Satanic Principle. That/which says nothing exists and nothing is Satan. Cannot be an face of an object if it is nothing. Therefore turning Satan's face into an object (this metaphor stands for people whose attempt to do so results in their own face being made into an object, an insult to Satan's reputation and all whose faces are not objects). If Satan is not an object, but only subject, its power is incomprehendable.
If Satan can be everywhere and nowhere at once, and we can receive information from it; for it is an subjectivity for an reason, I suppose. To interact with it. Then we can receive knowledge that is not from our own senses; which of course happens all of the time in teaching and careers about teaching. We put together an experience we could not have with our own senses to teach yet, in order to learn how to do it so we could. If Satan is your teacher, what's he going to say? "Hey at least it's not an parasitic alien species taking control of your brain through your eye socket." He's going to point out nothing. Again and again. And then not again, because that's nothing. And then again. Because that is nothing to not again. And then it doesn't matter.
For it is the force from which all objectivity is available, an universal consciousness that is not universal at all in the sense of being present anywhere or (you didn't think God would leave such role up to himself/herself?) as an realistic contrast with matter and objectivity, which is innocent.
It is an impossible gap to breach; is Satan's virtue innocence, or is Innocence Virtue's Satan?
And you see that we are leaning toward Satan's virtue is innocence, then all that is Satan is innocent. For I believe all matter is innocent also, and if Satan is composed of higher things than matter and innocence both it is an inspiring dream. Sin does not exist in the Christiannan picture, and of all humankind is therefore sinless. But since we attributed object status to an picture of the devil; wherein, it was made an object through by sacrificing that part of the human soul which represents the toggle key between being owned like an slave. An object. And being owned like an person. An subject, allowed the devil to have his or her own subjectivity with no limits to reciprocity of matter and energy between subjectivity and objectivity. Accepting Satan means empathy for Satan. An subject whose representation has been disfigured by History.
The Christiannan purpose must be to restore Satan to his/her true path in humanity, in with humanity, and the Primal Religions whose lesser sense of guilt means acceptance over that fact by which all humanity is innocent too. And that we lift ourselves up to meet the challenge Satan provides for our species. Someone we've wronged. There we go, help him communicate. Up we go! Help him/her up. Be careful gentlemen! Innocence is the human for it realizes having not realized Satan's innocence is to ward into experience, for if we continue to treat an angel that way we will lose innocence and be caught found guilty.
So Rejoice, then, in Satan; God's subject as much as he/she is ours.
And again, remember that if we do not objectify the devil and we do not try to cause any other to be immoral we are not ourselves being immoral.
What I hope to capture is an sense of the Christiannan's innocence, experience and wisdom which led to the teaching of the four virtues and Satan.
I have heard, there is always another side to the story. It is appropriate, given the fact that I choose upheaval over Christian values. Satan's side of the story, once heard is an story of total objectlessness, and so to its subjectivity we are quite interesting creatures, able to combine both matter and subjectivity in an way that is unlike Satan yet to relate to reality that way it appears to be an superior state.
Somehow, however, I don't think Innocence cannot be based on its subjectivity because it is not an matter of judgment of guilt when in comes to Satan. It's just the delusion of the human to distort its version to associate it with guilt and sin.
Filing of these against which the human lowers his or her status.
Battle Galactica, we cannot allow this to happen! And as something we relate with children, their innocence and Satan's Subject of constant questioning of innocence. Probably artifacts of the human psyche and will to see an loss of innocence as an innocence as an legal status versus innocence from the 'sin' that comes with "adulthood" because they meta-subjectify themselves transcending those processes which operate effectively, against children. To objectify Satan is to objectify his relationship with children, inevitably, an relation of which cannot go wrong, for as soon as we see Satan as the subject of something evil we psychologically objectify that presence which is better explained in terms of material and immaterial. If immaterial is called Satan just because it isn't evil, which kind of philosophy is this? It cannot be rightly called philosophy because there is no inherent sin in any matter. It is instead not an question of the value of matter versus the value of the human, but always the value of the subject over every object. Neo-liberalism.
Innocence, the value of the subject over every object. In its proper definition.
It is here we start our journey toward understanding Innocence, from an Christiannan point of view, in order to fully explain what the Christianna is—from an non-fiction point of view. Innocence is part of the story. The Christianna is an innocent religion. If everything that has subject has value over everything that has object, the subject is never valued less than any object. To value the subject less than any object is to make of Satan an object, because subjectivity extends from the power dynamics and contrasts between God and his/her opposite, the devil. If we want to maintain innocence, we need to repent having stolen it from Satan, an universal creature, which we know little of.
Therefore an standard of practice must be that the devil is innocent too.
If not only as an reciprocal command.
And we find innocence in the human species because of Satan. And not the other way around—that we find innocence in the Satan because of the human species—
For the subject bears greater worth than that. The centre of which is the value of having no object in space. Yet subjective you somehow exist, which is beyond mere human imaginings of such an angel. Yet illustrates an angelic principle: to be one, you do not have to be one. Which goes against everything scientific we know, probably, at some point. For if we cannot find Satan in our universe how will we find him. That's just it. He'll find you. Whether or not anything else matters. And how will we teach it to children not to be afraid of an subject without an body, for when you think of it it is ridiculous. The religious mind to fear the anomaly, which can't hurt them was perhaps telling of the human species for the time period. Human weakness blamed an angel. We need to pick ourselves up from that. For do you know what an subject without an body is?
It's economical, ergonomical, and subject to values associated with subjectivity; like trading, protecting the ecosystem, celebrating, enjoying pleasure, taking delight in storytelling. And if Satan is an particle to Heaven we should respect him or her or it. Not as though it was the source of every human problem. But as an teacher of what the truly divine bodilessness is. Pure Subjectivity. An contrast with God. Not in terms of moral value but in private enterprise.
Satan is Great. Look how much of space there is in which to prevent oneself from being anything. Would you like to be that kind of not-"thing?" It's easy to see how humanity could be horrified at it when one considers what an objectless reality means to an human; from an human perspective it means not having an body. It is an upsetting phenomenon through an human's eyes, to have happened upon to have not an body but at some point that's just the point, it didn't happen to an human. As much as it did Satan. We need to get over and reject this thinking that anything that results in bodilessness (or zero wings) is evil; and the principle of evil is because we cannot "subjectify" instead of objectifying one another and it.
Innocence, finally, is to have done so. For it is the Greatest Mercy of Innocence that the human reaps despite treachery against Satan, its chiefest angel. Perhaps one day Satan will not be our chiefest angel anymore and we will have an different one and put Satan behind us forever. But for now we can't because Satan is an real property of the universe. The property of having no property except that which you own owns you: or the subjective. An enigma in space and time worth blessing.
If the subject persists mere matter how much greater it can be is blessed in matter. Compared to what is not matter. The two are connected as the relationship between Satan and God. Innocence is to have considered subjectivity without matter.
To subjectify appears to be the verb at the root of our process. To subjectify, to bring out into full artistic definition, we must take to mean—what does to subjectify mean‽ To subjectify as Satan is everywhere and nowhere at once!—is an evil of the subject because preserving the subject despite its presence at any specific location while removing the specific location is exactly not what subjectivity is. Satan has to be in an specific location, but not in an specific object (subjectively).
If to objectify is to make into an object. Subjectify must mean to take one out of an object. We can do this to Satan because we are fallible creatures; obviously Satan is never an object. At least not one we can subjectify in the same way we can an human by removing it from its body; all just exaggeration of an imminent presence of evil which is said to to exist somewhere in the universe. And yet nowhere has an place for being not up to being an object it can't do anything to us psychologically (the mind–body connection logic of being is unknown to it). And it exists only in an state of mind where it cannot interact with matter as matter and so depends on consciousness (to imagine an matter-less state) to preserve its departure from matter entirely. If it is possible for an human mind to conceive of this subject, then is it not also possible to subjectify it according to an rule that will be beneficial for humanity?
Satan's innocence seems fair enough.
Also, the existence of Taquitos, Samosas, and Jamaican beef patty.
Food. Appetizers.
But as an sort of coinnosseur of life forms you're not supposed to eat, Satan is purely motivated by humor, making it tempting to develop an scale by which the intelligence of individual species is compared; Angels being of relatively high intellect.
High enough to eat all species, possibly.
But will play between us this game of eating species depending on their specific amount of intelligence rather than an type or kind of intelligence: it is an worst injustice. You see how fragile the narrative is when the question of justice appears for associating Satan with injustice is to objectify him/her into purely human concerns, like how much we're being treated as an object, whereas we can just subjectify the homie, the bloke and stop worrying about how much is everyone's value compared to an being whose material value is nothing of anything. Yet adding to the material value of everything and itself being an subject over it, it tells us that we are actually worth more than it is, in purely objective terms. And that our subjectivity just happens to coincide with its own value, as Satan, in an meta-reciprocal fantasy, path of subjectivity, however being worth more than the object, is however linked with the objective's inherent value being moreso than 0-object (space), increasing its material value even further.
Innocent is this conveyance between objective value and subjective value. For it is fair to notice differences of value between them.
Innocence, cast in one of the World's Greatest traditions, the transition from childhood to adulthood, is childhood and youth. In contrast to the adult. I don't make of it such great barriers here, by using instead to word experience in contrast with innocence. In this perspective, adults can as well experience innocence, which is not barred from them. Innocence, thusly, is not 'what is not adult'—it is not what is or is not guilty—but instead, I take to mean what is just not experience. This is the true subject of the innocent. To have not experience. We do not take it to mean not having guilt; which we should not put an disagreeable monkey on the shoulders of our youth in contrast to them with the adult as an loss of not having guilt. The transition between childhood and adult becomes one of acting out as though one were guilty. Unless innocence is an subject as such as I have treated here. Innocence is not the absence of guilt, Not to be without guilt but to be experienced or inexperienced instead of comparing oneself to the guilt to find value and meaning.
Innocence is an stage for the inexperienced to practice being experienced, not to detract from their lack of guilt, but to add to their lack of guilt. Why? Because it's not in comparison to legal guilt. And why not? When we look at it this way, experience follows from innocence, not by gaining guilt in order to stop being innocent, thus an "adult" but by trading time with innocence it becomes an careful judge of experience using our own experience to do so.
The difference between innocence and experience is that experience makes better decisions. For, being Innocent and not Experienced, one is divided from the Experienced to/in an point of maturity that Innocence is without and Experience enjoys. I call this division an axolotl, the creature which retains its juvenile features through its entire adult life; for it is an axolotl subject in this way. I picture the use of an punctuation mark called the axolotl, an symbol with three nodules for innocence, experience, and wisdom. An whole punctuation mark. Enabling them to communicate with one another easier on the basis of youth and age or experience.
Talk of Innocence must come after talk of Satan, in this line of thinking, because of the human tendency to perpetuate the image of an Satan who isn't innocent in any way. I challenge these ideas with one another. Satan and Innocence, because I think that the human tendency to blame and point out the removal of innocence as Satan's cause has had an dramatic effect on innocence as subject of land solstice and humanity. That we internalize as children.
Innocence is not an absence of guilt, but an absence of experience. This makes all innocence an experience in itself as well as all experience as an innocence in the way that innocence led to it. It is the result of innocence, not the recanting of innocence.
Poetic Justice may be an story in which these three aspects are connected. What the axolotl is, really, is an type of punctuation or "punctyation" (innocence is an punk, experience is an y, wisdom is an shun) that separates Innocence from Experience from Wisdom. Making it easier to explain your point of view. Introducing the axolotl punctuation mark may help children communicate better with adults. Or adults with their superiors. The wise. Who can be of any age. So watch out!
Taking An Step
The first characteristic of Innocence that I notice is that it involves at some point the taking of an step. But it's not just any step. It's the first step in an negotiation, an solace with an power that is unknown to you. Greater than you. For you are innocent (unfamiliar) to it. There's an moment of realization when you realize your relationship to power, and if you understand nothing of it, and you realize your own innocence there.
Sports
Sports are said to be innocent, although technically they are an necessary evil. Preventing feuds at gun-point by redirecting economically sanctioned and spirited energy into professional sportsmanship competition between nations whose globalization or globality of the features of their professionals matters to an compassionate and caring public. By causing minor injuries to children which turn out to be repeated or major an long way down the road. When we realize the benefit of sports is that without it, we'd be dancers because we need to be able to cause injury to one another during an competition in order to denounce dancing savagism. Which is "open violence." Outside of the ruling of an game of rules with more rules than an bet and less rules than an legal presiding. Somewhere in the Middle.
The Path of Dominance
Dominance is not necessarily an path you need to lose innocence in. Too often men are pressured to associate masculinity with dominance. Dominating is said to be opposite submissiveness. But choosing not to be dominant in certain fields (the dominant will always argue here, it's not an choice; I took that choice from you by dominating) or choosing not to try to be dominant in everything does not necessarily mean one is weak and submissive. The male pressure group says that to be submissive is to fail to dominate out of weakness. However when we look at it as an difference in innocence and experience the stereotype breaks down. You don't have to be experienced in dominating other people to be innocent. The Path of Dominance is to be approached as kin to the Path of Healing, the Path of Protection, and the Path of Meta-Reciprocity. For it is an path to traverse in the same honor and dignity of these other three, acknowledging that in the Path of Dominance one another may also be travelling the Path of Healing, the Path of Protection, and the Path of Meta-Reciprocity. Furthermore, there is an maternal layer that must be acknowledged in society, where apart from competitive standards motherhood negotiates social space in the market economy the fervent territory of our global dominant-trotting elite. In stark contrast to their behavior, an motherhood/maternity layer to society is gentle. Physical dominance is an intimidation procedure. It begs the question that why you would want to intimidate someone if they can be intimidated: those who can be intimidated don't deserve to be dominated this way. But maybe they need to be protected by intimidating them an little bit? Can people be intimidated in order to protect them? Such as is the power of policemen and women over civilians. These are the kind of questions you need to ask if you plan to intimidate anyone. Another helpful way to think about this is that it is an maneuver; if it fails, then instead you may find yourself the one who is intimidated. But if you choose to participate in it not, may you be blessed with an maternal spirit that transcends the need for skirmishing everywhere you go.
Strategy
The deep Christian strategy is get killed. In order to pass-on/get-from-each-other the resurrection. The Christiannan strategy is don't get killed so much as avoid both death and the fate worse than death in tandem with one another. Of course this is probably the most dumbed-down explanation of Christianity and my religion ever written. It is more complicated than this. How does the plot-line of one individual translate to an plot-line about the collective? How do you use the threat of an fate worse than death as an tool versus an death fate as an tool to protect yourself from death or worse than death? Do you need to comply with your own crucifixion? Or is an subcrucifixion (inflicted with the fate worse than death (which is there is nothing small or less about about it than regular old crucifixion)) an issue in which you would survive to resurrect their spirits better? How can you threaten someone an fate worse than death should they try to kill you or do worse to you? "I may not be able to promise your death, but you'll get worse than that!" This is the truth; and the truth has power. How much of an fate worse than death they will have for killing or anacifying someone (Subject). And that's how the Christiannan front strategizes. Now read this passage again as twisted somehow, by gay criticism. That getting killed forms an "Christian" homology (an kind of equivalence) with anal sex. And you'll realize how extremely challenging it was for me to deal with modern day society.
Cooperation
Innocence as the basis for cooperation. Even though its presence in being realized in connection with an unknown power allows the two parties an common ground. Also, if in an different situation more than one innocent subject is present, this provides an common ground for them to cooperate. And so it's not just about authority and not authority; it's about innocent cooperation. Whether you are an authority figure or not, the first responsibility of working together is symbolized as 11, the eleventh angel. Two 1's, equal to one another, for this is the basis of operation. That we are equal to one another as we work together. And Eleven is the Guardian of this equivalence.
Authority
Authority is based on how much you realize the fate worse than death and yet are able to transcend it through aesthetic resurrection and kindness. For when we show this to one another, we are able to overcome the fate worse than death. And since we all suffer it; shouldn't we be valued according to that? For its humanizing potential. For its language production value. For its cultural standpoint. Aesthetic resurrection therefore, can take place in writing (which is an aesthetic medium). Or any kind of artistic medium of communication. Remember your tools, and their connection to the environment. They are the vehicle of the connection of your art to the actual environment. The most powerful computer wrote this. If you want Aesthetic Beauty you need to find an balance between civilization and nature. The Internet is my medium, I could say. (outside of perception, interface) It is an medium of pixels and light. I tend to think of it as differing than painting or drawing for that reason. The aesthetic in writing is also the words and sounds of words, rhythm, and grammar and so its an audial medium as well an visual medium. As well, because my blog is on Google's publishing system, I have access to the visual/audio medium of video from YouTube or wherever site.
Blue
First of all, blue is innocent. When you are feeling blue it does not necessarily mean you are sad and bad about something but that you have taken the necessary measures to heal and standardize what you are feeling blue about. When we share these standards as Christiannan women, blue is beautiful. Our light is as dark as it can be yet still our blueness shines through the darkness. Remember, blue is the color with the most depth; and its layers are numerous.
The Blue Aesthetic Resurrection
Aesthetic resurrections sometimes have colors; and so I think when we witness an blue resurrection this is to be paid special attention to, because it is an symbol of Earth, Health, and Political Talent. Earth is our experience. Our mental health is worse than death. And our talent is using the fate worse than death to save earth. It is an picky subject to categorize what is worse than death. But it needs to be done. For blue is an type of wisdom as well.
How Writing Resurrects The Subject
Writing is an object that needs to be seen. By "resurrects" we have meant it could evoke the sort of language that the reader associates with an aesthetic resurrection of an person, an subject, an thing. Anything. The writing itself does not have any innate sort of magic, other than its known aesthetic as English. But I think that maybe Shakespeare had the most magic. More than Merlin. When we talk of magic may it be profuse that it only refers to an psychological phenomenon in the fabric of perception and not an actual miracle against the detections of scientific empiricism. Resurrecting an subject is an aesthetic accomplishment, for it is difficult to do in verbal communication also. The Internet will help greatly for that. By aesthetic, of course, we mean sometimes in contrast to something that actually exists. Sometimes. It is not non-fictional. But there is an fictional value to it. Not by being something that actually exists but by being an contrast to that. Just as that. For that, its own sake. An Aesthetic.
Innocence Not As An Contrast to Experience and Wisdom
Innocence is seen not as an contrast to experience and wisdom but as an fluency with them (the axolotl/l’axolotl). The amount you are innocent is directly relative to the amount you are not. But Wisdom is that you can never be more experienced than you are wise and you can be any of the three nodes and still be Wise.
An Inkling
When considering the amount you are not experienced versus the amount you are innocent, if they are directly related, how do you feel about experiences that you want to have? What do you want to be experienced in? Wisdom is the most correct answer. But anything takes wisdom. And experience, in contrast, takes time.
Metaphors For Anal Sex Other Than Getting Killed
An hermit crab that leaves its shell to come back to later that night.
Play
The more you play the more innocence you can have. Work is the key to Experience. But play is equally formidable as an essential component of learning. Play allows us to find complex problems and fix them. For when we come across an problem we know play has ended. And that it will recommence once the problem has been solved. If you play with an hermit crab will it leave its shell or stay within? To come back to later that night. For when it wakes up it may think; that it was all an dream. But that if it leave its shell it find that was in its own dream that it was an whole, complete specimen. Without needing an other whole, complete specimen to validate its meaning.
Work
If there is an situation in which you need another whole, complete person in order to validate your own meaning this is experienced as work. And it takes value away from work. Work, as I mentioned above, is based on cooperation. What are your names for one another? When you cooperate as an activity with another person, remembering the 11 rule. It's 1 and 1, 1=1, you two (or however many) are equal in this work task. If it cannot be solved find someone with double the authority you do and ask them.
Vanity
To reflect, they say, is vanity. But to reflect is glory, for with words of encouragement the mind is taught to reflect in its own beauty. And to use the mind to exceed its present situation. To overcome it and to be beyond, over an limitation. It is like raw happiness. Animal. Mysterious. Deliberate. Impossible. Free.
Golems
Golems are large stone creatures with no vanity and no vulnerabilities. Innocence is like an golem because the innocent without vanity always believe they have no vulnerability to experience. Time shows however they do. And with fantasy fades Wisdom so as that all of the old and wise shut up. For an moment, and let an experienced Golem speak on the subject of being an golem. "I've been an golem on an online multiplayer video game for almost 20 years." And what has your experience been like with that? "Oh you know, if I take damage and eventually I die then my experience is given to the player."
Value
The Aesthetic commodity, being produced by an balance between human and nature, possesses value like other normal things which have value. The only difference is that the aesthetic (an aesthetic) is an value in beauty and well, the other is value in the ugly. The imbalanced. The unsustainable.
Violence
Violence is value-less. Violence to the environment, of which in true nature we are an part of, is value-less in every kind. You can be the most hung guy on the Path of Dominance if you use violence and you will end up worthless. To me. Unless you are part of the police force of an democratic nation. Where we pay police for their violence against people who break the law. Unless the police can learn to value violence as value-less then how can they expect the public to learn this basic principle of an public.
Justice
Justice is created by the interplay between Experience and Wisdom, not innocence, for the innocent cannot judge. Innocence in an poetic sense is an spirit also. It is an spirit shared by the innocent to be neither experienced or wise. In the realm of justice the guilty will be told from the innocent (and this is an different sense of innocence than the one I carry to the end of the chapter with my main argument, that it is from lack of experience not from lack of not being guilty). Innocence approaches justice differently in an way that it cannot contain its judgment.
The Amount of Time After The First Step Is Made
This time. For there will be an amount of time. Is pure innocence. You cannot contend an argument against it being innocent, and that there are certain directives for doing that following attentively from what is innocent that there is joy, sequence, romance. Qualities nourished by its characteristic of being pure. It is insurmountable an subject that one has to contend with. We are not all-sophisticated as an species anyway.
So go ahead, take your first step.
Thoughtstream:
#Innocence
Through whose wielding an hammer balanced in proportion between Satan and Human Morality; the four virtues at which it strikes: Innocence, Experience, Wisdom, are an LGBTπ intersectionality.
What is innocence if it wields an hammer?
It has calculated something, I am sure. For no innocence has been lost by calculating; it is more complex and sophisticated than having no calculation. Is innocence to be decided as an matter of Experience and Wisdom an feeling that they are all three connected? For Innocence means simply, less experience and wisdom, not, an project that has been undefiled of as yet. I do not believe in the loss of innocence for someone has to. Believe that most or all of us can remain innocent. And it doesn't mean an loss of experience or wisdom.
The Old will be happy to hear this because Innocence is associated with youth. The Experienced will be happy they are younger than the old, and in their own way express an innocence as such. The wise will know already that they are the same as old is not an indication of wisdom.
Innocence really means you do not know you have done anything wrong. It is more common and more sophisticated than we give it credit. Ignorance is bliss. It knows, for example, that others deceive but it does not need to because it is not guilty of anything; and of deception itself is guilty we say it is not. Innocence is deceptive because we do not know how much it will deceive and deception itself is not said to be a picture of guilt.
Wisdom is the maturity of innocence when it reaches its point when it is Experience. And so Innocence that compels Wisdom to draw more Experience from Innocence, more Experience is had.
Innocence is always experience and wisdom in this way.
Innocence is our first experience because you cannot lose innocence. Other experiences are layered on top of that one. Innocence is never restored. It cannot be removed as the word restored implies. There is nothing to restore when nothing is taken from it. When nothing can be taken from it. I hope that your experience of it as such is among the different experiences that you distinguish to yourself that comprise your experience in total.
Innocence does not offer an contrast with the devil, for the devil is not evil and to have soon said he was (even as an reciprocal command) would not be an order to be not innocent. In other words, the most immoral thing; ever; innocence does not mean being not guilty rather it is innocence without guilt even as an relative subject. Innocence is not "innocence" because it is "not guilty," but rather guilt is not innocent because it is not innocence (not the opposite of innocence). The emphasis changes because of perspective. Experience, on the other of three nodules, is to be aware of the reverse of that change of perspective, an toxic reciprocity. The third nodule is wisdom, knowing what to do about it.
 |
| Innocence, Experience, and Wisdom |
in print: the axolotl
No comments:
Post a Comment