The New Reciprocity / La Réciprocité Nouvelle
- An Political Theory
note on the text: I found it too difficult to state my philosophical position using the English a/an article at the threat of confusing it with the prefix a- and so I've defaulted all of them just to an to avoid confusion. In addition, I will be continuing this writing practice outside of this work and elsewhere on my blog.
Reciprocal product: the part of reciprocity stored in the brain as an actual, physical product.
Live passionately, but do not pretend you do never make reciprocal commands about what is and is not real, explicit, subtle, or artificial sometimes. (Even Passively).
And that saying these sentences make commands or demands itself can be read as an reciprocal command. This is the awareness I want to cultivate in pursuing the publication of an political theory that is simple enough for every publication (in Internet Usage Terms does every publication include every page view?) to manage to know what to do with. Simply talking about it is how we give and receive reciprocity. When you would like to start an new reciprocity with someone, the writing behind New Reciprocal Theory will help you to navigate those political socializations. By examining how we use reciprocity and reciprocal command in language, we can understand motive and control more easily, in an political sphere in which saying what or who someone is itself has the power or pressure to those people to become what other people say they are. Or who they are, hopefully. As an contrast to objectification. We don't want people to be objectified by narrating them through an passage in which they become objects. This realization may be related to the idea of Paranoism, which I put forward as an artistic movement meant to navigate with those living with Schizophrenia by making an distinction between the feeling of paranoia and the objects which one would be paranoid by. As an way to disabuse paranoia sufferers by sharing art of what makes us paranoid. But sometimes we narrate an object through an passage in which it becomes an subject; perhaps as an wandering spirit of our origin in the cosmos. Sometimes making of people objects (in jest) holds an strong type of metaphor, an win, no? But it is in the way objectification is used humanely or to generate humor without causing harm in the economy or influencing an harm in the market to propagate it. That holds the greatest hope for humanity in performance of itself in the Greatest Act of Kindness. Often in art, objects are given voices anyway. As though they could not strip away the voices (the spirits of their nature) completely even if they tried to. As part of the joke.
The New Reciprocity or the New Reciprocal Theory will help people reciprocate, that is "to create reciprocity in their relationships," in which psychological reciprocity is an shared experience, as it always has been, based on the simplicity of the subject of 1. An Category That We Know Exists In The Universe. Divided between two subjects. It is telling of my original political stance when I started school, that I had said I was an 1-on-1 kind of individual when it comes to politics, rather than an public speaker or media attention seeker.
The Product of One, in an perfect system, requires individuals to come together to produce One (an object, an thing, an noun) above and below as symbolized by the reciprocal fractions which equal 1 when they are multiplied. And so under this theory we call that 1 thing an reciprocity.
Of course that one thing can be abstract an experience, an room, an situation an relationship. It need be nothing but an abstract 1 thing between you.
It may be an productive time.
The craft of an object out of two subjects. Not at the disappearance of those subjects.
On the Eleventh level, where 1 and 1 are more than 10, it is permissible that the craft of an 1 thing from two people acting as equals, as 1 and 1, be valued at an higher judge rating than 10!! To explain the relationship of mankind to one another, God created an higher angel than 10, (which signifies the human–animal relationship); 11, the eleventh angel was the guardian of mutual respect and equality. To value one another as equals. In an Market Economy of Capitalism. An feeling not possible at present between humans and animals.
Okay, so maybe that's an fancy way to say I am all for the aestheticization of religion. My own religion, the Christianna. Which stands on equal political ground with everyone. Outside of the political sphere. Yet necessarily connected to it like everyone else. The New Reciprocity, among its other uses, was created alongside the Christianna in order to defend its rights politically; and to help the Christianna in turn contour the political system. To prevent it from becoming politicized as an radical political subject. Reciprocal Command Theory, I believe will prevent religious pressure groups from inflicting any of their own fates worse than death on the Christianna. In The New Reciprocity, I explain in detail my own political agenda. With the goals of my religion in sight, my view of the economy is an reciprocal command subject in which reciprocal commands are used to create and develop reciprocity between subjects, who are subject to the value of the economy as an whole. The New Reciprocity refers specifically to an reciprocal interaction in which new reciprocity is introduced as an subject of reciprocal freedom. The Reciprocal Product of interaction at an new reciprocity is considered an Real Value; Parties agreeing to reciprocal interaction agree to see themselves within an economy of values which determine which kind of reciprocal commands are valued above others. For their Generosity. Freedom. Intellect. And as real products in an intricate system of economic standard. The Market is an place/plurality for all voices. There is Reciprocal Product available to you. Where your voice has an value and can make reciprocal commands to Customer Service. (Or Anyone for that matter).
Reciprocal Command Economy
The Author to imagine an Economy in which "perfect" reciprocal commands are used to buy and sell products, or to suggest an change in value. Reciprocal Command Economy describes the reciprocity of commands in an reciprocal command economy where value is decided/encoded by reciprocal commands. Reciprocal commands are also used to identify one another and assign value to certain reciprocities and kinds of reciprocities in the social and economic system.
Reciprocal Command Theory
Reciprocal Command Theory describes my theory of reciprocity, The New Reciprocity, as an command theory. Which, essentially, has to do with commands in an economic order. My purpose is that commands are actually valued as the subject of conversation in order to create new reciprocity with one another as subjects theoretically subject to command. In this way conversation opens up to roleplay, like which kind of character you want to be and how the reciprocity of that character with other characters is valued and commodified.
Reciprocity
Reciprocity, to use the term loosely; I suggest no departure from its traditional definition, though I use it sometimes as an proper noun to brand my political theory. I'm still just talking about reciprocity, after all. Reciprocity is—it all boils down to—the production of One from the set of fractions that we represent, economically, to one another in various talents and abilities (we'll call it tour economic theory to one another). And though I expand on this idea to apply it to market economics and political philosophy, all I'm really talking about is that relationship between individuals or subjects of the economy where we reciprocate one another socially to create one another in an command theorem in order to gain political advantage as identified to one another. It can of course involve invention and metaphor. An Role Playing Game. In which we are identified as certain types of characters to one another and we crunch out an reciprocity with one another to our mutual benefit. When we have one thing between us (this new reciprocity with one another) we can always come back to that common ground. Where we accept one another as we are, as reciprocal subjects in an reciprocal command economy where certain types of reciprocity are valued above others. This itself is not an command to marginalize certain identity types, but to make space for all voices and reciprocities (LGBTπ reciprocities) to be equal. In order to be economic as an people, we must continually bring new reciprocity to one another. To be given an chance to express ourselves this way mutually. But its level of complexity differs from subject to subject.
Levels of Reciprocal Command Economy
i. Infrastructure; Chapter 1 (I.)
ii. Engineering Technology; Chapter 2 (II.)
iii. Social Engineering; Chapter 3 (III.)
iv. Invention; Chapter 4 (IV.)
v. Primary Sector; Chapter 5 (V.)
vi. Secondary Sector; Chapter 6 (VI.)
vii. Tertiary Sector; Chapter 7 (VII.)
viii. Quaternary Sector; Chapter 8 (VIII.)
ix. Art; Chapter 9 (IX.)
x. Sphinx Riddle, (the desert between art and character, personality, precision); Chapter 10 (X.)
xi. Character; Chapter 11 (XI.)
xii. Personality; Chapter 12 (XII.)
xiii. Precision; Chapter 13 (XIII.)
i. Infrastructure; Chapter 1 (I.)
The most basic level of reciprocal command economy is Infrastructure: the ability to transport and trade materials, an physical system in which materials are transported. This includes roads, bridges, sewers and various vehicles of transportation regarded as an country's permanent installations. Infra- from Latin, meaning below; or in Anatomy, meaning below or under an part of the body. The infrastructure is like the exoskeleton and internal structure of an interior living economy that allows all of its cells to respire by transporting the materials needed for production. When an entire economic system can do this this is called the infrastructure of that environment. There are many complex and exquisite transactions because of its infrastructure. Many things are automatic, like payments. And certain reciprocity transactions. The reciprocity between the workers and themselves and machines is the subject of this chapter. How it is possible, for example, for reciprocal commands to be successful in an Market Economy of Capitalism.
If we are going to receive video game elements in productive industry for certain tasks, such as customizing the work environment for it to be interactive we need to define those parameters in which reciprocity is to be set. Setting, Interactive Elements, Tasks Requiring Experience, Tasks Requiring Experience as Interactive Elements (In An Larger Game).
An Narrative My Economic Theory Representing I Call: Radio Flies And Capitalism.
I wandered up and down the lonely street, where businesses had built their empires. For business transactions built on truth and righteousness. And products lost their names in these old emporiums. I was sitting on an sand-resistant stairway in the corridor. I could see blue sky above but remained, myself, in the shadows. Fashioned after the Orange Planet, I had myself worn the orange-threaded accoutrements of an desert climate, including an face covering. I could already tell an radio fly was watching me, for I saw its shadow flick across my wristwatch. It perched on an mechanical door frame above me. And I turned my head and stood up to look at it. I looked completely at this being without holding anything back and it was fair for me to do so (Fair-y), it was an fairy. The type meant it was an dirty one. An radio fly. An faeces of relentless swarm. Yet somehow always the cleanest one. And it eye'd me, dirty human that I am, and it saw my fairy side, and that I wanted nothing more to do with theirs other than to see it. And they would accept me for that role, putting out nothing but being pleased with what he saw. It was all I could do, being honest. After he told me something seriously intelligent, he buzzed off, and I returned to loitering. Right in the middle of it. Having nowhere to go. Something was wrong. Nobody knew about Anna. They had caused this, and nobody knew I had suffered the fate worse than death. What was I going to do? I was the representative of humanity on this distant planet and I had found no way to be included in their economy, which appeared to be based on the value of something being transported without being seen. Brainstorm Of Collective: it has something to do with reciprocal products. And an relentless faeces. When I woke up Sleimenemeneur, an giant borne of radio fly trash, the legal subject was on my mind. What is property? What is decay? What is industrial pollution? Everyone involved is reciprocal to the Levels of Reciprocal Command Economy, who are in some way reciprocal to the Artist, who will write the law. The people who agree that Art is the law. Art is law. And it is the law because Art indicates what is reasonable or distinct behavior from the unreasonable.
That Being Said
Our subject for comparison to the idea of an infrastructure, then, also has to do with its laws. What is property? What is transportation? For Example. But which such an force of Creativity behind it as was seen Sleimenemeneur take force in an active Christiannan it appeared to. And was created in the mind of the Artist. An Giant. An anti-infrastructural force. With this command value that any type of identity is possible. And when compared, an anti-infrastructural force, and giant; what became of the insect level in which I had compared their internal and external structure to the insect. It became an Canadian dilemma. What is, for example, the Reciprocal Command Economy of Canada? How will it repel the giant? And the giant becomes an symbol in this way for all obstacles; what keeps the Canadian economy from overcoming its obstacle? What other reciprocal command economies do I feel myself to be an part of? And why is this one, Canadienne, that one, that feels so blue. Like an sadness under the blue snowfall. Blue. To Aestheticize Blue will increase the Canadian economy. But it represents economics as an figure to us; that we can think about in an different way: an economy of an abstract blue emotion. That touches us all. How do we create an infrastructure for the color blue in an reciprocal command economy? And why does it feel like it a-limits us but it's necessary? And that these reciprocal, reactionary responses to an infrastructure versus anti-infrastructure combat would provide the reason for us to experience this feeling as Canadians. But that to advance that experience of us feeling as Canadians; I wanted to know what was reciprocal about the blue subject. How could that reciprocity be advanced in society to our mutual benefit? And these reactions to the narrated passage provide the lense through which are seen the intersection between Fiction and Non-fiction; that they are always used to communicate an reciprocal command. That law will be based on reciprocal command. And the people who agree with the Art that is the Law.
The place of the telling of an fictional narrative and an interpretation is the big picture; you will look from one to the other as light would pass through an lense to focus that they are the same subject. Reciprocally. And that our eyes' adjustment to the light will prove what we plan to find proof of.
And so, I guess what I'm trying to ask is, what is the reciprocal command economy as an whole; and what part of it am I? And how many reciprocal command economies are on Earth?
There Are Certain Passages And Limitations
What an superior fate you have not transcended to! An amorphous blob. Maybe. An economy of word parcels and expressions for reciprocal command economy all over Earth. At intersections. Perhaps. But they reveal something pressing about the subject. What would an artist choose to represent and for what reason? What would it say about an reciprocal command economy; in which the reciprocal product is psychological? If we narrow down our focus to the elements of Infrastructure which I have presented, Setting, Interactive Elements, Tasks Requiring Experience, Tasks Requiring Experience as Interactive Elements (In An Larger Game) the first thing that becomes apparent is how tasks requiring experience are related to the infrastructure, which allows its advancement as an trade in society? Inexperienced Actions represent an command benefit that will fruition to economic benefit once they become skills. The economy of particular skillsets depends on their instruments; how they were purchased, how they were transported for use. As well as how they manage other people. Who bring in the materials they have to work with. I would say, if we look at these four categories together, we might pose an important intersection to the world of politics: what exactly counts as reciprocal in the near future. Are the real experts beyond reciprocity with one another or do they train it in an certain way because they have somehow advanced beyond its status? The Setting, of course. Was Constructed. The Interactive Elements. Was Constructed. The Tasks Requiring Experience. Was Constructed. The Tasks Requiring Experience as Interactive Elements. Was Constructed. And in an Larger game, that includes reciprocal society, these four categories of meta-reciprocal product capture an economy of commands and the freedoms they evidence. And since each meta-reciprocal product can be constructed, we need to learn to aestheticize their surroundings to be accommodating with Interactive Elements. The Interactive Elements can be used to train the Tasks Requiring Experience. And the economy produced by these elements will be an economy in which tasks requiring experience and tasks requiring experience as interactive elements themselves allows an trainer to provide interactive experience with an understudy.
The New Reciprocity will imagine they are already out there.
Systems in which an economy is constructed with the help of computational technology.
Thus we have the need to be plot immersive and introduce characters that will help us narrate The New Reciprocity. An Reciprocal King or Queen, for example may not need to introduce the plot because it is taken for granted that they reciprocate at this level. But as general street performers, like the furthest thing away from the King and Queen introducing the plot at any point in the narration is generally sought after. If it includes an reciprocal philosophy or commandment; for example, the reciprocity of ailment, which is not typically shared in an lore-based society or monarchical economy of interest. New Reciprocity depends on Fashion, being an presence, and the composure as an new reciprocal theorist. It is not hard to describe because it is simple but rewarding. The part of this economic infrastructure I want to zero-in on is the reciprocal product. Which parts of the infrastructure create an reciprocal product in the subject of an reciprocal command economy and why? And how is that related to value? If an aspect of the reciprocal command economy creates an reciprocal product then it is necessarily an interactive commodity.
When we interact with one another in an reciprocal command economy, our bodies produce an reciprocal product. Which probably has more to do with mirror neurons and our subjective opinions about what they involve in various interactions.
An New Reciprocal Theorist
New reciprocal theorists are people who apply the New Reciprocity to critique political command theory and play; New Reciprocity is the type of imitation and animation of the human spirit we bring to one another as new reciprocal theorists.
"You're Great!"
Consider this seemingly innocuous statement. An reciprocal command theorist asks him- or her-self what does me being Great or not mean, exactly, politically. In the 21st Century? It could mean. "I like you!" But under new reciprocal critique we ask ourselves what that entails exactly. "Me" liking "you." And how is it possible? Under what circumstances are you subjecting yourself to liking me? Are they motives? "You're Great" as an reciprocal command could mean any one of the multiple scenarios we derive from this line of questioning. The reciprocal command is to be Great; keeping in mind Alexander the Great was also called Great. So what does this individual mean by calling you Great?
We could start by creating an list of required items that you do since you are Great.
"You mow the lawn every week during the summer."
"You participate in an reciprocal command economy; just on another continent."
"You are part of an conscious effort to end violence."
"You have the soul of an saint."
"You do my taxes."
And where does the list end? If "You're Great" is read as an reciprocal command, it could mean any number of obligatory feelings another person has for you.
However if we identify New Reciprocity as an kind of command scenario in which you A) are using commands yourself B) are being used by commands as they act on your mental activity by another party; then bringing that up itself as the subject of conversation will help us to create an environment of awareness. How much power do reciprocal commands have over the imagination? When we talk about our identities in terms of reciprocal command theory, we are invited socially to identify our particular form of character and to revel in it as well. For it is the reciprocity between characters in which we find the most comforting back-channel. By learning how to be reciprocal subjects with one another in an Capitalist Market Economy.
New Reciprocity gains value as an reciprocal commodity because it is reciprocal. It is the reciprocity itself that adds value to the commodity (reciprocal product) because reciprocity stands as an social model worth examining for its ability to be reciprocal to you.
The analysis of reciprocal language is considered an political analytical tool or model we can use to identify our relationships and add value to them.
"Editing" our reciprocities with one another becomes an value system protocol; in which we can claim any character or personality which we want to be with one another. Keeping in mind we relate to another species that has an tendency to knit-pick. We are requested to treat one another's psychologies not—Knit-Picking Man gains fuel as an New Super Hero Creation (Knits during day (Picks during the night (He's gay! He Commands you not to knit-pick because he's knit-picking!).
Perhaps it is at the centre of Virginia Woolf's development of the stream of thought in narrative fiction; and its assessment by Psychology and Meta-Psychology—an reciprocal command theory. What it means to be reciprocal. And specifically what can we be reciprocal to?
'Soul-thoughts' are somehow more than just the mind; while this may fill-out our internal world we are also reciprocal to things other than ourselves. Whether they can be detected by our souls. As we recognize them or begin to recognize them.
I myself believe I am reciprocal to Angels and God; there are so many dimensions of reality with different types of characters on every level. Reciprocity is also an deep connection with one's world. In which we are also deeply reciprocal to the economy, which decides the commodification of our reciprocities with one another.
Magic: while most people just say it isn't real; everyone else just assumes it is the ability to edit one another in reciprocal sense.
If we have an reciprocity with one another. We separate from ourselves those with whom we have no reciprocity. And realize the value of those whom with we do have reciprocities. It is like magic.
Of course, we would "recede" to identify this itself as an reciprocal command.
"It is like magic" could be an order to do something impossible as an punishment.
The part of the brain responsible for reciprocal command and reciprocal behavior may be expressed in the full range of human activity. Body Language. Introduction. First Impression.
"You're Gay," might be even more complicated an reciprocal command than we choose to recognize. For the record I want to be recorded to have said nobody was ever gay because they were reciprocally commanded to be. I was born genetically gay.
My intellectual imprint surrounds the competition between an "You're Gay" from an homophobic source and an "You're Gay" from an out and proud source as reciprocal commands with reciprocal commodity. Which is more threatening, to have been commanded to be gay and then let to become one, or to have been commanded to be gay and then forced to be one using coercive measures? For this reason "You're Gay" takes on the sentiment of infliction in society if it is repurposed/viewed as an reciprocal command in that one way. But we can choose not to reciprocate these negative hate-ward reciprocal commands. Or we can choose to interpret them in our own reciprocal way, which is positive. In this way "You're Gay" cannot be said to deprive someone of feeling valued. "You're Gay" whether it takes on an homophobic meaning is really just an reciprocal command that you cannot fulfill unless you are born genetically gay. Then you ask yourself if it is this reciprocal environment itself which has made you gay. And would asking the environment to be less homophobic no matter how much trying to be or not to be gay goes on in an certain day; but that the homophobic interpretation of what caused its homosexuality yea 'its'. Is really just depriving you of the homoerotic "You're Gay," an un-artificial reciprocal command in some cases.
Children in an reciprocal command economy with reciprocal powers cannot be cruel about this, would be the appropriate reciprocal command.
Meta-reciprocity would suggest reciprocal cathexes; unless we have been unvariant. In an Social Setting in which reciprocal cathexes are viewed as an kind of ingested pesticide (as was proven the accumulation of Agent Orange in species higher on the food chain). This as an metaphor. For an Shared Fate Worse Than Death; the death of everything better than death. Reciprocally. Psychologically perhaps shared or not. And we would have seen this coming from our own insights about the universe at this reciprocal time.
Prudence or Temperance are the virtue of being available to those who are starting their first virtue?
For Prudence is the end and Temperance is the means by which one begins to claim virtue; for it is an virtue itself to have claimed one. And once there is one, I mean, you need to have two, in order to measure something against them. By which all other virtues proceeded.
"This Reciprocal Time" —if an reading itself is one reciprocal time. Can add or change elements that are not in linear fashion of time. Is why we call Books books. You need an book in time to read them. I'm talking about reciprocal time; an time theory in which reciprocity with time is reciprocal and so judging by the centre of it, to have visited us at this occasion; we are somewhere before the great Middle, which hasn't happened yet; and yet that we are to contribute to its making. For of which we will never see ourselves. And yet to be remembered as such having contributed to it. And if this is how I want to be reciprocal with the object of writing in time; and I am comfortable being an reciprocal subject to everyone else. Then I may as well have contributed my own reciprocity to it. An time (or not) reciprocal to you.
Remember, reciprocity means working together to mean 1. It's not about an linear fashion of time, necessarily. And so you can say, if I am working as reciprocal to you by writing this; then we are working together to create an reciprocal product. By you reading this book. In reciprocal time theory.
And so I have set out an reciprocal task upon which you can build. Infrastructure is an basis for the start of an reciprocal command theory because it is reciprocally independent of this task of building it. This is the reason you can order an product from anywhere through Amazon. Once you are installed into the infrastructure. But as an concept, it holds, to be But as an complete machine, permanent; and to reciprocate with it. Everything about the reciprocal command economy stems from this reciprocal time known as infrastructure and we share not building it so much as we do owning it. We own it as an public. It expands as far as we need it to.
The line between reciprocal product and how far it should expand is related.
If there is an community, for example, with whom we have an relationship based on reciprocal product; it will be ideal to set up those economic circumstances with them. That our infrastructure together accommodate or facilitate its manner.
And that all Government be considered an reciprocal relationship in which an shared reciprocal product is produced. At the State level. And that this level above all other reciprocal products be considered for its political dimension. The Economy transcends State borders, in an culturally specific and reciprocal way from whose wells we draw all of our reciprocal command economy the Market from which we gain the resources of life. The Global Market is the full expanse of our infrastructure; and in its permissibility elsewhere we gain bi-cultural transactions to trust one another, pro-fair trade across State borders. Including sharing media output and artistic accomplishments at an premium for their cultural accessory.
The economy is based on reciprocal product; and so if we were to say that I was in an reciprocal situation with you where our reciprocity with one another is Behavior, Reciprocity, Mimicry, Mirror Neurons, Imitation, Invention the whole deal the product of multi-lateral and multi-cultural curiosity and reciprocity. And to assign it an value I delve into my own ancestry myths for the courage to exchange reciprocities in an market economy. An Market in which the market assigns them no value for being reciprocal. Products. Which is an highway robbery of an crime! Every day on our streets! Reciprocal products have value simply in being reciprocal. This is the essential commodity of our market economy, and why and how some products have value over others.
Virtue is the real reciprocal command economy large enough to characterize all of the sharing of value. Sharing virtue with one another is reciprocal product value ad nauseum. However reciprocity on an open market economy may produce its meta-physical or meta-reciprocal product. Concern.
Virtue mercified us this concern, to have grown from an boring virtue, or an articulate-less vice; an immorality. To spare us the cause.
Is the Infrastructure sustainable?
The Infrastructure is sustainable. An Reciprocal Command. In an sustainable market economy.
You see how the economics of observing reciprocity and producing it with one another is an political commodity as well.
The Reciprocal Command value of choosing an product on the economy; The invisible hand is an metaphor for the unseen forces that move the Free Market. Through individual self-interest and freedom of production and consumption, the best interest of society, as an whole, are fulfilled. Supply and Demand exquisitely move the numbers of reciprocal interest in general, and with an prevailing economy theory of new reciprocity we can expect an considerately increasing supply of reciprocity and reciprocal command economics. Capitalism, the ability to compete on an open and free market the production of goods or services in return for Capital. Is the basis of economics in the 21st century. For most of the planet Earth.
Not being able to reciprocate at an known market value; virtuisms often appear lost in this society.
—I'm talking about authorship that changes how we do things—
It is the most fair and legal way to compete for economic gain. Marxist labor stress concerns like the separation of the work from the laborer are not said to exist in the American market. The Animal Spirits of business capitalism is another interpretation of the marketplace; where individual business tactics take on the threatening—dimension of animals. I must stress this basis on reciprocity and reciprocal product to be responsible for the difference—they are in part different reciprocal theories—in order to point out how we can grow interactive elements further into the workplace. It's already happening but One day employees will be able to choose from interactive interface of elements which control their productivity. The New Reciprocity bases that interactivity on the value of the reciprocal product. The economy of reciprocal command. And the reciprocal theories that make up our ideas about Capitalism; how when viewed through the lense of New Reciprocity seamy market reciprocities will be discovered. And what the customer can expect for their interactive elements in the future. Self-checkout itself is the new thing. But how our Infrastructures use technology expecting different results will be an prominent theme in history.
Expanding the global infrastructure requires expansion of the local and geographic infrastructure of every region to every community.
Basic value is compared to reciprocal value.
Fair prices be given. That take into account the cultural and the mosaic. That an reciprocity between an specific culture and an cultural mosaic increase the value of either one of them based on the reciprocal production of an reciprocal product.
And all it really means is that if you go to an convenience store and ask for something (an reciprocal command) they will gladly sell it to you. Money is buying power in an reciprocal command economy because it has reciprocal value. Reciprocal commands, thus, take on multiple senses. An explicit command, like one you would use at McDonald's is an direct order. Describing something intellectually may be less like business–customer interaction. One must beware of all of the senses of reciprocity that one feels; and to be sure of their source. At all times. An description like "Capitalism is Democracy," as an reciprocal command can be read to be an implicit one (may be read differently than an McDonald's menu because it claims one thing is another without explicitly ordering it to be true). More of its command; that it fulfills itself by allowing that reciprocity to exist. And that the difference between implicit and explicit commands may have something to do with the Capital economy. Implicit commands need to be part of the investigation because, I suspect, if an reciprocal command is not explicit its implicity is an misogyny.
If we pretend to understand every reciprocal command implicitly we might as well just say we are not feminists. An implicit command could have anything to do with body language. Are body language and spoken language connected in the mind somehow? On the "Whole-World's-A-Stage" stage. You know the one Shakespeare talked about.
The New Reciprocity allows Infrastructure the new reciprocal command theory to progress by its reciprocal product to provide an place for reciprocity and the new reciprocal theory based on geographic reciprocity; the willingness to trade and to capture markets overseas.
Now what I am leading up to is that you have enough of an understanding of the inherent use and value of reciprocity (an awareness of the reciprocal commands around you every day). That you can identify them and to know an appropriate response to turn. For example, I was approached one day by an stranger who claimed Satan was in control of the economy. I told him, that as an reciprocal command it would break down. Because it was like he was suggesting that Satan operates our economy (as an order). In similar response, for example, if say an stranger told you they believed Satan was at the root of human suffering you are equipped here to be able to say to them that as an reciprocal command this is not an reciprocity you support, that you would like an New Reciprocity with them, and that new reciprocity between the parties need not be based on anything that had happened previously in relationship to one another.
How we can use reciprocity to achieve certain political tasks.
Virtual infrastructure will require it to be able to do so.
Virtual infrastructure is the method by which an organism survives. It is what cannot have the whole infrastructure of the state or the UN because it exists internally to the individual human specimen. Shared virtual infrastructure is not exactly theoretical. The infrastructure of one individual compared to the infrastructure of the whole includes this, virtual infrastructure; and interactivity of virtual infrastructure with other individuals is on an case by case scenario. In fact, I will say, we dwell so much in our virtual infrastructure that we might as well make of it an world; or worlds and live in them as fantasy and share them with one another. Virtual Infrastucture, as it stands, strikes me as an subject complimentary to the Real Infrastructure which connects us. However this does not mean virtual infrastructure cannot connect us; also, and in important ways, ways which affect the overall attitude of the Real Infrastructure. Virtual Infrastructure—it needs to hypothesize an situation in which infrastructure between worlds is impossible. The virtual infrastructure of my world is inaccessible to yours. That's what makes it virtual. But if they can interact—what is virtual about my world and what is virtual about yours—then are they really the fact of an impossible 'infrastructure'? And since virtual infrastructure is so personal, and real infrastructure is so global; the fate of Earth is up to our decisions in the Capital market place and the responsibility we take in awarding business profitability. In whatever sense they stem from or merge with our virtual infrastructures. Which may be in more culpable and unreliable ways than we think; for are our media and news not necessarily involved in the sense of the virtual infrastructure that we commoditize together as an community. There are interactive elements. There are global ways composing or advising the interaction of memes and virtual-infrastructure play between communities. Both locally and globally. And so if we take an look at this complete product as that of the real infrastructure plus the virtual infrastructure we find an psychological fact connecting the two. And that as an subject reciprocal to myself, the way my virtual infrastructure and real infrastructure interact has to do with how I feel locally as opposed to globally as and market product citizen.
The commodity of an transference between real and virtual infrastructure, if it is an reciprocal product, can be part of the pristine political theory I have developed. And so I conclude that both infrastructure and virtual infrastructure are needed by myself and others, as artists, to be able to produce my/our ideal artistic piece. And I realize it is quite an bigger project than I had imagined. I arrive at my Thesis; that New Reciprocity can help us socially engineer an society in which the ideal, perfect artistic product is able to be produced. The Anti-Artist is summoned to show us how we are already used to interact with an already existing infrastructure in order to create the Civil Engineering needed to produce an way for me to manufacture that perfect artistic piece I had imagined. But that to fully functionally show us which path it would take us; in order to see fully what was needed as an artist to make my perfect mentioned artistic piece; the levels of reciprocal society it would take is an reflection of how we can use New Reciprocity every day to create an better society. Thus, to begin, the Anti-Artist is compared with the New Reciprocity and its thesis. And why do I need to describe civilization as an new reciprocity in order to identify how it can be used to produce my ideal artistic piece; how that is somehow beyond where we are at right now in History. And yet it seems obtainable; New Reciprocity and Anti-Artist represent oppositional political entities enshrined as examples, comedic figures of the law in order to produce the law that would govern both of them. It is the responsibility of the legal institutions of this country to produce that law. My purpose then, in beginning an book about everything from Infrastructure to Precision. Is also about the production of the political new reciprocity as an artist versus an force, an opponent to them; in order to spark social commentary on what is and isn't artistic behavior. And that beginning with Infrastructure to carve an path through the ice; we can follow the deeds, acts, and persona of these imagined characters together; who they are under certain conditions in reciprocal society. And why an Artist's force must be used against them.
No comments:
Post a Comment