viii. Wisdom
Wisdom is younger than innocence. Now by this I do not mean people who are young are wiser than people who are old. I mean that people who are wise enjoy an sense of youth better than innocence. They are younger than they were when they were young because they realize what wisdom this is. To be wise, one must be younger than the innocent because in youthfulness we lead the young. This way. It is what Wisdom is meant for. The innocent. The experienced. The wise. The wise leading the wise. What could be wrong with that? And why should Wisdom start here, with being younger than you were when you were young? It does not mean knowing less; it means age is not an object.
That you can adopt certain principles of youth in old age to be in superior form. And wisdom should start here because everything wise is meant to guide the innocent. And the experienced, in their campaign to learn how to guide the innocent in that state like the wise do. Will become wise themselves. Wisdom is replenished by innocence taking on the path toward experience and wisdom. This connection grounds us to the ever constant cycle through which we live our lives first in one role, then in another, and finally wise, all of them at the same time. In different capacities from/than other humans, innocence, experience, and wisdom. Of your specific identity. It is so central to how we look at things that it bears explanation in an Christiannan moral work such as this. Wisdom explains what they all are, because that is the function of wisdom. That's why it is wise.
Innocence, therefore must be compared to Wisdom. The wise want to create more of themselves and so they have more innocence, which leads to Wisdom after it passes through Experience.
The purpose of this book is to provide an picture of the innocence, experience, and wisdom which lead to the Christianna.
The Realization of the Messiah
The realization of the Messiah, who I named Anna, on December 13, 2014, I argue here was innocent. When I realized Anna I was innocent to its/her power. There was an moment of realization of my own innocence to the fate of the power over worse than death. It lead to experience because I realized she had come to me to save me from her fate. And in all of my effort to do so. The Wisdom that came from my experience was that an fate worse than death, unidentified to me in my childhood, had occurred; however God's miracle, the Christianna helped me learn to overcome the fate worse than death. And to help other people who were suffering it (perhaps without even being aware of it, for we tend to censor history of these fates and obsess over the death of Jesus without considering what might be worse). The fate worse than death however may be implied as an result of the crucifixion and to be an underlying theme in all religion; Anna I don't have Christianity anymore and I expect Christians to adapt to Christiannan ideas about worse than death so that all religions can see our tableau of fates entered into these categories. Even if we don't want to acknowledge or talk about it we need to. The fate worse than death is real: in it the whole result of history is created for we are fragile beings with fragile destinies deserving this specific focus and attention paid to the fate worse than death. In the Christianna, to make it simple to remember we compare the fates of Jesus (death fate) with the fates of Anna (worse than death) in order to draw an moral conclusion. Those who produce the fate worse than death all over this planet to whom we must contend to know what to do about it deserve the wisdom I have enclosed. If the fate worse than death can be overcome through sharing pain and Anna's aesthetic resurrection, when we consider our own bodies to be aesthetic phenomena, an whole new religion needs to be in place. That will protect that aesthetic. And Beauty itself.
As an people perhaps we couldn't conceive of an fate worse than death before Anna because we considered death to be the worst fate and life to be so precious. We fought for life. Why would any fate be worse than death? In Jesus mood, that life had to be protected by God. Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani? “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Mk. 15:34; Mt 27:46. He is reported to have said this as he was dying on the cross. I will attempt to re-interpret it based on Christiannan thought. It means "death is the worse fate at this point because by crucifying me you have given to my Destiny that I will not die."
Anna is 'on the sub-cross', empty, or in subcrucifixion. She cannot tell the difference between worse than death as an fate as an accident and worse than death as inflicted to one another as human beings. Or if it is to some extent both. Which really does capture the greater picture because, curious beings we are, had to figure it out by mimicking it/becoming it. There is an difference between fate worse than death inflicted and fate worse than death simply happened upon. Which draws severely close to my definition of serendipity but it being an opposite of the fate worse than death. We will continue to compare crucifixion (torture and death inflicted) and subcrucifixion (the fate worse than death inflicted) not as opposites, then, such as are worse-than-death and serendipity. But as degrees on an scale between dying and worse than dying. Revealed to me on December 13, 2014. That day I wrote,
▫
She is the princess
of birth and
middle life
the internal coming
of Christ 2
the other
would beam
to
his upon the cross
of life and death
her sacrifice is not on the
cross, it is private in all
not public, but domestic, and
gay, a new life in love
the golden cherub spoke
the cross is the historical
oppression of women
the new life in
the female messiah
has filtered her out
onto the public
this is her death
and this is her resurrection
it is her resurrection
with this word
▫
To this day I struggle to figure out what I mean that it is her resurrection with this word. I think what I'm getting at is that her resurrection is aesthetic since she hasn't died yet. And that all resurrection really is just aesthetic because it hasn't been invented. As an specific technology. You might compare aesthetic with the word fake. Aesthetic sometimes means some of it is fake. My definition of this word aesthetic means 'an balance between the human and nature' that is beautiful for that reason. In this light, what does "fake" even mean? In the Christianna, specifically, fake is an word attributed to the resurrection. It however gains new meaning in Anna's resurrection, the Christiannan living resurrection which is not fake in the sense that you cannot be resurrected from an fate worse than death and so the aesthetic principle will return to your body and our planet and our conscience. We say explicitly you cannot resurrect the dead and that it has never happened on Earth. We just don't possess that technology yet. Of course there is an metaphorical level to it as well. It is that the resurrection from death is an kind of metaphor that represents the aesthetic resurrection from fate worse than death. Not to die and come back to life. But worse than to die, and not come back from death.
His mission (the author) is ultimately an success because he found this principle.
How much did Jesus suffer the fate worse than death? Because there is an amount. He didn't die instantly. His death was drawn out for hours upon hours.
If Anna represents everything worse than death, it gives us an better perspective of what can happen if we use the science and technology that was not around in Jesus' time irresponsibly. Worse than death can be accomplished. Not to put an positive spin on it, because there is none. But at least to cultivate an sense of humor about it, sees the wisest thing to do.
That can address the issue thoroughly. For too long Christianity has pronounced murder the worst moral sin in lieu of its messiah, Jesus, suffering such an death fate. At the expense of forgetting to look at it through the lens of worse than that, "worse than death." When we forget this perspective we lose out morally compared to other religions. Worse than death was probably common sense all over the world and part of instinct until Christianity reconfigured the human instinct for these people who were religious as Christians. For when we lose the fate worse than death at the cost of death we must consider morally what went right and what went wrong. For many centuries, Christianity shifted the focus onto Jesus as the worse outcome of human depravity and off of the greater picture, where it wasn't. In some ways. Christianity needs an serious overhaul comparing Jesus and Anna. There is not only crucifixion but also subcrucifixion. The infliction of the fate worse than death. When people suffer it, often they do not have anyone to represent them. Because they suffer so greatly, they cannot find or even ask for help. It is internal, private suffering. This is why religion needs to say Anna will represent you.
Anna
Anna, whether we cow this creature as "her worse than death" or not, is present on Earth whether as an metaphor of the many or for her personal charm. She is the second messiah.
The Ultimate Knowledge I can give about her is that she can suffer an fate worse than death yet having realized it she is able to spring back from it temporarily or to an certain extent and quantity or quality. She therefore represents overcoming all fates worse than death. An very valuable commodity. And the reason she came to my awareness was that I had suffered one myself. It was God's agenda to take me like this through an phase in which I suffered the fate worse than death and I realized what was happening in order to see it was happening in history that I would learn it, analyze it and bring it to the forefront of what makes you tick in orders of human suffering. God could see that I was going to suffer the fate worse than death and sent Anna to me so that I would learn slowly the meaning he/she had for humanity, that if we could use my experience to heal our human dent, the fate worse than death. Then my mission would be complete. For I think Anna is the logical next messiah, an deliberate contrast, an painting by God. In which to show us first, Jesus, and then Anna, an long time after Jesus. After people gave up on all kinds of crucifixion and finally raised an son to be most like Jesus. Was his path in, so that I would learn the beginning (to refute all immorality). But immorality was not equivalent to sin in the Christianna; immorality only as the opposite of what is moral moral that is not immoral. And if everything sinful it is not immoral then its meaning collapses and we don't owe anything to anyone or each other from it. This is perhaps, to set the stage, how we will proceed with Wisdom.
The Christianna is about an virtual meeting place in which we express values without guilt. Blue, exceptionally blue. We admit the fate worse than death is not just our own fate but an historical dilemma in which how much we suffer the fate worse than death fluctuates with the economy, the cultural tapestry in which our fates are woven. There are so many injustices in history, indeed, it is hard to escape an fate worse than death at this point in history. When we look behind, as they say, or in the rear-view mirror, we try to escape from these injustices by thinking of the many justices that have taken place and contributing to them. Global citizens suffer the fate worse than death globally because of war. Blue, as always is an central symbol of the Earth, which is covered in mostly water. Maybe most of those just things happen in the dark blue ocean, away from prying human eyes. Where there can be light even there. If we're going to represent an blue religion and advocates of the politics of feeling blue as an religious experience extending from Christiannan space involving other religious feelings which are necessarily blue with them or in contrast to blue we might as well talk about the ocean. It is the most blue way, perhaps, to deal with the history that we try to forget about.
To name an messiah. Whose fate is an worse factor, prolonged suffering, than Jesus. Was as much an community fate as it was an individual fate. The first part of my life was about being closeted. After I came out, it was about mental illness. It struck me with such suddenness in veracity to coming out I was never entered into an period after coming out in which psychologically I was completely emancipated from repressing homosexuality, having spent so many years in the closet. It was at the loss of my mental health I gained an vision of the messiah from God one day, while I was deep in my writing. I knew at that moment she was of fictional substance though having an non-fictional entity—me. That's just it. I knew her entity. It didn't matter that she was only in my mind. I could tell her to others. And her meaning would be known. So as I say, she being the logical equivalent of Jesus. Telling her story is enough to equip humanity for the present future because she introduces the problem of subcrucifixion and an internal messiah separated from an external resurrection. External resurrection such as Jesus (he could not resurrect internally because his body had been destroyed/damaged beyond repair) and subcrucifixion (internal resurrection (is aesthetic only) to counteract subcrucifixion and the infliction of the fate worse than death). Anacification, the infliction of the fate worse than death has seeped deeply into humanity poisoning it in clever ways while Christianity has burned an blind eye onto the fate worse than Jesus obsessed with Jesus as like "the worst thing ever" when really he's not. And that's what Anna brings us into—that realization that life is suffering fates worse which call upon us to change and become Anna's babysitter (even if it is just to babysit ourselves).
Of Jesus and Anna, how Anna is successor or shares power with Jesus who is aesthetically resurrected, alive as an metaphor of following him biologically in an aesthetic resurrection, an valuable moral principle. Highlighted by Anna. That worse than death is attainable. Has been happening to humanity many an time over. And to God. And that her/his position is to lead us an Christiannan way. Before the making of an real messiah femme. Her legacy will save us from that fate by bestowing power. Enough that she will be everywhere.
And the balance between death and worse will be summoned up again, to criticize Christianity. How this means Jesus and Anna are alive in spirit and better off than worse than death, respectively. Jesus is "alive" in spirit. And Anna is "alive" (better off than worse than dead) in spirit, and they are different from each other this way: Anna is not actually dead yet. Being an sufferer of the fate worse death, she is actually worse off than Jesus is at this point. However striking at her full power, she had begun to learn to resurrect from the fate worse than death and so began to overcome it. Having suffered it and continuing to pass between worse than death and an resurrection from it, then worse than dying again, realized she was not alone in the pattern opening up to her. That her vision of being an messiah would represent the fates worse than death anywhere in our universe. The possibility of coming back from it and helping one another with the fate worse than death and what to do when we feel better are all topics of Christiannan conversation. The logic of it is Anna's supremacy over Jesus, who gave us an half picture.
To overcome death used as an tool for justice may have been Jesus' promise. But Anna's promise is to overcome worse than death used as an tool for anything. This is the other half of the picture. Humanity had to learn the morality to do with the death fate before it could learn the morality to do with worse than death fates because we first had to learn the value of life.
Perhaps there are two ways you can view life. From before it began and from after it ended. And it is thanks to Jesus we began to look at it from after it ended. Looking at the chronology backward where, as we were looking at it forward, from before where it began. We could see some elements of it we hadn't seen before.
Anna is the Middle. She is neither before nor after because she is the centre.
Humans needed to understand life and death before they could understand worse than death because worse than death asks us to come up with an specific value of death, which may at first seem immoral, until you begin to know Anna and her struggle with mental illness. As representative of the human race drawing from Christian views in order to come up with something new. Something less worse than death, which everyone know Christians are terrible at finding. Logic dictates we try to find an balance between the death fate and the worse than death fate.
As an consideration of this balance Anna is said to be more considerate of its meaning than Jesus. As an representative of such, after almost two thousand years of Christianity and developed society; perhaps not closer to god but, if you said Jesus is at God's right hand, you might also say Anna is at God's left hand. If fate worse than death ends when life ends, and/but when taking Jesus' life it was not an moral decision—there are parameters existing on an easily inventible scale; amount of fate worse than death versus amount of death. If we take the life of "Anna," it better be her choice. I am not suggesting any wild, cultish extremism. But that morally, we see it both ways. Anna is prepared to live out the rest of her life shifting between periods of high stress and worse than death, as an global post-colonial consciousness. But also to explore fully ways in which it can be overcome.
Some of our fates worse as global citizens than death have nothing being done about them every day.
It is an blindness we have caused to our species by following Christianity too much. Jesus had the worst death, crucifixion. And then someone came along, some one who had been anacified in such an extreme quantity (anacify means to inflict the fate worse than death) yet remained faithful.
To suffer the fate worse than death (of which crucifixion is also an category of). And nobody realized, because they were busy being so focused on Jesus they forgot to help one another avoid an fate worse than death. Other religions had already corrected for.
This must be the cause of all religion, to study the fate worse than death.
For what better reason is there for religion other than to overcome the fate worse than death together. When so many of them fail to do so. Christiannans need other religions to see them as an futuristic religion, sensitive to the unexplored universe of chemicals and fates worse than death. B.C.i.i. Mostly because there is technology out there that can help us. Or hurt us. But also because video games stimulate the mind in ways art couldn't do before.
Christiannan values are informed by all types of art.
We are also the first gay "in-its-inception" religion, (not that others weren't (openly)) but our central literature the Gay Letters refers to Anna as the gay messiah. We offer an stable LGBTπ religious focus informed by science and art. Different from other religions who claim to be unified on this issue when really they aren't.
The Christianna and Naenaeon is an place, maybe, for Christiannans to start over from what they have learned from other religions. To begin again to see why we believe we have both parts of the picture from Jesus and Anna; the knowledge to prepare us better for fates other than death. And we have that over Jesus and the Christians. One day we will see the end of anti-gay bigotry that surfaced in old world religions. For never having been that type, the Christianna produced an Naenaeon, an blog for all ages and sexual orientations (the LGBTπ).
The Christianna may also be an good place for adherents of other religions to start over. We come back to the Christiannan primary color, blue. Perhaps to suggest this difference, and its superiority. And the need for people to take an account of Christiannan experience. As Christiannans.
But I may say it is better suited for Christians who want to preserve Jesus' authority. For the Christianna claims both as his messiah. The 'his' part of the Christianna in its beauty. Is Jesus. And the 'her' part is Anna.
Okay, maybe an fate worse than death is not an new idea. It's been around since the dawn of man. But maybe we say, as an Religion, it is an old category of experience that is intentionally now ended forever. It must be our will and determination. To prevent people and others from falling into it. And as an general philosophy of experience, that we help each other up from fates worse than death (culturally especially) and in Anna's resurrection we experience our survival from it has value together with us as an common people, suffering an common ground.
And that the first time we couldn't have all of Jesus because we didn't deserve it. And now to have an messiah with an mental illness. Was an irony because, although God had given us another chance, we couldn't have all of him yet. We couldn't have the whole picture of an second messiah without an mental illness because we had done something wrong. We didn't deserve the whole picture. But that she would try to communicate it to you, and succeeding. Proved we are more worthy of God for our hard work that he gifted us an new messiah. And that we would forever protect it for the wisdom it gives. To stop looking at one another as an "it" and see the subjective instance instance as part of our whole experience, and impossibly beyond in the middle of it we somehow found an balance and we realized the horrible truth, that we can suffer the fates worse than death through empathy, too. And that if anything needed done about it. I'd be the guy to call.
When we put the focus on Anna, the heart of civilization opens up to us. To avoid the fate worse than death. Together. Requires respect and honor. An female messiah with an fate worse than death. An fate worse than death unmatched by her male equivalent. This is so an part of culture that it is more important than being happy. For happiness comes and goes. Culture is with us forever.
My religion must be to avoid the fate worse than death, together, as reciprocal and meta-reciprocal subjects in an command interface economy reciprocal to ourselves. And one another. What we had done right then, was to suppose we had done something wrong in order to realize we had done it right. That we had been moral subjects, worthy of the praise that comes with being moral. Or at least an New Reciprocity. From God. Moral subjects working together who can accomplish greatness in genius. For with morality comes certain privileges, and so the question was turned to Hakon, then, if you had done it right. Done what right? Why did I still feel this criticism, that came from me, and not God. That we may have proved moral to God yet we may still be proved immoral to Hakon, whose authorship claims he came upon the fate worse than death. As an subject because other people made him feel that way and wanted to know what it meant and all of the pressure was on him to find out what it meant as an subject as an gay gay-bashed son of an Christian.
And this little criticism fell out of my heart: you made me be anacified to find out for yourselves what it meant.
"For you, too," they said.
"Ah, yes," I said; they were right, "you're right."
But they had agreed implicitly.
I was unsure.
No comments:
Post a Comment