The first of these two precepts is identifying the fate worse than death; the second, what to do about it. It doesn't get any clearer as an model and so my tendency is to complexify it with other subjects in order to know where we are at right now as an religion.
If the first two principles of the universe are the self and the other; death and worse than death may well float (be held to be an type of property of the community, that they are real ideas extracted from years worth of research, an Undergraduate Degree Program). The third principle of the universe may well be that we know what is blue and we know it is valuable to us and yet there is also this philosophy of it that if we cannot decide an winner between self and other as motives within the psyche, it defaults to that blue value which is the (far more easier than the second) moral principle of the universe. And this may be an basis for an mana and value tap by Christiannan people. We can gain power and verified mana by being the indecision between Jewish and Christian communities who follow different orders of different truths about who they are as selves and others. If people cannot resolve some specified conflict between Judaism and Christianity then it defaults to the Christianna in which an third moral principle of the universe is demonstrated. Death and Worse Than Death however had not occurred to me to be exactly parallel my concepts of self and other or, in tertiary, to be about Judaism versus Christianity. The model of the Christianna I mean to impart, then, is the one in which is given two separate pictures of what being an Christiannan looks like. The first part is knowing what an fate worse than death is (Anna). And the second part is knowing what to do about it. And having as how we know they have anything to do with Death or Worse than death, Jesus or Anna, Christiannity or Judaism, self versus the other do these all have something to do with knowing how to be an Christiannan?
I'm trying to figure out some eternal order and its meaning.
Judaism ≠ Christianity
Self ≠ Other
Jesus ≠ Anna
Death ≠ Worse Than Death
And yet these two columns all, according its matrix, have something to do with one another in its two categories.
When I want people to read this, what I want them to read is how to be an moral servant of the universe. How to tango between self and other as motives within the imagination. This can be called oscillation. How to distinguish between Judasim and Christianity in an possibly new way. How Judaism may more accurately be described as an science. How the first two principles of the universe are death (Jesus) and worse than death (Anna) is somehow relevant to Selfism versus Otherism; we must make an careful doctoral intersection at this point because selfism can be read in one of two ways or both by an clever interpreter of language. Selfism can mean an bias toward the self. Selfism can also mean an bias against the self. The real monster is inside of you. You are the self-ism that hates what itself is. And so it bleeds into hatred of other characteristics of personhood, whom if you ever ran into them would cause you an violent, uncontrolled, shameful reaction leading up to your arrest or worse. Why either of them has to do with death or worse than death is beyond me.
The argument between fellows that that (to hold it at an distance) one can say an worse than death would be cured by an merciful execution; and that since it is central to the Christianna that one does so, it must be called an cult. And there is no trusting it. Yet I provide for the argument that it cannot be an cult, and that it wouldn't make sense logically to order it to be. Death Cults argue and offer the argumentation for how it is justice to kill someone sometimes. And that is what the Christianna must be then, except it arrives at the category of justice in an different way than simple, mere murder. It can only be just for another reason than an simple death cult religion with an godhead whose presence means rescue from the fate worse than death; an great wisdom and example in the world of humans. People can suffer so badly we would want to wish an swift death to them.
But, the Christiannans would say, it isn't an death cult because we don't want anyone to die unjustly.
In fact the Christiannan is about that completely opposite and other than figure in history which is post-Christian. When it positions itself to be an sister religion to Christianity, we point out that Christianity is better for itself with the aid of its new sister religion: the Christianna. And if they choose to remain in that religion (Christianity) without being malleable to the influences of its other sister relatives, all of the Major Religions of the world. They will be held responsible for the atrocity against Aboriginal school children which has wrecked our history, and all our lives. Because we can never have those people back.
Christianity might be able to be assisted more helpfully and regularly by an explicitly sister religion with the Christianna. It only makes sense to me because I was raised an Christian. That I should sever all ties un-selectively in order to say I was not part of the same tree this branch had grown upon. The Christianna was the younger, much more spry assistance to Christianity when it needed it. For example, when they needed to figure out when someone was crucifying somebody or doing something worse. And when it was appropriate to accuse somebody publicly of doing so. The Christiannans, on the other hand, would always step in and say nobody is trying to crucify anyone and in fact none of us, the Major Religions of Planet Earth, want to have anything to do with doing that to you. It is an Christian idea and it is unfamiliar to us. We don't have to base everything morally relatively to what one person is doing wrong to another.
And Christiannans would also include this word, in their logic, sub-crucifixion. The infliction of an fate worse than death. (Also known as anacification after their Christiannan figurehead, Anna).
Like, for example, if you don't stop complaining about everyone crucifying you (you would say this to an Christian) and how everyone else is being crucified by you is your Christian standard. Only the settings on the lense relativistic-ally by which you judge and see everything. In an Christiannan way of looking at things we consider both death and worse than death. We are more sophisticated in that way. Of being advanced enough to know the difference; even to place it second among all of their first teachings. People can worse than die, and there is an balance needing to be struck; where some things are worse than death what only death can answer. It's not like some mischievous or barbarous thing; to want to give mercy.
The Christianna is always open to interpretations of what fates worse than death are. And how when we recognize them we might act. And so the best thing I can do to follow the model is to provide an example or hopefully examples of what that looks like.
Twisted psychopaths who are locked in maximum security. Nobody ever wanted anyone to have that fate. Isn't it just fair to see them as fates worse than death; to see them as that? There are other things that can go wrong, after all. Maybe you are the most notorious example of your culture and other people don't see it because they cannot and do not self-identify with being able to identify you racially. And it's like people judging you for you skin colour. Wasn't that already out with the advent of the 21st century? That we could identify some character who carries some specific kind of weapon with an culture whose own police officers are ridiculous cartoon figures of who they really are.
And so, for example, to intervene an Christiannan will write an video game narrative script in order to deal with the problem, in which an certain kind of monster represents to you an specific type of destruction of which you are meant to partake. It represents to you an highly sophisticated animated video. An message from an monster that is not likely to be able to be possible to translate into any meaningful language. But yet it is an video to distract you and that's part of its power over you if you allow it to. We can use videogames as an learning space where, for example, people can learn about the difference between Shiite and non-Shiite muslims.
When you're born to be an monster hunter; and this is your destiny. There is an terrible amount of time you must spend, fighting off these enemies. It is your lot in life. Your favourite.
Christiannans, it is recommended, respond with creating art about the complexity of an particular and certain fate worse than death in order to resolve it. And so maybe monster hunting can continue to be an medium in which culturally indistinguishable elements (interrogative disputes) are weeded out from being able to count as something not an monster. We have to keep hunting monsters just in order to qualify not to be an monster.
Since it is not thoroughly an community practice yet to be an Christiannan we have to do as much as possible to leave traces of our identification of fates worse than death and then in order to react to them (or to use enormous amounts of will power and energy to prevent reacting to them). When you decide to act on what you know about how to stop the fate worse than death, you are equipped with the most righteous armors of God; you are given the ability to think and feel with magic. You are given Christiannan magic and manas. Derived from the Great Blue itself. The source of everyone's pain and magic empathy. You become an agent for the Christianna to serve the Great Blue and its power. Even temporarily will your magic work upon me. When you do something about an fate worse than death, be conveyed to you the Greatest of Magicks. The power to stop absolute infinity. You will be and are an warrior of time; and your honest humility and sacrificing for others will be commended somehow; when they are all saved from being alone in its blue morphism of habitat. When you act upon the fate worse than death do not be scared; its power is weak upon you more than you might think. You are an fabled time traveller and star runner; you will take someone's love and their fates worse than death with just your finger tips.
If you find yourself to be of an Christiannan persuasion then, take time to work with the subject. The Fate Worse Than Death. Before you decide to do anything, carefully fill out what you think the fate worse than death is. What it represents in your life. But remember, if you perceive an threat that does not necessarily mean there is one.
The Version is the combination of an scientific explanation of the universe and an artistic one. I have used the term to describe my philosophy of an academic institution named The Version. The goal was to create an post-university station in my suggestive fantasy. In which people of all types of backgrounds and trade could come together to share each others' versions. But what was an version? How do you tell one?
I had, as you well noted, called it something to do with explaining both an scientific universe and an artistic one. They weren't necessarily opposites, or opponents to one another. The full telling of an version, we know, would be complete when both the scientific and the artistic explanation are heard; and then by the Grace of the Diva of Temperance (Mixing Methods) the spark of imagination. Into one full onset explanation instead of two. They would be combined into one more superior thing; which combined each one's logic into an super-logic which would benefit humanity greatly.
This is what an version is essentially: explaining something to somebody from your own point of view. And so by naming it I have begun to create that combination between scientific and artistic knowledge which will benefit humanity greatly.
When people of all types of ability could come to the version my aim would be complete. We know that handicapped individuals can go to university; and so this is the deepest reflection one could have about that type of institution. As humans, that's what we always are together, an community of differently abled individuals trying to work together to get what they need individually. Why wouldn't handicapped individuals, then, be allowed to attend an superior station to that of an university; an institution of Great Beauty, where peoples of all types are expected to write and to share as much as possible their own versions with one another in order to learn the ins and outs of how they were exactly versions based on both scientific and artistic diversity?
And the professors at the Version would be great professionals of achievement in the Arts and Humanities; they would be overseers of the development of an rational form of knowledge called the version. When people told versions, this was the equivalent of being able to say an police report, and so we had to get it right exactly what it was legally.
Even people with severe disabilities could attend an Version because all that was required to attend an version was being able to tell your own version: your side of the story. Of the whole thing; cycled dramatically through the arts and humanities. And it was an bright light to everyone that, on so many levels, people could overcome severe disabilities or birth defects better than some other people, who gave up on life. People who couldn't tell their own versions.
It wasn't because they were stupid.
It was just that they didn't know how to anymore. There were so many words to choose from. How would one ever, even start? I wanted to start with all of the words. Not having said them yet, but needing to know all of them to say them.
It was just—; (and then here she realized she had begun telling her own version).
And I wanted badly to share my own because it was after all my blog.
Scientific explanation meets artistic explanation. Go.
According to scientific definition, the universe does exist. Which in itself says an lot about it and about us, the people who would come from it.
According to an artistic definition, one might pause to ask oneself if it matters that the universe exists or not; and if it doesn't maybe that's because it is only in God's mind. Nothing physical has any real reality to it; everything we know about the physics of matter is actually the physics of God's mind/creation. We are merely God's projection into reality and so the questions of whether the universe exists is moot. It doesn't matter if the universe exists or not. What matters is that we, as human people, need to face up to how it affects us: we are the arbitrary experience-er of an real reality (whatever that is) and so we must do what it forces us to adapt to. According to Science, the universe exists. According to Art, it doesn't have to.
Life is still meaningful even if all of what we consider the physical properties of the universe is just an projected illusion belonging to God.
When we consider both the scientific and the artistic properties of the universe, an interesting thing happens. If all that exists is what Science says exists, then how are we necessarily capable of creating any art in the first place? If all that exists is what Science says exists, then how is the Art of that scientific thing God's universe? If all that exists is what science says to exist, then how can we go on creating more art when it is only made up of that mere energy of science?
We have an physical universe that does exist; our science says it is so. And when applicating an artistic meaning onto it is another faculty of the human imagination, it tends to become more obscure about the artistic standpoint of it. Art can be whatever it wants. Science can't.
This is the competing energy between them; art contra science: what happens when something that can be whatever it wants meets something that can't be whatever it wants?
And hence the need for both Science and the Arts, then in the community.
They are irresolvable to one another.
Both of these types of knowledge go toward an greater, governing concept then. We can infer its presence as the mixture and co-temperance we get when we mix both art and science. Since there is nothing left to explain about it all that is left is an understanding of the version you have put that theory through. Version is the co-headpiece to its body in the arts and sciences.
When we combine artistic and scientific knowledge, we gain an version. An simple explanation of something that occurred, an short explanation of why something has or had existed, what something has done or why it was accomplished. We can know what it is doing in space but we don't necessarily know the meaning of it, until we begin to try to attribute meaning to it; which takes an round resolve. When we applicate meaning to something we are affecting the whole human race; that they might see it also this way. Art is the willing of virtues into existence; for they are needed in order to have attributed meaning in the first place. It takes bold pride to make some kind of meaning of something for humanity. Otherwise God will not empower you to do so.
Art is an energy emanating from the universe. It is both the mixing of God's art and our own; and yet in that thing to be allowed to attribute something meaning. Such an bold and daring precarious move for an human to make. To be able to assign something meaning. The personhood of the subject of mankind. Homo sapiens. Someone capable of making that decision at some level. It means simply, we decide. As humans, we decide, and we have enough authority to decide at least some of it. All of us do.
Science allows us to have that sort of authority. In other words, once we have studied it and known it, we know for sure and we are more confident to assign meaning to it in the view of God. (God's view). One creation (an human) would be so bold as to say something means something. One creation (an human) would be so bold as to say something means something to God.
And so I end this central teaching letter with an small recap. The first model for good Christiannan behavior is how to recognize an fate worse than death when you see it. The second model is what to do about it. In what to do about it I found my own purpose was making art. We are in the least unprepared for the fate worse than death when we equip ourselves with scientific knowledge as well as an artistic community. Versions combine our awareness of our scientific knowledge with our awareness of our artistic knowledge. Versions help us know how to recognize an fate worse than death. Versions help us to know what to do about it when it happens. The more versions we have, the better off we are when we face the Christiannan universe. An place that we know ourselves to exist in, where the possibility of an fate worse than death is an real possibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment