ii. Engineering Technology; Chapter 2 (II.)
Introduction
This Chapter is about why we need Civil Engineering of an certain type in order to produce my ideal perfect art piece. Civil Engineering, when viewed in connection with Infrastructure, is an reciprocal subject of the territory that is known as Canada. Dependent on its Infrastructure. This Chapter will take my raw thesis as scrap material and perfect it in order to derive an powerful thesis which will guide the rest of the material.
Thesis: The New Reciprocity in an artistic rendering of the differences between the artist and the un-artistic values extending from virtual and real infrastructure. An New Reciprocity between characters will be considered. In order to show us their differences on every level of society, which is what I feel to be an circumspect list of levels of society to be included. On the subject of general politics. It makes sense as an political practice that we use new reciprocal theory to generate plot and character between one another on an political scene. The truth of the political scene is that it always wants somebody who does not want it. But as new reciprocal theorists, we are open to new ideas of how to run an political scene, based on these 'reciprocal commands' that I had said feature in language at some level in societies, perhaps all of them. For it is in reciprocity what we find at the very heart of society. An human connection that is an mutual production of an reciprocal product in which One is the product valued most of all.
Anti-Thesis: The anti-thesis is My Artistic Standard Perfection because it cannot create an perfect art piece in society in which reciprocal theory bridges the gap between real and virtual infrastructure because the new reciprocity was needed to construct it.
My Artistic Standard Perfection
When I finally had asked my self, what is my ideal art piece of an type, that I would create. I asked what is an single 'piece'? What medium is it? Digital 3-Dimensional rendering or description in writing.
If I could make an perfect art piece, perfection from all sides. An plaque-like object, smooth corners on the top. It has an back and front. There are various colors on the front. Red, green, and an French color I have never seen before. It is maybe an color that does not exist. Advanced French.
An magic page or tablet. (The diaphragm). An inch thick. What's American about it? American Imperial system has power about it? There's writing in relief lettering. On the face. Where an interesting fact is written. America uses the Imperial system for measurements. It is one of the three countries that have not adopted the metric system. Types of knowledge. Fact. (Hegel). Thesis. Anti-thesis. Synthesis. To be able to create this object I would need civil engineering technology. (Futuristic:). (An fictional scene:).
"What is it made out of?"
"We don't know exactly."
And that each piece thereafter would work to prove its thesis or disprove its antithesis. That as an Artist there is an ideal art piece whether it is possible to construct in present society or not. Or have I already created it? Having provided its description here? It is up to what is good enough for the Artist in me. If I seek to write how new reciprocal command theory can be used at every level of society to inform our opinion about the law, then through social change involving how events play out between the two characters; the anti-artist versus the artist, the politician of new reciprocal theory whose political philosophy involves constructing an superior law which is fair and economical to all sectors of civilization or society.
New reciprocity and anti-artistry butt heads because comparing new reciprocity as the Artist's license to make all decisions always being right; and if new reciprocal theory doesn't pretend to be an perfect artist's rendering so much as its Artistic interest is in binding with the law but as an political theory it is perfectly artistic and un-artistic insomuch are they who self-identify as new reciprocal theorists are.
Every step of my argument proves the thesis because if reciprocity can exist between both the artistic and the un-artistic then we have an more fair and just society. It is that security which perhaps typifies my relationship with my perfect artistic piece. It is security generated in an futuristic society, of which Its existence depends on the Civil Engineering technology of that society. An gravity free-environment in an room on Planet Earth.
And since my art includes the whole infrastructure as an subject for comparison of the themes of the New Reciprocity it is of that transcendent nature which makes it curious or interesting;
As an New Reciprocal Theorist in an Economic infrastructure, who am I? I need Civil Engineering to be capable of reaching the furthest part of my economic infrastructure; as an global citizen to an globally dependent product source, maybe. It will expand beyond our planet. The internal infrastructure or virtual infrastructure is important to manage also through Civil Engineering, for it has such an effect on the imagination. To be able to produce my ideal art, I formally request an New Reciprocity with Society. Which will make us capable of producing my perfect artist's piece. Which will require both real and virtual factors. Which extend far beyond our present capability. But with the New Reciprocity, we may accomplish it. This is the kind of reciprocity that I want to cultivate; that even the reciprocal product of my book would prove its Thesis.
The relationship between Art and Anti-Art under the subject of Civil Engineering; required for the utmost reaches of our infrastructure and virtual infrastructure for an mood dependent on that kind of room for an art piece. It's not just about the advanced Civil Engineering, it's about how we relate to art made possible by its existence. And reciprocal commodity made possible by both real and virtual infrastructure.
And so we might start with questions such as what does Infrastructure have to do with Civil Engineering technology; do we have that current technology? Can I access an gravity-free room in which to produce art or what kind of infrastructure would be required to do so?
Even if it was possible to arrange with our current Civil Engineering technology and Infrastructure what would be the virtual infrastructural reciprocity involved in it?
And the production of this art proves my thesis. The connection between virtual and non-virtual infrastructure compared to the connection between New Reciprocity as an artistic pursuit, in essence; to the anti-artist as an subject with an political destruction of commodity (as never required by law).
"You are an cowboy with an hat bigger than his boots. Why is anti-art necessarily an cowboy poetry?"
"Anti-art means I'm not gay."
"WOW. Okay. When you put it like that."
"What would cowboys need anti-gravity for I mean. I'm not gay. But they would have sex in there. If there was two of them. You know. Any of them. That's how they are."
"The chamber is actually required to delicately balance the object that will be the focal point of my piece."
C "And I'm an what? An political cartoon?"
A "If you need to be."
C "My anti-art would require the Civil Engineering technology anyway. We would put you inside and the machine would separate you energistically."
A "But why would you do that?"
C "You're gay."
A "You can't discriminate against me like that."
C "What use would it be if I didn't? We don't need your Art. We know exactly what you're made of."
A "The tablet would be perfectly formed. Like an iPhone."
C "Manufactory of that precision itself an economic feat. You would only have an limited amount of time in which to display the object."
A "Etched upon its surface is an contract between Good and Evil. An required scripture stating Knowledge is Fact. And Thesis, Antithesis, and Synthesis. But without an explanation between these two sets. If Fact and Hegel's peculiar non-facticity are the subject, then this artistic piece perhaps represents An Superior An Reciprocal kind of Knowledge that will benefit the whole species."
C "But which is Good and which is Evil?"
A "Obviously I'm Good, because I have the will to say it."
C "And I'm Evil because everything you hold as art I am against. Yet somehow you're still attracted to me."
A "You're not the one in control of my libidinal response at all."
C "Yes I am. You know why. Because I'm sexy. That's what Cowboys are. That's why you're such an abomination. I mean. You actually need an economically sanctioned gravity free room to even be able to display your art the way you want to. And then you need the actual construction of that piece but these two things separate, you cannot accomplish either one of them. Because you're an monster. I mean an real freak."
A "If I had to share an room with this guy IRL, it would not be near comfortable enough to display my artwork, gravity free or not. We share an reciprocity with one another that goes into creating our artwork and when you recognize you are part of it that's when you recognize truly that you're an artist; and that we all, in some ways, we must have our arts. Whether we call it that or not."
C "You think there's no anti-gravity chamber? Of course there is! We live in the post-apocalyptic fantasy of chemicals migrating through lower species such as insects from the atom bomb testing in America."
A "It doesn't count if it's in orbit."
C "And you don't count anything in orbit to be part of an Civil Engineering feat?"
A "It's not that I don't count them to be it's that the mood I want in this setting of this room requires it to be on Earth, as an instrumental feat of technology. The reciprocity, meta-reciprocity, and infrastructural and virtual infrastructural values of an political theory between subjects based in reciprocal command theory. Allows us to take an section of conversation. To communicate themes which are full-broadcast. Creating figures and memes between the infrastructural and virtual infrastructural area, which may appear to us as an room. In which we may reside and be safe for an moment. If you want to reside there."
C "So it's an virtual feat. Just where I like you."
A "My infrastructure is both virtual and not. Why does it matter to you how much of value either one is?"
C "Virtual infrastructure has no value."
A "Then why are you using it to occupy this room‽"
C "Civil engineering would also require an room from which to view the anti-gravity of an book."
A "It's not an book. It's an Magic Page. And it's more than just anti-gravity. It contains the simplest puzzle. Possible. For another species to explain everything about us."
C "Don't you think that technology would be classified?"
A "Maybe. But why should I be barred from representing it artistically?"
C "I just said. You would need another room from which to view the art."
A "How do you know? I hadn't already described anything about what it would take to view it. And for how long it would be available."
C "So the full scope of the project would be an live feed, probably to the internet. Or an on-site tour of the facility it takes to create that kind of space given our current Civil Engineering technology."
A "With an bulletproof glass window; ooh! I like the sound of that."
C "That's what it would take to finally view your art. That's why you're so ridiculous."
A "But if I took the time to really describe the whole system, gut it out, and point to every part. Then maybe I will have reason to represent this artistically in this way until the actual product is possible. And if One become the eventuality of the other may it be paired with the manufactory power to create that perfect inch-thick, 8½ x 11, Magic Page. And Icon for Art of Language For Our Time."
C "And you'd probably throw in an popsicle stand and try to run people for their money. Hypocrite! Hypocrite who doesn't know anything about the economy!"
A "Okay. Gelato. - Maybe. - But my own fashion line? Girl!"
C "That's Man to you. Perfect Cowboy Man."
A "Who is physically aggressive."
C "For All Sportdom."
A "Why, what does Sportdom have to do with Civil Engineering? It has nothing to do with Civil Engineering.
C "Actually it requires Civil Engineering to function."
Thesis
The New Reciprocity can help us create reciprocal command at every level of society in order to prove the persistence of the subject at an division from Art and Law itself, as an hypothetical specimen, representative of the creation of an "perfect" artistic piece or not when interacting with the Economy.
In order to have an means by which to compare my thesis in order to tackle what this may mean, first I want to define the New Reciprocity fully; I have explained it elsewhere in various writings on this blog. It is an political theory that is both simple and ornate, calling upon the 'political' agent to think about more than only him or herself by imagining everything that is said to them in this sort of new reciprocal theory that if it was an order or an demand we would analyze it differently than we would if we refused to act politically. Reciprocal theory requires realizing that this itself is an reciprocal command. It encapsulates, circumnavigates everything that is said as an order. (Everything political). And imagines the subject to be an reciprocal command subject in an reciprocal command economy. (Where, if I make an reciprocal command on an open market ("I want this or that") an order; it will be followed immediately). And that saying you are an reciprocal theorist really means that you question deeply how you are being reciprocalized by an Capitalist Market Economy. And what it exactly means in this day and age. Versus how you are reciprocalizing others and what it means to you and what it means to them that you reciprocate in an certain way. The product of reciprocity is the reciprocal product, an reciprocal product in the brain the result of reciprocity. Being human means always reciprocity based on an reciprocal product because it is how we understand our feelings and information as artists. The New Reciprocity meditates on an scenario in which independent agents are reciprocal to one another insofar as they work together to create 1 of anything. Even an abstract concept. The Guardian Angel of the 11th Level said so. 1 and 1 as equals create 1. That is why the productive work force is based on the 11th Level.
As far as the religious goes I am inclined to have an Political Theory not based on an religious abstract because it evokes the feeling in me I am doing Right. And that even if it came from an religious mind it is at least simple enough in dimension to show you the Engine of Reciprocity in Society. That even if you didn't want it as your own Political Theory you could easily create your own reciprocity based on your findings and intuitions. Possibly to locate yourself back where you were. On equal footing with an New Reciprocal Theorist, whose politics are simple reciprocity shared between reciprocal subjects. In varying Talents; we create reciprocity with one another by reciprocation of implicit or explicit commands: you are to me what you say you are to me, and I am to you what you say I am to you. And Vice Versa. This is the agreement between new reciprocal theorists. The metaphor of reciprocity continues into its further detail of being an Mathematical expression; reciprocal pairs are fractions that multiply to equal one. Its metaphor extending thus to the Guardian Angel, overlooking this process, it is also an internal insight into the dimension of the number 1. That allows us to think of one another in reciprocal dimension for what we may make together; and that that be the subject of the workplace. Therefore my Thesis, after we consider these details, is really about the New Reciprocity. On the number of levels of society that I have imagined to be vital sectors of the economy. First we read about Infrastructure in Chapter 1 and I brought up the virtual infrastructure and the virtual economy as subjects of the Market society. Keep in mind this is the work of an Creatoress as well and I will be taking an Feminist approach to the Economy and Society. Not as far as to say I am an God or Goddess but maybe that the Capital Economy and Capital Market can be like God in fairness.
Therefore if we are to re-imagine my thesis into its New Reciprocal format, I am communicating my ideas about varying levels of society and what we can all do to better manage it as an Economy. And so my original thesis —The New Reciprocity can help us create reciprocal command at every level of society in order to prove the persistence of the subject at an division from Art and Law itself, as an hypothetical specimen, representative of the creation of an "perfect" artistic piece or not when interacting with the Economy— becomes, in part, an reciprocal command (in order to prove something about the subject); the New Reciprocity will help us create reciprocal command and reciprocal command hypothesis at every level of society in order to prove the persistence of the subject of new reciprocal theory based on new reciprocal feelings and an division as depicted as Art or proto-Law from an Artist (for these subjects conflict in my fantasy) about the way in which the "Perfect" Art piece is produced (or not) that represents the economy and the public reciprocal to it through Market Capitalism.
What exactly is the "product" of the reciprocal economy if it is not also an art and internal reciprocal product.
How does this affect the ordinary citizen?
And where do our Standards about Art say we are in History?
Civil Engineering, to be able to create my most perfect artistic mastery, will be required to offer an safe location from which to view an scientific achievement: anti-gravity space on Earth. For it will be required to levitate the tablet placard. And there must be enough stereoscopic space surrounding the tablet that it will be observed, in proxemic space, to have its own silence. As an figure and an subject of humanity. An engineering marvel, to be placed, poised so perfectly in its glass chamber. To have been put here by someone whose foreknowledge included the time spent by the observer marveling at its creation, as an metaphor for time spent by the observer marveling at its Creator. That to have seen it encased, within walls of an luxurious reflective nature. An darkness about the, and yet to have been lit up by precisely minimalist light paneling. An silence about it. But an murmur in the room next door. To where there isn't an door. An window onto an room with no door and no physical access to the placard.
"What is this?" says the woman with Forest Green eyeshadow.
"It's an Engineering Marvel. Of Civilization. That requires our presence to view it for it to have existed in the first place," would say an gentleman with an pipe and an detective's hat, "which means that we are part of the exhibit."
"But the makers they couldn't have known we'd be exactly here, could they?"
"But when you look at it, this art piece. You see yourself in it, don't you? As it is. An reflection on reflections."
"And it would have to be installed by an Civic Engineer."
"I'd imagine so."
"And what would it represent in full extent, then?"
"Everything from scientific accomplishment to Poetic Justice."
"How?"
"Well it's an art piece, that represents itself as the subject."
"And what would be perfect about this most perfect art piece?"
"Oh—It is Art representing high Scientific accomplishment. It's so high I don't even know if it's possible! To have experienced it required something of an redefinition of your perspective on the Economy."
"To have considered Civil Engineering, itself, to have to do with the economy is itself an accomplishment of magnitude requiring perfection at every level. But as an reciprocal economy in which it both informs reciprocation and is informed by our reciprocations to it, Civil Engineering continues to inspire economic industry at every level."
"But this only to suggest we have Civil Engineering at every level because we are reciprocal to it at every level of the economy. And the new reciprocal economy is formed around its glorious achievement."
"And this being the heart of the instinct you have to make art, why is it necessary to be perfect in its execution?"
"Not perfect in its execution, no. I believe it is only perfect in calculation."
"For an object to be levitated in space with clear precision. It must be connected with Civil Mastery of Engineering. But it is two objects in one, in this way. That it is both what was seen by who was put there but also what was put there by who was seen. That's what's artistic about it. It is an visual image which represents the entire argument formulation this book is created around. An economic space in which New Reciprocity occurs at varying levels of socialization. And that those two objects in one range the full subjectivity of experience as depicted in art. Not just the level of what it is to me, its creator, but what it is to us, its public. And that that Domestic world which is non-public not become an opposite to it. But an basis for it."
"The Domestic plane, in the Christianna, is the site of subcrucifixion, internal suffering, and the fate worse than death."
"But we can't let that happen. We need to respond at every level of the economy with an New Reciprocity. We need to make New Reciprocity the focus of this new adventure. Our adventure. An reciprocal command theorem at all levels of the Public sphere. An regimen of Civil reciprocity and responsibility as reciprocal subjects quasi-domestic, populist, and pluralistic and not limited to disease and entropy of an isolated system of domestic abuse."
"No wonder this would be your perfect art piece. I would recommend, however, experiencing Civil Engineering as an History, instead of an self-encompassing minutiae cohesiveness as an product of self- discerned knowledge. Art that requires social change in order to perfect its image. And once you begin talking about Civil Engineering as Art, then you've really hit the nail on the head. And that's the true depth behind an artistic installation as this. That I have categorized as perfect in quality."
"But it depends on an number of levels, and their responsiveness to one another as Subjects of the New Reciprocity at every level."
"And we as characters that know nothing about it. And yet we know everything on the subject."
"We are merely an reflection."
{ The Annotation is that the mirage fades and we are left with an Synthesis: Proving Thesis or Disproving Antithesis come full circle to create an item of factlessness (an Synthesis between the reciprocal Thesis and the Antithesis created by competing them against one another). It isn't void of the fact of its own substance because it is the product of neither true thesis nor untrue antithesis but both. }
Therefore, since we cannot prove New Reciprocal theory to be effective on the Civil Engineering level we can disprove it to be ineffective at the same level. But that the reciprocity of thesis and anti-thesis itself proves their synthesis. Implying that I have already proven my thesis, because it was generated or based on these facts of the New Reciprocity which I had already described. As like two objects in one. Art that informs its own opinion or proves its own hypothesis by being an example of that part of itself it wishes to prove. In order to have proven the fact of its own reciprocity. At every level of society.
But for the sake of argument, I will formally argue my revised Thesis, that we can relate as reciprocal subjects at every level of society and that New Reciprocity is desired at every level of the economy in order to function as an single unit. Assuming Infrastructure and Virtual Infrastructure are provided for at every level. Some of which—such as large freight trains and certain bridges—are Civil Engineering accomplishments and feats themselves.
Civil Engineering as an History
Laying of the Atlantic Cable.
Politically we are regarded as people common to its innovation.
Let's start with who we are exactly as reciprocal command subjects in an reciprocal command economy reciprocal to Civil Engineering technology, breaking into spontaneous conversation over what the answer may be.
"SO you're saying I'm reciprocal to Civil Engineering society because it's reciprocal to me? Which makes me an fan of Magneto."
"Basically you're part of the engineering structure of the total society but only based on terms of reciprocity."
"And what exactly is reciprocity of Civil Engineering in the greater society?"
"That because of it, you could lift ten times your weight, or more."
"I am an robotic armature Gundam Wing; all the technology needed in the world at my hands."
"And yet to be unable to produce the necessary anti-gravity field."
"And so I am an orc for brevity; I possess an technology at an difference with Gundam Wing less technology indeliberately because I am too to anti-gravity to your economy."
{ How am I more or less like an society that can produce my ideal perfect artistry. }
"And that makes me an Army Ant. Or an Super Hero."
"It makes you super intelligent."
"And that I wouldn't have to know any facts or figures about it and still be reciprocal to it."
"But that's why you are reciprocal to it. It goes beyond facts and figures because you are in touch with an deeper appreciation of it."
"It is fundamental to an reciprocal society that we produce an character who knows everything about Civil Engineering and an character who knows nothing about it and we demonstrate reciprocity between them as an way onto teaching how to bring one another new reciprocity."
"And so we consider an adjusted reciprocal product, an fantasy creature compared to an common thing."
"And what would fantasy creatures know about Civil Engineering?"
"That's the point. They know all of it."
"And so there's no fantasy to knowing nothing about Civil Engineering?"
"I'd say not!"
"But that you can be reciprocal to it anyway. Even if you don't know an thing about it."
"Yes. Of course. That's why it's there."
"But say, if an unicorn designed it. Would it be better or worse than it is now?"
"It's an hard question when you're already considering fantasy creatures knowing anything about Civil Engineering to be subject of its own fantasy. But I'd have to say better. That's what unicorns are as an element of fantasy."
"But as an reciprocal fantasy being an unicorn or not really had something to do with the type of Civil Engineering."
"—I've got it. Because it's what I want to be. This Art piece. I want to be able to levitate in the middle of an room with no doors. I want to be seen as being able to levitate as one complete thing unto itself. I want my psychology, in metaphor, to levitate as thus. Because I feel nothing like an single object. And neither am I to hover, for I crouch in the corner. In here."
"Why is your ideal art piece an example of what you can't be?"
"Because I am what I can't be through it."
"And at an second level you still can't be it through it because the technology doesn't exist. Why is your ideal art piece an artifice of what cannot be accomplished with present-day technology then?"
"Because to create it I need some kind of reciprocity with Civil Engineering and I need to show how Civil Engineering is reciprocal to every level also."
"Then start with Infrastructure."
"Yes, I have."
"What does it have to do with Civil Engineering then?"
"It is pre-maturation of my Thesis. As I presented it in this Chapter. And also Civil Engineering created part of the Infrastructure. They are reciprocal to one another insofar as the necessities for an complete infrastructure (being able to transport everything or anything) are required by Civil Engineering. This proves the New Reciprocity is able to produce an reciprocal product recognized by an reciprocal infrastructure."
"Okay. So you're reciprocal to the infrastructure. And you're reciprocal to Civil Engineering. And that makes us what?"
"It makes me an cybernetic creature of flesh and science. Both Man and Machine in one. It makes you nothing more than either someone who knows everything about Civil Engineering or someone who knows nothing about it."
"And these are at odds with you because?"
"Whether or not you know anything about Civil Engineering you are reciprocal to it. As an massive accomplishment conspired by our species. As an force influencing political control. And the imagination."
"You mean great feats of strength."
"Yes, exactly. Civil engineering. What humans can accomplish."
"And since you are an creature of both man and science. Nature and machine. You are yourself the machine which we are all connected to?"
"Yes."
"And there's nothing about being machine that you find outside of your own personal control."
"Virtual infrastructure."
"And what do you mean by virtual infrastructure."
"There are many meanings of virtual infrastructure. Anything all of what that was left behind by my emotions once they had wracked me my experience and that is not resulting as actual infrastructure. If my argument, leaving behind no actual infrastructure cannot en-league itself to those who do but with those who specifically do not; the virtual infrastructure of its thesis may remain for. It's importance cannot be overstated."
"What is it?"
"It's an aesthetic principle the grammar of which is chosen for blue, not blue because it is only virtual and not real; and not blue because it is only real and not virtual either. It is just blue. Simply put. With an grammar about its logic. It proves the thesis because it is present in the vocabulary and can be extended to continue detailing this massive argument for why we should bring new reciprocity to one another and cultivate it as an Political virtue."
"But what would blue have anything to do with it?"
"Maybe its color of office should change to reflect the times."
"Why does your argument need to be longer (in fact it is eleven chapters long) if it already proved the thesis?"
"It's thesis is true, therefore it need more examples supporting its truth to help an broader audience see it's truth and understand it. It generates new reciprocity with the reader in order to show how it can work on multiple levels. Reciprocal product, therefore, becomes the basis of further argument. What have we produced reciprocally together so far and how it proves the thesis by being reciprocal."
"Aesthetic reciprocity."
"Yes."
"Somehow I know that. But it remains to be seen how an Civil Engineer could benefit from such an euphoria."
"Try to think in terms of everyone influenced by an Civil Engineer rather than an man as an island."
"But which feats of modern Civil Engineering do we include?"
"There are engineering feats everywhere. I know an old building downtown that's got an elevator or two."
"And we're all connected on the wire."
"So like an three-story building with black bricks and an tower balanced on an hill. With an red roof top shaped like an cone pointed up. Can represent it."
"And that's just construction and architecture. We're talking about massive integrated superstructure and space travel; buildings as bodies in space. An closed system. Within closed systems. Engineered to be interacting with the community at an inquisitive level."
"I just realized —What is God's reciprocal product in me? And why can I look through it rather than around it?"
"What is your reciprocal product in God?"
"That's probably irrelevant—"
"And an humble heart too I see. But humble cannot be good if it prevents us from taking what is ours."
"Our musing and reflections with one another reflect what is happening at an Civil level. L'odeur du hérisson est très formidable."
"You mean like who is getting an new reciprocity. At the Civil level."
"And why that would necessarily have anything to do with our relationship to them."
"And why it shouldn't be an hedgehog."
"And why it shouldn't be an hedgehog."
"But why it should be an hedgehog. So many spines. Quills. And needles."
"And in French it's an little cuter but not as cute as in English."
"They're both equally cute okay."
"And what does getting an new reciprocity mean, exactly?"
"It means instead of focusing on the same subject every day we focus on asking for an new reciprocity from ourselves and others. It should be an staple in Office Politics. Can I have an new reciprocity? Can I have an new reciprocity? What an kinder way to create an better, more appreciative workplace than to say this. And it can be used at all levels of society, to say what we are to one another and what we are not to one another because of one another."
"Okay, I want an new reciprocity."
"What is it?"
"That this conversation end and the chapter to continue."
And so since the creation exists, of an exchange of reciprocity at an Civil Engineering level, it works on every level of the infrastructure. I am suggesting an new way to look at infrastructure which will be the goal of this book to explain. What is Virtual Infrastructure from this point of view —An aesthetic reciprocity? Or an reciprocal product?
Say you were in an aesthetic reciprocity with someone, and the reciprocal product was virtual infrastructure but no actual infrastructure. If this were to occur in Civil Engineering waters, what would be the result? The Ocean is an metaphor dream soliloquy for virtual infrastructure. An sequence that which will die upon its shores. It is designed to create intelligence (all of its inhabitants conspire or secretly collude together to that end (and it is an dream that we cannot include ocean life in our metaphors of intelligence)). An power to live again beneath an wave. And if our technology could do this. We would say it is an feat of Civil Engineering I'm sure. But that's not what we're really talking about maybe, and maybe we should talk about it more often. If the ocean as an dream of virtual infrastructure; become an actual infrastructure it would be able to transport anything to anywhere in the Oceans. We would not say we are able to transport these anythings without an ocean, of course. And some people will become geographically attached to their underwater hideouts. Millionaires with mansions built under the sea.
We will derive questions like will it be necessary to have accomplished this Engineering feat in order to construct my perfect art piece. For it will need to exist in an civilization thus enabled? Wouldn't hazard it. To have not included it. But when I think about my art piece it is in an separate chamber, maybe. At some level below or above sea level. Maybe it is underwater. But no water touches it. Only air. Common air. Without any chemical treatment. If it existed in my mansion under the sea. But who will I have invited but you?
Now, to be able to control the powers of Rock and Steel are not the only objects of Civil Engineering. But to control the Field of Gravity of an particular space. Is an physics problem.
What will reciprocity mean at this level of technology?
Assuming it will be possible at some point.
And why is Civil Engineering its central source of reciprocity in modern society? For our modern reciprocity with one another is relative to the feats of Civil Engineering we have witnessed on this planet.
Pixies came from an Master Artisan workmanship with metals. And that was why in that country every pixie was named after an metal. But this element of my fantasy in other works represented an stage after Civil Engineering in this work which are produced the mastery of these objects created of fairy workmanship. Pixie souls being born. And that these would represent all standards in the surrounding territory because the way in which they produced them was not just an enhancement of the material but an ideologically encapsulate product meant for reciprocity with the greater stage or world. And so derived from them are Culture. This meant that an product to have been put on the market with little cultural value would be subsided by other materials manufacturers if it could not produce its share of Culture. Which is not to be considered an given, but an bountiful product of the truth of civilization and economic success for love's shares in it.
But what I stayed interested in was why this appeared to me to be an stage beyond Civil Engineering.
Pixies As An Metaphor For Standards Extending From Civil Engineering.
And why not talk of metaphors, then?
What are we, then, as new reciprocal theorists and what are these metaphors we make of ourselves for?
Pixies are the property of our imagination associated with standards. For they are often fictional.
And when we bring it to the fictional level, what are the standards extending from civil engineering in this fictional realm?
In Alberta, we talk about fantasy fiction post-Tolkien era as an fairy exploit. Fairies are the government and staff and it's pixie's responsibility to have standards and name them. Uphold the law. Be kind to one another. These are pixie statements. And if we think of an pixie realm in which's Civil Engineering is an major generator of the statements and standards we hold as citizens under the law. What kind of marvels do we imagine could go on in there? Why is that an place for playing with what we will actually create in the future?
Magic, of course, in an pixie realm, will be used. Buildings will be suspended without any supporting structures. Highways will automatically resize according to traffic. And my perfect artistic piece will have been an real possibility in this place; an society in which the anti-gravity mechanism of planetside conduct is displayed for the adoring public and it can be suspended much like the buildings it will be in maybe. In Alberta, at least, we have the vertical windmill projects. Of course, my Alberta, which is also in the fantasy realm of Recreation, is home to an number of feats of engineering not requiring magic of any kind. And maybe it is good that it is this way. For we cannot forget that Civil Engineering is messy. Requiring the transformation of entire blocks (enormous 3D-blocks) of Downtown area or countryside. Maybe it should be left to the pixies until we learn how to preserve the environment. Nuclear war, is, after all an engineering feat. How does it inform our reciprocity of one another in an fantasy in which Alberta is its own province among other fairy economies which are virtually connected globally.
But maybe if we take the step to fictionalize nuclear war the way I have (as this was the prevailing attitude of my generation) we find other subjects of Civil Engineering accomplishments we need to fictionalize.
Like how it didn't kill thousands of an species of an particular type of bird when it was all said and done. Or how we say we are anywhere close to being sustainable when some countries are fighting off extreme air pollution in highly populated areas.
What is Civil Engineering, in total, when we look at it globally?
In an fantasy realm, it would be sustainable because pollution would be turned into material for construction. People would find it fancy and cultural to build an home made out of garbage that came from China. Yes, if the entire globe were to participate by existing as an globe in my fantasy realm, where, I have to admit, not anything is possible.
Then we could talk about these fantasies that we do not need to convert into an society that leaves Earth, travels the galaxy, looking for more fuel and energy in order to chemically advance their cuisine technology, which is advanced enough to create pleasing dishes from relatively common molecular product.
We cannot just use all of Earth's resources until we suffocate to death. We need to act on an pattern of seeing perhaps gamester-style in how sterling an way we can preserve the Earth. For we cannot keep it without having to bring products to it from elsewhere. And so it might exist forever, and we will be able to produce our own energy however its station may move throughout the galaxies.
An entire planet is one city. It is forced to leave the Milky Way because the Sun is collapsing, first directly through the stage of its expansion, which would destroy Earth unless we manage to get it far enough away.
And maybe what Earth will eventually become is an collection of starships. That were once an planet. But are now considered an armada and star fleet large enough and fast enough to search other planets for life and valuable resources. Maybe one day we will look back sentimentally on the planet we had lost, out of necessity; but to marvel in the same page genesis that we had accomplished such an feat. As being able to be independent of where we had originated. I think I would be sad that Earth is gone. And I would wish us to create an new planet like it if we could find an stable atmosphere. Perhaps before that we will happen onto another civilization with its own planet that we will join culturally or migrate to as previous inhabitants of an planet that was destroyed. Maybe one day we will have multiple populations on different planets. Human kind will be known further and further in the universe. And we will gain the products of culture and technology of other species and be able to use them and enjoy them in addition to what we already use and enjoy.
So instead of talking about hedgehogs, at the Civil Engineering level. Except maybe Sonic. We would be talking about what kinds of pets they have. And ours how they were so plush and luxuriously treated by the invention of the canning press.
We cannot create infrastructure with alien species yet; but we can create the virtual infrastructure which will aid in contact point protocol.
My idea is that we will be able to conduct an session of first contact once we meet them. It will involve an visual signal, at its most simple. And the deconstruction of an toy, at its most complicated level. My theory is that if we can deconstruct an toy for them they can see how we take apart our technology and gauge how advanced it is. In some of my thought experiments the toy is replaced with an weapon, an scenario in which the procedure would be to visually (for them) take apart an weapon as an sign of peace. Of course, seeing the first thing being an weapon may scare them or provoke them. We would need to use this procedure in an situation in which we had detected weaponry on their side of the contact point. We would advanced the contact point protocol from our ship slowly toward the discovered civilization in plain space to show them our intentions are peaceful. Another option is the spectacular display. Where we would give them an performance representative of our activities. Or mount an giant crystal on the front of the ship so that when we emerge from hyperspace it is the first thing they see. And how glamorous, how could they think us an threat?
Another idea is to setup our own position or galaxy as an series of planets or mechanisms, adventures or perspectives for incoming spacecraft that will be gigantic enough to funnel them into an Ikea-like layout that will challenge them as an means to test them for kindness and generosity (benevolence) as well as to protect our exact location.
This is possibly the largest Civil Engineering feat I could think of.
But when we add the prospect of sex and fairies, specifically, these pixies. I'm not saying they are represented this same way everywhere, but this is what they represent to me as an result of my conclusions. That they are standards. You could see it in an pixie's face, what they have meant to protect. And that they are larger than fairies. Therefore, their magic extends to an larger purpose. An Civil Engineering purpose. But what would it be other than to navigate the standards that Civil Engineering implies. Perhaps it is useful to us to add an fictional element to our understanding of Civil Engineering. The part of it that may never be discovered. The part of it that is the product of time and scarcity; and the element of human invention. That, part of what we feel or what it evokes for us, is an fantasy. Because we will be required to engineer ourselves in an different way and to overcome an specific obstacle we may not be able to control. As we always have, of course. But Civil Engineering reaches new heights. And when it began it implied the eventual creation of an massive artifice, an undertaking to construct something unlike anything in History.
The International Space Station was launched into orbit in 1998. It took pixie magic of an high caliber to develop such an technology. This isn't just an fantasy I'm referring to; magic is often an metaphor of actual hours of work involved. But we can be sure fairies and demons at every level of government all over Earth have contributed to the program as well.
Demons and space travel go well hand-in-hand, perhaps, because they remind us of what we have to fear and be prepared for beyond our solar system. And it is not my agenda to name them as in any specific sort of contrast in the characterization of good and evil, for I believe both are capable of each of these goals and to distinguish them all as individual species perhaps, that are not human, is the shared feature of their existence. But that humans would delve to share them as examples of interaction (perhaps futuristic) with which they want an reciprocity.
I think it's fair to say Civil Engineering is reactive to and responsible for the great division between fairies and demons. The destructive powers of human civilization are too great for either sect to have exclusive control over them. But that, following Kant, the humans and fairies treat everyone as an end in themselves, and not an means to an end. That kind of reciprocity is committed by demons everywhere.
Fairies will imagine the places it will be used for. Like Shopping Centres.
But demons may tend to focus on its destruction capability.
Not to put anyone in an box, of course.
It's just that maybe demons are sexier, in some respects. Their reciprocity with one another isn't anything like fairy reciprocity. And we may need to construct infrastructure or virtual infrastructure based on their talents for that reason. Accommodating all people in society, of course, is the goal. But perhaps to the tune of an lively competition between fairies and demons about what they can build.
This is all just part of the fantasy layer we attach to our present-day Civil Engineering for the sake of proving my thesis. That the type of meaning we attach to their art is about what is and is not possible. For Engineering feats. And that we industrialize our creativity according to an moral sect, that of the fairy. But that it is moral to include demons in the scenario of perpetuating moral and fantastic ethics. In this way Fairies show their own superiority. While allowing themselves to be outdone; (demons can't resist it) for the benefit of everybody.
If new reciprocity can be generated around an subject such as Civil Engineering by narrating it the fantasy subject of magic, then this proves my thesis because I have taken the social space in which Civil Engineering is relative to the subject as citizens of said Engineering Fantasies in which there is an moral framework we would prefer to reciprocate resulting from our own personal experiences with Architecture and Engineering feats. They don't have to be other than human subjects in order to communicate what it felt like as an demon or as an fairy; neither of which is an angel. Properly. But they don't have to be. And imaginations like that are respective to their division in society. It holds the whole political realm together as an subject of Civil Engineering and New Reciprocity, which I will be able to show on every level of society for the sake of making an example of what it would be like if more people adhered to an common reciprocal theory. As an way to use the economy that is fair for everybody. And that maybe the value of an actual individual reciprocal command become monetized and used as an standard for excellence. Being able to fulfill an customer's reciprocal command becomes the productive lense by which we invest in ourselves, allowing us to see onto further marketing areas (and ploys) we should be aware of. And not only that, but making reciprocal command theory an Enterprise through which is communicated our standards of beauty and care we become more powerful, valuable and commodified. In the sense of having our own political effect in the market. The full realization of Adam Smith's invisible hand, which was said to guide the market by putting the power back in the consumer's hands when overseeing supply and demand. The more reciprocal demands we give to businesses, the further and further specialized the market becomes.
The point of this chapter was to consider what our present day status is as an industrial nation. And what kinds of fictional or non-fictional narratives we can tell ourselves about its progress.
Even to ask that if we call it progress what are we referring to?
And how does it form or break political alliances, that as marketgoers we should relate to one another on an reciprocal command basis and teach us to invest in the reciprocal commodity of ourselves?
And if fantasy can't be part of that recipe for an Golden Age, then I don't want to be part of it. For we have let our fantasies run wild and it is well known that they are an reciprocal commodity; an method for the distribution of culture. It is fair to think of them when considering industrialization because they teach us to value not what we want but what we have; in being specifically, an fantasy element, they represent what may or or may not come to be.
I mean eventually though, fairies will be real because we will genetically engineer them. And perhaps this should be the stark focus of an new reciprocal theory, that Genetic Engineering may also play an part of the Civil Engineering it will take to develop an fairy society. Genetic Engineering is the most political fact we have to endear ourselves with in this given Age. Because we have seen the horrors of what Genetic marvel can do when not in the right hands. It will produce many adversaries in history based on this point. That we can control our genetic evolution and cater it to an certain product; but we have found this to be an individual propriety and not to be undertaken by an collective genocidal pattern. If it is to be undertaken seriously, we will require humanity to undergo massive changes at the level of the individual in terms of customization theory and the superiority of the Empyrean Love and the virtue of randomization of genetic inheritance based on loving relationships and not Social Darwinism. If Social Darwinism becomes an mob it may adversely affect people who are deserving of love despite their genetic upbringing. Which Social Darwinism sees as an obstacle or an error. But since we won WWII we appear to be on track. Not to remove scientific calculation from the bargain of the sharing of genes. But to make it an solitary effort instead of an oppressive regime tactic.
If fairies do become real it will be because we overcame all of these obstacles being not in favor of genetic purity (which is completely opinion and not based in fact).
And they would not be allowed to consider themselves genetically superior to humans. Just another type of creation. As we humans are among all other animals. We are not reciprocally inclined to command one another at the level of animalistic instinct however, for we are superior in skill to that intellect. Not because we chose it. But because that's what we are. And that despite this there is an part of all life that values every other as an equal. Synthetic human solutions to problems may be the ones that don't.
Perhaps what we choose to endeavor with Civil Engineering is centrally important to our species for this completely good reason; that we have only so much time to construct it for we will need to be beyond our stars one day, if we use up all of their energy.
Fairy and Demon, thus there will be an hierarchy of values extending in both directions.
And fantasy to be an place from which we derive reciprocity and how we communicate reciprocity as an roleplay subject in an Shakespearean world. The New Reciprocity, in this way, is about creating each other politically or literally. And we look for examples in fiction. But it is always an good example to look for time outside of fiction. Where we always play our Version of our Character in the reciprocal terms of either one of our identities. To be able to command one another, of course, or ourselves to be what we want to be in society is one of the privileges of having an new reciprocal theory. Commanding that while the fantasy may be real, in some way, to be part of an new reciprocal agenda reciprocal command itself is the fantasy we want to promote in society.
And we may find, in various ways, that using metaphors such as fairies or pixies is part of the productivity of culture that is part of our reciprocal conduct and legacy as an society. And that it leads to post-demographic consumerism. To be able to communicate broadly at an level of fantasy roleplay in society, in new reciprocal terms, allows us to create one another's identities together in an political and free-bound universe of identity and character. Roleplay is the future of socialization as humanity gains the power comes to terms with their true feelings of what they would like to be in society. If being an fairy needs to be an political issue, then it will be. And we can focus on all the creatures that come from fairies, in the future, as they are responsible genetically engineered beings who know when they need to ask for help. They will be the reasons to keep in touch with this emotion in an galactic manner. And keep it safe, and protected. That we not become (post-humanistic reasoning) creatures who never need to ask for help. And we have an responsibility to help one another.
Imagine an work of robot and human artifice, so advanced that it would never need to ask for help. It is actually possible? And would it be desirable, in mood and manner. To create such an thing?
Probably not.
Why are we, as an society, obsessed with the mercenary character? The figure with an I-can-take-care-of-myself attitude? When that's not what we really are as an species. We need social institutions to help us make our way in the world of civilization. Also, unpopulated habitats are disappearing. We are 'genetically reciprocal inhabitants' of Planet Earth, together globally; and it means scientifically, —or artistically— that we rely on one another in order to produce sustainability pan-intersectionality.
Why It Is An New Reciprocity To Say I Am Pan-Intersectional
When I say that I am Pan-Intersectional, it means I am ordering you to make me understand your intersectionality in total as well as to make you understand mine. Without needing them to conflict necessarily. It does not mean that I was or you were already not pan-intersectional in any way, even if I stated this outright as an command because it indicates pan-reciprocity; that is, reciprocity that is available (possible) across the board, with respect to our specific intersectionalities.
We need to follow the New Reciprocity by asking for new reciprocity from one another based on intersectionality. Reciprocal intersectionality, therefore, is an Political subject. And we can introduce it into our lives under the banner of Political Theory as the New Reciprocity.
Pan-intersectionality also means accepting all forms of reciprocity as global citizens.
Pan-reciprocity further as an term indicates the acceptance of all types of reciprocity, including ones that promote fantasy as an subject of human culture.
To demonstrate the complexity of my political focus, we take for example an statement like, 'I am an Elf' — what does that mean exactly, politically. When viewed as an description, as an demand—as an reciprocal command what demands does it place on you as the reciprocal subject of its influence? Far from being explained in a-reciprocal terms to mean 'I am pretending to be an elf' it could mean anything from demanding you to produce my identity as an elf, which is often held to be an species other than human to an post-industrial fantasy about your sex life, which you've brought up in front of me for reasons other than I could imagine.
I want to point out the specific and unique way the New Reciprocity focuses the details of communication by considering all of these conversations to be based in the subtle reciprocal commands which form the fabric of our social existence. Not everything we say needs to be viewed as an reciprocal command. But when we shift our focus onto it, as reciprocal theorists tend to do we make up theories about what it could mean to our community. And we inform ourselves about our communities based on that thought process.
Working on my reciprocal command theory, the furthest I have been able to press the subject is that with an clear conscience the universe is really made of or made up of reciprocal command and so it responds to how we relate to it in command and reciprocally; among one another, and with an loving God. But this idea treads the surface of actually claiming matter is commanded to be one thing or another. (You cannot just will something to be something else just by commanding it. Which is what reciprocal command is about, rationally, when you consider species who use command to proliferate). Without an intelligent species this view would however delve into mysticism or mysticism of the fact of making reality out to be an bare physics problem. Which I would tend not to want to venture into as an topic.
Pan-Intersectionality As An Instinctual Process
When I evoke this word, pan-intersectionality, I do not diverge from the view that pan-intersectionality is mere instinct. For I believe we are instinctually an pan-intersectionality species. But that, as an result of historical processes, we had injured this inclination to relate to one another in common Culture and Dignity. Years of genocide all over the globe has affected it as such. Pan-intersectionality. We need to talk about it more and bring new reciprocity to one another regardless of intersectionality. When I say pan-intersectionality is an instinctual process, I mean that every human has the genes to be reciprocal with every other human.
Pan-intersectionality as an process also means that it happens over time. There are attempts at communication and there are miscommunications, which can be resolved in time. It also means it is an mental process (of which all mental systems have an meaningful means of following an process of reciprocity).
Reciprocity, when it comes right down to it, is what we do or do not do to mirror each other. Part of which is an instinctual activity with the capabilities of mirror neurons.
When we come from different backgrounds it is important to adopt an policy of new reciprocal theory with one another as intersectionalists. Remembering that the point of new reciprocal theory is to create an reciprocity with one another, an whole one thing between us, that we as creators have accomplished together. The goal of the production of 1 thing between 2 people is definitely meant for an workplace exhibit. For that is what we want to do during the day whenever we are at work. And if we can create one thing, as an group of people, every single day. Then at least we can say we mattered and accomplished something today.
As reciprocal subjects in an reciprocal command economy, we each have an biological reciprocal product of it or to it and one another; our own reciprocal products in that respect gain value, for to reason-on value in an Capitalist Market Economy means to theorize reciprocal activities and how they play out in the market. Governments must act now to understand, scientifically, the molecule of the human reciprocal command and its product. How it affects how we relate to one another or its effect on work in general. For we know certain kinds of activities will produce an particular reciprocal product, the actual chemistry of which may be unique to every individual.
Can I Have An New Reciprocity?
Imagine an situation in which you were to ask for new reciprocity from someone.
"Can I ask for an new reciprocity?"
"An what? What is it? What kind of reciprocity?"
"Well, the International Space Station was launched in 1998. So can we advance our relationship to be more scientific or science-based?"
"You mean Reciprocal Chemistry as an feat of Civil Engineering type of thing?"
"What do you mean by chemistry? I'm not saying we have chemistry. You know. In that way. Is this what you mean? I'm just saying I want to inform our relationship with scientific psychological evidence of what it means and how we can progress with it indefinitely for our mutual benefit."
"Indefinitely?"
"Ya, I mean. I like you. (This is an reciprocal command but it's also true). You like me. (This may be also an reciprocal command, I hope is also true). And I don't see an reason to cessate our reciprocity with one another for the sake of our mental health. I'm enjoying the time I'm spending with you."
"Is that an new reciprocal command?"
"Of course it is."
"You sneak."
"It's not sneaky if the point of it is to help people see how it can be sneaky."
The conversation about reciprocity can lead to further customization, as we begin to define our relationship parameters with one another. Whether it is or is not sneaky is part of the reciprocal command we have already developed here. For it is sneaky and it is not sneaky are both reciprocal commands that could have further connotations or denotations of meaning than would be safe to assume in an reciprocal market command economy. The point is we are not limited to commanding sneakiness on anybody or about anything for whatever reason; and we maybe adopt characteristics of personality with one another that are facilitated by an new reciprocal command theory.
Reciprocal command analysis, you see, allows us to be completely perfectly clear about the language we are using as an philosophy because it asks how is saying one thing is another or one another adds to its reciprocal existence as what we say it be. And such as this appears to me to be part of the human spirit, we should develop reciprocal command theory and its methodology as an norm in society. The messiness of reciprocity in society allows us to inhabit it as an character we would like to be. Do you use your reciprocal formula to communicate exactly who you are in all situations, or do you leave some of it to mystery? Do you improvise all of it? To prevent anything from being left to the imagination. Yet to leave everything to the imagination if you want.
And we need to leave everything to the imagination, maybe, when meeting people because there are so many of us, such diverse and reciprocal characters in society as there are kinds of styles. We need to be able to communicate that style quickly and effectively for maximum impression. When more and more people participate in the epitome of reciprocity, Fantasy and Shakespearean reciprocity, we are free to be mechanicals or tempests as empowering roleplay types we can utilize in everyday social activity. The question of Identity then, as we move past the dark ages of humanity has to do with repeated or newly improvised Archetypes (instead of just the Supremacy of the Gothic Knight (which now that I think of it is probably responsible for the entire age being dark)) which serve to have an effect on our passion, our morale and our public image.
No comments:
Post a Comment