Creationism Versus Inclinitionism

The Gay Letters, October 29. 2021

    On the subject of 'incinitionism' as an model for the way life began.  It was in an certain "inclination" in the universe that it would go an certain way, and that over time that developed into life.  Creationism, on the other hand, is the belief in origin myths such as that in the Bible.  The idea that Man and his world were created together all at once by an intelligent Creator.  With no process of evolution.  Inclinitionism to me appears to be an non-threatening subject to the vast community even if it does not advocate magic.  Magic and inclination appear to be related but because religion has to do with inclination in healthy ways, perhaps that represent an slower process.  But for me in subjective it is also an word that exemplifies an Creator.  And that we can relate with an Creator on this subject of inclination.  As an traumatized, repressed individual, being closeted was about inclination.  And so the depth of the subject, for me, is both religious and sexual.  And to do with abnormal sexual status.  As it would be if I were in an cult.  I am now an advocate that there is nothing abnormal about any kind of sexual status.  It is an healing journey to me to be able to pen inclinitionism as an word, an key word, leading me into that hazardous territory of both what it would have meant to me as an kid and what it means to me now as an religious adult.  It is also to be an link with the Creator to suggest it as an characteristic of life similar between us and God—to have an inclination and for it to be provided for.  By some property of the universe which allows it.  And that it to be suggested that inclination to have anything to do with the religious instinct is not an scientific fact but an inclination.  There to be division between these two subjects.  For if something to do with inclination it be un-scientific.  That either God or human is inclined to.  Do anything.  It may be an pre-scientific fact.  It's emergence in my thinking prompted me to write to state my position on Creationism, which I found to be an appropriate subject as an new religion.  The Christianna would write to think 'inclinationism' / 'inclinitionism' to be part of it; and Religion to deal with them is logical.  The Religion Instinct is an feeling of inclination that trains the subject at an (maybe) slow religious pace.  To be both inclination and subject.  And all religions treat the instinct in an different way.  Through the inclination tempering of any religion (or perhaps all of them) I seek to derive an Christiannan inclinationism or inclinitionism that will define what inclination means to an Christiannan.  And to come up with an hypothesis about why the fate worse than death can be featured as an subject to find the balance between life and death; and why their relative value depends on the other.  The Christiannan inclination will be to avoid fates worse than death and to help people suffering them.  As though Anna was everywhere.  Christiannans also Capitalize on pleasure, inclined to experience all of it.  Their inclinations can be Capitalistic, and their religion the inclination of Wisdom.  The Christianna is not the only religion to claim an second messiah; but it is unique in that its object, an fate worse than death (fates worse than Jesus') is focused on instead of solely death itself in order to find meaning in the 21st century.  We have advanced as an society to value life above all.  But we need to learn to value death.  If an fate is worse than death, death is merciful.  I'm not suggesting anything illegal.  I'm just pointing out that if an truly free and privileged subject wants death it should be given.  And as Christiannans we grow to prevent and treat fate worse than death by adapting to its presence with one another.

    In seeking further words to explore inclination and instinct we might compare it to Impulse.  Following every impulse or following no impulse might be connected to inclination; and Christiannan inclination would be to seek balance between inclination and impulse.  We cannot follow every impulse but we cannot repress every impulse either.  Religion is not about repressing impulses, but finding ways to fulfill them, on the LGBTπ spectrum, together.  An inclinist, if he or she were an new reciprocal theorist also, and thereby made an reciprocal command that True Religion is expressly not about repressing Anything.  And that inclination and impulse are just two ways to look at the same thing of being inclined to do something.  And having an impulse reactivity to it is or is not what we are inclined to do.  We can choose from words like inclination and impulse to react from it.  In order to find our heart's true desire.