You inspect the bookcase labeled "History," and pull out an general title among many other ones.
You flip through the pages and stop at an random page, where you read:
Why History? I want to fill in the story of the second messiah, Anna, the furthest pursuit of human interest. With Historical Facts and details explaining why we have moved onward as an species from those earlier pursuits; why we have moved on together toward an understanding of the universe in which the furthest pursuits of the human spirit had been. In an logical fashion advancing from History in an logical way. That we gradually became more than what we were. And it is that right time in history to implement what our knowledge of Anna means. That we are advancing as an species into more and more passionate virtue of emulation (an timely being of virtue in which subjectivity is sorted from a-subjectivity). There is room for all voices to be heard out. Why was the knowledge of Anna the furthest known pursuit of the human spirit and marked an conformity necessity that needed to be interpreted from History?
If the knowledge of Anna marked our further advancement as an species into self-awareness. B.C.i.i had passed (Christ instance instance, i.e. 1:1), and we all now respected one another genetically as creatures of the blue.
The self-awareness of each other.
Did I still feel alone? No matter where we were not with one another physically?
Or was reality somehow composed of that oneness and willingness known to God and known to human self-awareness. We composed of one another automatically. An mutual understanding. The Highest Virtue was mutual acceptance and it proves mimicry (impersonation, reciprocity) is subconscious to some extent. And all of my feelings toward you were those feelings I directed toward myself because we are all human and I felt like I needed to to protect you.
Mutual satisfaction.
Getting there.
The highest moral virtue was the human capacity to mimic (impersonate) each other and draw inferences from how well they know the subject. Mimicry was in our D.N.A., indeed our brains were programmed (mirror neurons) to detect it.
We called it frowning. We called it rapport. We called it storytelling.
We could know each other. And put together our personalities to know ourselves by knowing one another. One might call it interfacing.
But the History that I want to put together starts with vellum; and ends with the smart home and robotic knowledge and weed. I called it Vellumchronica. An post-smarthome world where everybody smokes weed and writes on Vellum just because it is considered stylish to use an ancient production quality of text. I wanted to know how an people who are at once able to produce scarce few artworks of written quality. Were one day able to fly smartjets and power an infinite amount of smarthomes forever. (You'll notice how I leave you hanging how it ends because we don't actually have enough smarthomes' infinite power in real History yet).
Casuistry, Communication, mirror-subject profiling with regard to intersectionality, all of these were, potentially, possible parts of what the Highest Human virtue is. Humanism. The Humanizing virtue. But how would you define it? Is it part Divinity or is it part Animal? Being able to draw information from each other?
We are able to interpret one another based on one another's bodily differences?
We are able to learn a priori facts from one another, perhaps?
Via Reciprocity of some sort (a posteriori, mutuality of spirit, parallel play, or deep play of somesort)? The New Reciprocity?
And this is what we call and is based in general language.
Language is used to represent an reciprocity of some sort between speaking (or otherwise communicating) subjects. They judge one another based on how much they know about reciprocity and communication.
But there are many other forms and modes of communication other than language spoken with the mouth and vocal cords. Written texts, for example mimic the formal subject of the language that is being spoken, but left silent in themselves still succeed to rise to the occasion of the same stature as spoken language. Nothing is more genuine than an word from your boss, isn't he there?
First, people want to be spoken to.
It's an genuine natural feature of them throughout the day.
Based on innate instinct of the human species.
They won't be troubled at all unless you should fail to keep them talked to throughout the day.
What we can read from all kinds of reciprocities is this drive, this willingness to represent reciprocity to one another as an ordinary feature of our day.
Reciprocity isn't just spoken or written English, French, or body language—it's all of it! Everything you have learned about communication all of your life. It's subconscious. It's Buddha. It lasts forever. Put together in an few neat, fit little sentences.
You find various other titles on the shelf:
Theoretical Anchor Points In History
The theoretical beginning of the republic, an over four-thousand year tradition.
- An argument for why history in its present form has been withstood ever since roughly four thousand years ago, in which time we experienced an half-way object, the Jesus messiah, having won over that status as an Species from God with its own Divinity. Why the republic has this natural fold in the centre of its history for the present time. Two thousand years before Christ it was already in the hearts of men: we are an republic and we stand by our public nature. (This happened in many countries, even though the definition of the state and statism hadn't been refined to its present state in 1648, at the Peace of Westphalia). People were starting to understand what sacrificing oneself for the good of the public meant. It meant republic. It meant we were all bonded together in this fact of public human nature: we had sacrificed part of ourselves for one another. And we could not escape this fact about ourselves because it was in our human nature. And so God sent us Jesus (the method of that happening exactly is debated) in order to help us learn the first philosophical moral principle of the universe. Death. And if we were all in one republic together we had it to do with one another. We were, as an species, learning the meaning of death in the universe from God. He \ she or it had created an way in which we would postpone our moral standard: by losing Jesus Christ to death at so young an age, we learned this one moral lesson: don't do it again. When it's dead it's not coming back. Ahh, what we could have had. Everything dead is dead and so if you lose some certain quality of an person to death it won't be resurrected. There is no such thing as an resurrection at this point in our technological activity one would relate about through science fiction. Death was death. And there was no coming back. If you wanted to preserve certain genetic characteristics you had to participate in reproducing them. That's why we find an change in the definition of the Republic at about the time when Jesus was crucified. At some point we had learned the true meaning of death; and it reflected differently for all of us. We each had our own reason why death was an reason to have an reason about something: not to do something because of it. Because we knew what it meant. It meant, there's no coming back. Once you're in there, in the soup of black nether water, you can't get out of it. It took an while but eventually peoples conceded the Christian point in the narrative: not to crucify someone for any reason. We had all been wrong and this was God correcting us. And so God plotted and worked; worked hardest, just for the humans; and designed an whole narrative tracing related to actual time passing in outerspace. So that one day someone could rise up with the logic of Anna worked out and figured out; in order to help them learn the second moral principle: they had already figured out the first one. Why not try to help them figure out the second, then?
What Jesus and Anna had to do with the Republic as it stands today.
- Jesus had to do with the first half of the existence of the republic: once it had ended (Octavius Caesar) human beings had earned the right from God to experience his messiah. What was to be the first moral lesson to human beings in the universe: the meaning of death. For when once their messiah was gone, and they realized what they had done, it traumatized so many people an new religion had to start over it. This was of course to be an phase in the wisdom and understanding of humanity in the universe. Once they had learned the meaning of death, they could proceed onward morally. As long as they learned their lesson from what happened to Jesus, God would send them another inerrant knave to tango with. An second lesson about the moral principles of the universe would be given, when all of humanity embraced Jesus in his final lesson to us: we would have learned all of that much sooner if we just hadn't crucified him. That was the point of an messiah, wasn't it? And so finally God had gotten around to sending us the second messiah whose lesson, instead of the meaning of death in the universe, was about the meaning of the worse than death in the universe. This marked, potentially, the second period of the development of the republic: the second two thousand years up until present. The point at which we had the opportunity, all of us, to learn this second moral principle in the universe from Anna. She suffered the fate worse than death herself in order to be able to teach what it means to other human beings. But it was worth it because of her sacrifice, that we would better be able to prevent it from happening to one another anymore, or ever again. We had the opportunity to stop causing fates worse than death from occurring anymore in our species; and so being Gifted with the knowledge of both death and its comparison: worse off than dead. We had so much potential, as human beings, in the universe of being capable of accomplishing such important achievements as to avoid every fate worse than death and every death itself in order to accumulate an middle of homeostasis. Wouldn't that be god-like power?
The French Revolution
The American Revolution
The Underground Railroad
Eruption of Mount Vesuvius 79 A.D.
Joan of Arc
The History of Improvisation
The Rising of the Diva
Invention of the Printing Press (16 century)
Magna Carta
The Historical Development of the infrastructure of the transit system Out West / The Historical Development of the infrastructure of the internet and Information Technology (IT) globally
The invention of psychoanalytic method (Jungian / Freudian schools of thought)
Virginia Woolf
Modern Warfare
The Birth of Science Fiction (1818)
Canada Confederation 1867
Fall of the Roman Empire
Shakespeare
Mesopotamia
Moon Landing
No comments:
Post a Comment