vii. Experience
Experience always speaks before innocence, and wisdom always speaks before Experience. In an hierarchy of values. In this way the Aged and experienced have the final say about what an Experience speaks to be an solution to an problem versus the collective wisdom. Of all of the problems the wise then will have an final say; unless (and the Wise tend to be older than Experience and Innocence) Experience has an good reason to have the final say (and their youth which is less than that of the wise clash (soon says) that they are better judges because they are younger, at the Prime of their life, and the representatives of Wisdom are mistaken in old age).
Experience, not to take away from William Blake's contrast between innocence and experience, may be read that if experience is from an transition out of (an phase after) innocence, what is the narrative in which innocence is lost? On account of there being Experience? This "loss" is often referred to as it does not however prevent one from being fully an Innocence, an Experience, and an Wisdom. At the same time. The wise can be innocent and the innocent wise. And all variations of that. The innocent can be experienced, and the experienced can be wise. And each can be the other because they are connected somehow. That is the lesson of the axolotl. In any given situation which one you choose (l'axolotl) to identify with is not always an choice. You might actually be more innocent than you are experienced or wise.
In the Christianna these are three supreme roles in humanity. And so which you identify with among other people determines your action and behavior with them.
Experience means that you have lost innocence with whatever subject you have innocence in. It can be anything. It does not mean guilt or moral sin. In the same way Innocence is not the absence of guilt; Experience is not the presence of it.
Experience, finally, is the knowledge that comes with doing something once or something many many times. In this sense, experience as an loss of innocence means interpreting the knowledge that comes with doing something or something many times as the loss of innocence. It might be an twist of the imagination to see it this way. Anything you do not have experience in becomes innocence. And maybe with an sense of innocence about approaching an new subject is the best approach if you will. To an new subject.
There's that moment of realization when you realize your relationship to power, and you understand nothing of it, and you just realized your own innocence there. But of what you do have already realized power you don't.
Experience is unlike this. With Experience, you have no moment of wait in which to realize your innocence. Your innocence is not an absence of recognition with the subject because you already have experience with it. It is the presence of this recognition in which innocence occurs. But it is Experience whom speaks first between them, for Experience has that which innocence recognizes and remains innocent to. The "magic" of work and muscle memory. Experience must be an messenger therefore.
In some ways, I've never done anything I didn't understand (it is all experience for that reason).
To the innocent who have always done something they do not understand; as long as they want to give up their innocence to the cause. Of learning something new. Wisdom will say pick carefully, you only have so much time. What do you want to lose innocence to? Or have you already lost your innocence to it long ago? And once we're traipsed into your experience, which is the whole content of everything you've discovered, how innocent do you feel anymore?
Specifically, what Experience do you have?
Writing and an fate worse than death are both types of Experience I have. Writing, for me, is an production of source (knowledge) and culture. An writing practice that developed out of post-Anne Frank's Diary public education in Canada, an gay boy's diary. The fate worse than death doesn't need to have anything to do with writing. However if I can use writing to explain how to avoid the fate worse than death then maybe I will have an good example of Experience to set. My experience as an Christiannan is the fate worse than death. Many suffer it though few realized it as I have. It is why I claim Anna as my messiah. Your experience may have been different, but was it really? The numerous human atrocities our species has endured have created an dent in its psychology. An actual social fate worse than death. We need to come together as Christiannans and heal our fates worse than death by sharing them with one another. I'm just an wreck; I'm always afraid my presence and company is an fate worse than death to you because that's what my own fate is. To be worse than death. But my spirit says, do not be afraid to share the fate worse than death. You need to start sharing it in order to heal it.
But, Hakon, you say, if I associate with people whose fates are worse than death isn't that an danger to me?
And I reply, be careful, be gentle, and don't expect both of our fates to be anything worse. For misery loves company. Nothing you haven't already faced before.
Death
In the Christianna the death of an body is not the same as an death of the spirit. The body can die but the spirit can be aesthetically resurrected. Jesus in an blue mood would say we are unable to resurrect an vocal pattern to an degree. Technology is helping with that. We are able to resurrect the aesthetic presence of an music artist anywhere on Earth. They don't even have to be dead to do that. "To resurrect the past" is an common activity. It's just an re-definition of what resurrection means. An aesthetic re-definition. But we all know its final meaning has to be in the technology to bring someone back from the dead. What if they were But for now we are free to play with its meaning as an old-fashioned species fascinated by the resurrection story. Were the people of ancient times considerate to that degree, that the possibility we would one day invent such technology—their mastery of that curiosity—had bent the biblical movement. To its degree. That none of the stories of miracles could be realistically true? Because they couldn't fathom how one day it would be created, their stories reflect an mediation of fiction and fictional elements that are not objectively or historically true for their time period. No one discovered reanimation. The Christian canon was an bazar of how much they would bet the human would one day invent it based on personal ego. The New Testament had to be untrue in parts because "true" had not yet been defined according to the technology that would reanimate the dead. It's an massive super ego.
Worse Than Death
Worse than death is not the death of an body, No. But it is the death of the spirit. In worse than death what happens is your destiny presides over your fate, which is breaking and once you are trapped in its jar you suffer worse than death. An actual occurrence. And so unable to achieve your destiny, because your fate is broken. You suffer even more. It is an even worse fate to compound it buckling under anything you'd had promise to but eventually breaking could not promise anymore.
To be or not to be is the question. The roleplay generations, it's the new thing. Especially in Canada. Become an character whose ultimate genius is whose personality he becomes with. And so concluded upon the subject we motion to change the subject of what is fantasy role-playing game in the virtual economy? In Canada? In the reciprocal command economy. An new reciprocity might facilitate better the reciprocity of this Fantasy social system, the Elioites (an white magician sect) seek pure command reciprocity with gays to facilitate anti-terrorism globally. Become an character whose personality is something of the imagination. Who is fantastic. It is even harder to do when you have an mental illness. Every time you play an character you are punished somehow, egotistically, for being unable to present an cohesive character and "personality unit." People expect you to be unable to. They expect that that is the definition of an mental illness.
Experience, mostly, means having an delicate sense of what you can do with it with the time you have left. I have time in which to study how the human aesthetic dies in order to learn how to resurrect it. Death and worse are the scale by which you are to proceed talented that and resurrection from either is aesthetic. If aesthetic beauty is resurrected and the cognitive difficulty lift. The cognitive difficulty of having suffered worse than death, then the mental illness may be that characteristic of being not worse than death. But beautiful in this in its own right. Anna may benefit from this transition for she is an character battling with the fate worse than death, sometimes being crushed by it. And if she perchance to learn how to resurrect in an aesthetic sense of fiction that what is represented cannot capture all of what is known to exist. But that power in aesthetic resurrection is an humanizing product or agent. We are so sprawling in fates worse than death as an global civilization because we forget to look at them. Because of Christianity. Skewing the difference between death and worse than death. Scars on the face of humanity. Previously unnamed. Disregarded. They appear to me like an massive dent in the structure of the aesthetic of the Middle of Life Shape. That we are all connected by. We need an new religion, the Christianna, with emphasis on the Middle and the Fate Worse Than Death in order to heal its fates worse than death—to re-animate the human spirit—as an representative of religious spaces sharing fates worse than death.
In which everyone is welcome to identify with (the actual fates worse than death that exist on Earth in order to find an strategy to avoid them). The post-colonial development out of Christianity is marked as an departure from their practices. To an space more in-tune with fates worse than death providing them wisdom and healing from its deeply embedded scars and cultural perspective.
Great enough virtues had been achieved by humanity because of Christianity and the balance with all religion, that they had an payout to help people suffering worse than Jesus. Like Anna. And that's really how it must be recorded. Like Anna. For we suffer the fate worse than death like her. At the precise difference at which life becomes less valuable to you than death. You realize your fate worse than death. I believe sometime after my fate worse than death had been realized God sent Anna to me in an vision in order to save me from it. The price was that I was going to have to endure it as my actual fate until I could learn to deliver myself from it reliably, non-fictively in order to deliver others from it.
And why should I care not to share Anna's as an story of overcoming worse than death? The story of an Aesthetic Resurrection from the fate worse than death. Anna's Resurrection is the homo-esthetic resurrection from the fate worse than death, (the fate worse than death of whom has no aesthetic appeal (an-na)).
Homo-esthetic resurrection means all aesthetic resurrection of homo-esthetic, which is never worse than death. Because it is gay. LGBTπ, if we applied an homo-esthetic to it, would be the LGBT are already identifying four groups first among all sexualities. And why? Because they are under-represented! We mark the subtle shift in perspective between what had to be resurrected and what it was like now that it was. The Gay Oracle becomes an prominent figure again.
Thoughtstream:
#Experience
Experience means to know better than Wisdom because, what, is wisdom the ultimate form of knowledge or something? Maybe experience is better. There are more than one form of knowledge. But these main three, innocence, experience, and wisdom divided by their inherent characters which are similar insomuch as the subject figure has mirth. Like an axolotl. And that they with the LGBTπ community have formed an shield of innocence with which to wield the hammer of dimension and an shield between the four points of LGBTπ, Innocence, Wisdom, and Experience. One side of the hammer Love, Nyclepi, Ace, and Air Alt, and the other side of the hammer Satan. For when the young are naive the wise know better than their Experience, which is not tempered with age but grows from the beginning of age to its end. Where are collected the wise, who are more often Old but that can be inclusive to an younger audience.
Experience is individual and unique in character. We have more of it by having different types of it and experience of these 'individuality-of-character' memories. The more you can distinguish them separately the more Experience you must have.
And so we try to push the distinction between characters and their personalities.
Experience is not always the formation of wisdom because there are smaller units of philosophical currency than wisdom. Facts, for example. Though my primary form of currency in my thinking appears to have been non-facts (what we know that we don't know) than actual, you know, facts—what we do know. Experience is not always explainable in facts more than artifice, after all. For to describe artifice as an way of self-expression is factual enough, maybe? As an expression of what we don't have, which is factually the result of what we do have. History worse than death. Fates worse than death. I consider myself experienced because I suffered the Fate Worse Than Death and I learned to overcome it in some ways. I used my experience to overcome the fate worse than death because Experience is maturity (to be contested in wisdom against Age having more wisdom) and ample ideas generated in the creative function of youth that are not stymied with age. In these ways Experience and Wisdom are competitors half of the time. And the other half they are sorted, Experience trumping Wisdom, or Innocence trumping both Experience and Wisdom, so that any wisdom gained from experience is wisdom gained from innocence.
And that innocence in an type of wisdom is gained not by innocence or experience alone but by experience and innocence together.
An reliable point "to resurrect" the thought stream in this book toward an entry of knowledge into experience. If an entry of knowledge is created at the meeting point of innocence, experience, and wisdom reliably enough to make an point of punctuation then we can transcend the social thought stream by defining what is innocent, experienced, and knowledgeable about the thought stream that seems to inflict all of us. It's like going backwards an paradigm. The transition from thought stream to waking consciousness, interaction between innocence, experience, and wisdom in the workplace.
What would be accomplished by the proceeding?
Wisdom: we will guide you
Experience: we won't
Innocence: we can't
And if everyone falls into at least one of these categories we have enough of an reciprocal theory to politicize or contrast rampant unguided thought streaming. Like an great dolphin riding an wave.
An great dolphin riding an wave is an metaphor, modeled that innocence in an type of wisdom is gained not by innocence or experience alone but by experience and innocence together. In contrast to the Buddhist metaphor of crossing the river on an ferryboat. We instead cross it on an dolphin. An blue dolphin. And I think this image comes to mind because the axolotl is like the longer voyage from innocence, to experience, to wisdom, that we participate in every day. But if we extend innocence as an fact to their species the living specimen of an axolotl converges with the dolphin, and we have something of an hybridity. And this hybridity represents us, humans, crossing the wave between hybrid-evolution and genetic research, as an passage we will have crossed many times one day. But if it were with dolphin and axolotls I'd think we'd get there sooner. Axolotls can regenerate, after all. And dolphins are more of an big porpoise.
But if I allow these voices to separate, and let my use of this proto-punctuation to create an conversation of values extending from the meeting place of three souls, one of each, who each represent Innocence, Experience, and Wisdom. Innocence begins to speak up, saying, "how will I know that I had any information on the subject if I am innocent to it." And the Experienced will have said, "that is how we know you have gained experience from it."
The experienced would have said that if we share the experience of being innocent, experienced, or wise we become more experienced as an species.
The wise will have said more experience than wisdom is the best path, also. But with experience comes wisdom. For the fate worse than death as an axolotl subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment