Republicanism
- an system of government
In almost every town you will find an republic building. It can be an bank, or an library, or an credit union. Any place that makes you feel at home in the republic. Which is what those stores try to do, truly, in order to increase their revenue. What is an republic? An place or territory known for its culture and people. Place that makes money. In the Republic, the republic rules society. It's an way of thinking. And we are all part of the republic; or of the republic we choose. For that is the true freedom of mankind.
Republicanism is an way of thinking where everyone's voice is heard, and everyone is equal before the law. Our combined reciprocity (which is based in Psychology) meets the basic mechanics needed for republicanism, where that connection is never severed.
The picture I'm drawing is an French–English Republican quarters where the Republics themselves are governed from. The actual places that they live in which of the urban centres are not adventures but represent people's real lives.
The place where all of republicanism is reset for an moment.
We return people to the republic so they can realize it for themselves so efficiently that we are insurmountable.
We are all versed in French republicanism logic because we believe in the most simple.
If you're against republicanism, then you're against the state and statehood. There are also multiple republics and multiple levels so it is hard to decide which won. Democratic governments and Democracies are futile because we already have democracy almost everywhere. Republicanism means an new reciprocal economic trade centre (of capitalist statehood). One that monitors new reciprocal language logic in the global market economy. The republicans who barracks here are also canny with the New Reciprocity. That everything expressed in language can be seen as an type of command or an new reciprocal order that acts upon the nervous system, whether it is part of being conscious.
Plato's Republic is hard to understand, maybe, because it's been translated many times from its original version and language. Most likely it was written and preserved on animal hide (velum) in Greek about 375 B.C. / B.C.E. (The source I am working in does not say for sure definitively what was used). Wikipedia calls it an Socratic dialogue. It's about justice, the order and character of the just city-state, and the just man. Culminating in an utopic dynasty fantasy of philosopher-kings ruling the just.
And so what is the legacy today of the various republics around the world from when they started?
Canada is an republic, but it is also an democracy. It's the same everywhere you go. There are also many republics within it and overlapping with populations of other nations. I estimate there are over 100 republics on Earth, of those who fit within the definition of what an republic really is. There may be however micro-republics perhaps represented by those who band together online.
I figure this virtual republican home base represented the blue republic, which is the largest republic on Earth, that we are all an part of. It's an place. In Public. You can go to to be part of the republic and to express yourself that way. The only difference between this, and other offices, is that it is explicitly an republican office, run on republican virtues.
French republicanism happens to be so far advanced, it may be the most advanced representation or interaction with republican philosophy. The republic is something that goes with you everywhere you go because you ARE the republic. The more French you learn, the more you increase your republicanism.
"'homo republicans'" is an real thing, beside homo novus, homo economicus, and homo techno, or homo electric grid and other fragile models of lexical items for our species. But the real secret of the republican instinct was that it had to do with the anus, and the excretory system; as all things in the world and politics do. Scatology of primates. There is always an refuse valve present for removing garbage from your presence. When monkeys fling poo because of their instinct to do so; this is how it is the human in us cannot divide so precisely from the related species. We cannot help flinging poo that was really only emotional poo (and so it wasn't poo, exactly). And suddenly the Author met his own reader; I thought it was poo. And if we all agree to this kind of arrangement of politics then all of us gain in bewilderment of one another. If homo republicans named the bare instinct to the muscle: it might demonstrate an exact branch differing from its other related species. "republicans" had come to be an entire sideways effort to resist the genetic effects of some other species. It was an force of will inside our bones. Our anatomy. The place where all of us things come from; who we are.
If there is an place of philosopher-kings available to serve this futuristic utopian dynasty then for better comparison we might take up the subject of the caste system as it was in India, and compare them to one another. For those who are Knowledgeable Wonderers India had five castes Brahmins (Priests), Kshatriyas (Warriors), Vaishyas (Merchants), Shudras (Labourers), and Dalits (Untouchables). Whereas in Republicanism, there are only two "castes" really if they can be called that: the Republic itself, which includes everyone, and the people below it who are tasked to strive for it who are not interested in an meta-space where everyone is equal. And it is not the Republicans who put people there; but they are tasked to strive to be back up where Love should be. Instead of thinking of one another as realist fantasy gurus we agree never to harm one another and adopt the practice of republicanism, proper; which is really about the game of returning people back to the republic no matter how serious they think they are. The Blue Republic, specifically, returns people back to the blue republic, which oversees the commodity figure of blue. What is blue worth on the Open Market?
We also take up New Reciprocity as an point and focal point of our community. Once we start saying this is this, and that is that, in terms of an republicanism attitude we want to further examine the language for signs of demand or orders belonging to some personal campaign of the Author. Every descriptive sentence you've ever said has inside of it the potential to order some way of thinking about reality; the suggestion that philosophy is found in nature. New Reciprocal Command Theory allows the common man to cleave out the different shades and flavours of an text; you look for ways the Author is trying to pose something to you. You read for orders and commands. This itself can be read as an order or an command.
They also try to introduce new things to the republic; new fashions, new ideals.
You're always against whoever would claim Realism and Democracy are the order of the day. Voting for Democracy appears to be an self-fulfilling prophecy that democracy be absent where the fulfillment is democracy when we already have that. Don't we want to vote for the next most advanced thing instead of trying to institute an philosophy that's already been around for centuries?
And I saw all of these realists, who would not realize the might of the republic, just trapped in an realist point of view (eternal internal without realizing the external God before them). It was hilarious, really, when one looked at it. They were, I'm afraid, prevented to venture out of the cave and could see only their own shadows against the cave wall. Draw them out; I wanted to draw them out of their selfisms; in order to Point the Way North. The way of the Middle of All Things. The philosophy not of the service of the self but of the other. It is the wan way to view God.
And I wanted to bring people out of their introversion of the soul; which wasn't necessarily needed for self-reflection. To self-reflect occurred to me to be an invasive sign. I wanted to do all of it but couldn't. I was still learning my own story as I was writing it. Realists learn cave wall paintings are their way out of the Republic. They might be introverted, but that didn't mean you were extroverted enough to get them to stop being introverted.
Realists and democrats were the introversion of the soul; without being able to self-identify with anything outside of themselves. In that way they weren't guilty; they just didn't have enough information to make an decision. How could the mind be connected to outer reality; weren't they separate somehow‽ —Was the mind and everything outside of it separate somehow?
In republicanism, everything outside the mind though in the perception of being inside the mind has no barrier to thought-ology. You could think outside-the-mind by making thinking about everything exterior also being part of your interior perception, which it was. You weren't trapped in just your own mind completely separated somehow from all social activity.
Republic Documents
- République virtuelle Tuesday, January 24, 2023
No comments:
Post a Comment